Possibly, I don't know.Quote:
Originally Posted by ancient hibee
Anyone know what the story was at the Celtic game? I hear police were wading into the Celtic sections.
Printable View
Possibly, I don't know.Quote:
Originally Posted by ancient hibee
Anyone know what the story was at the Celtic game? I hear police were wading into the Celtic sections.
Was that not the segregation,front 3 rows in top tier was also emptyQuote:
Originally Posted by Moulin Yarns
The two faced rabble were apparently on their best behaviour last night but normal service will be resumed at their next domestic match. They’ve got the SPFL and SFA weighed up and in their back pockets.
Dare say the full songbook will get big licks on Sunday as ultimately folk know there will be no repurcussions
Of course all the songs, with all the add ons, will return for league games. UEFA has proved that the bigotry can be stopped when there are meaningful consequences. THE SFL/SFA must introduce strict liability too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim44
Deleted as 3rd hand info so Not worth it
UEFA have in one fail swoop managed to get Rangers to stop making excuses and their supporters to wind their necks in.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hermit Crab
It would be great if they get fired into Celtic next.
Celtic and their supporters are keen users of semantics to muddy the waters when challenged, however, UEFA would cut right through that as they have proved with Rangers.
I don't think they can. Clubs including Hibs have always blocked it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hibernia&Alba
It would need government action but they are a bit busy at the moment.
No pitch invasion last night after the last minute winner. That was a surprise.
I was travelling home with my wife by train from Glasgow last night and was a bit concerned at the number of sevco fans getting on board. These could only have been early departures from the game but maybe 100 or so.
Was pleasantly surprised they could not have been better behaved. No songbook. No disturbance just regular passenger behaviour.
What a difference UEFA have made with just one intervention
Quote:
Originally Posted by HoboHarry
Roughly 6,000
Busy doing nothing, working the whole day through. Trying to find lots of things not to do :singing:Quote:
Originally Posted by CMurdoch
It won’t last, however. Tomorrow is a blank cheque to abandon the restraint of UEFA scrutiny. and, in the absence of any repercussions, the full songbook will be aired. Celtic, of-course, will be just as guilty.Quote:
Originally Posted by CentreLine
Yes sadly I have to agree. Last night in Glasgow must have been a joy for the authorities having to deal with such restrained and level headed individuals on the streets. If that atmosphere carries on in to Ibrox tomorrow it will be awful.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim44
Are they paying 7 million for Kent from Liverpool? Where are they getting that from?
Think it’s getting paid over a number of years with something like £3m up frontQuote:
Originally Posted by Hibernia&Alba
They paid 3.5 million for the Swedish defender who was left on the bench yesterday. Glib and shameless liar is up to something dodgy :agree:Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomtownHibeys
Accounts showed £15.5 million loss last season spent £12 million this year. Wages must be high as the squad is huge. I know they have UEFA money but surely trouble ahead.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hibernia&Alba
Desperate throw of the dice to try to deny Celtic ten-in-a-row. I really hope it all collapses again.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sammy7nil
If Liverpool have sanctioned something like that then I really hope they are deservedly stiffed when the new huns go pop.Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomtownHibeys
Stevie G ain't half getting a favour there.
That’s pretty standard to be fair. Although with Glibby’s track record you’d think there’d be alarm bells.Quote:
Originally Posted by Smartie
I thought Kent was a no bad player but £7M seems a bit desperate?
Did soft loans from the owners cover that loss?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sammy7nil
Were Liverpool not looking for £10m for him not so long ago?Quote:
Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens
This move would be a huge risk for Rangers and Liverpool, unless there's a clause where Liverpool get him back if Sevco go pop.
The closer 10 in a row gets, the weaker the Sevco position becomes.
And as much as their European adventures are disappointing, yesterday was "pleasing" for people who value sporting integrity.
If they had won yesterday I wonder if they would have went all out to sign him. Heard today that Jones may be out for the season as wellQuote:
Originally Posted by Smartie
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens
Horgan had better stats-he's massively overhyped.
I must admit I was surprised to hear that, as I thought he was top notch when I saw him play against us last season.Quote:
Originally Posted by ancient hibee
He was outstanding that day at Easter Road.Quote:
Originally Posted by Smartie
Huns' dodgy dealings in evidence once again here.
Yip! Looked as though he injured himself tackling/taking out the Celtic player serves him rightQuote:
Originally Posted by BoomtownHibeys
Well done Karma.Quote:
Originally Posted by BILLYHIBS
JJ claiming that Sevco signed Ryan Kent after the window had closed. Its hard to grapple with some of the nonsense he writes but this would be marvelous if true......
https://johnjamessite.com/
Definite double counting going on here...
Sevco have previously said regular Europa League participation is crucial to their financial viability, but now say progress to the group stage has enabled them to fund Ryan Kent move?
I suppose, having qualified for the group stage two seasons in a row, things are going well on that front, but they lost £14m last year and their row with Sports Direct is still unresolved.
One thing about Sevco's board is that it is now chock full of die hard Huns. I think they are doubling down desperately to try and stop Celtc's 10IAR.Quote:
Originally Posted by jacomo