Surely they could have been a bit more original than use the same widely ridiculed story as last year's.
Printable View
Surely they could have been a bit more original than use the same widely ridiculed story as last year's.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
:hilarious
:top marks
😂😂😂Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
BBC hasn't been much better in all honesty. Are they all that terrified that they'll get their window put in?Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith_M
I'm struggling to understand the bit about Morelos. It says the Chinese Club were prepared to meet "Ranger's" valuation but no bid was received! Seems like SSN are making it up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deansy
Even the **** story has a subtext of ‘hey, we’re just writing what we’ve been told, we don’t believe a word of it’
They don’t even bother to explain where the £30m figure comes from... £15m transfer fee plus £10m contract adds up to...?
Mind you, last time a BBC journo actually did some work and cast doubt on these ‘bids’ he was forced to make a grovelling apology and damage his career.
Or the fat controller Jim Traynor if feeding them s***e as usual.....Quote:
Originally Posted by brog
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith_M
You can't say their board don't know their target audience - a large % of Hun are still excited/looking forward to the first brick of their '£120m casino and hotel complex' being laid !
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4264114.stm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deansy
They don’t need a casino now they have owners who regularly gamble with the clubs future.
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...bde5e30a4a.jpg
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I honestly don't get it. The dafties who print this rubbish must surely have realized by now that the very internet they are using will be used by others to discredit their nonsense?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
They really had me fooled as well.
Said with a straight face!Quote:
Originally Posted by h18eeynick
Stevie G has now confirmed there was no bid for Morelos.
Will the club now turn on their own manager and force him to make a humiliating retraction of his comments, as they did to that BBC journalist last year?
https://mobile.twitter.com/kheredine...283584?lang=en
It's like Trump or Boris. Shout something really loud and the people that want to believe it will. It then becomes a FACT.Quote:
Originally Posted by HoboHarry
Newco being ordered to pay Sports Direct £450,000 is hopefully the tip of the iceberg. Loving it.
In regards to regurgitated stories from Ibrox...
I see they're now claiming (again) that they're going to rebuild part of Ibrox to increase capacity.
That was one of the fake distraction stories used by Murray to deflect from the fact his club were going down the pan. The last time they claimed they were increasing capacity to 60,000.
http://i13.tinypic.com/4uw26xj.jpg
Is that the legal fees or the settlement?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bishop Hibee
i think it is a proportion of SDIs legal fees.Quote:
Originally Posted by PatHead
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatHead
Legal Fees. The settlement will be much larger.
Presumably Hummel will want their money back too, and the fans who bought the replica kits will want it back too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith_M
If they go into admin again, what percentage is needed in a vote for them to get a CVA? With all the directors loans now converted to shares, the money owed now is to Close Brothers and very soon to Sports Direct. Close Brothers is secured so they will want paid in full no doubt.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Is Close Bros debt to "The Rangers Football Club Limited" (formerly Sevco Scotland) aka the actual football club that holds the SPFL share etc. or to "The Rangers International Football Club plc", which wholly owns TRFC Ltd?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
I suspect that if they go bust they will try and shift TRFC ltd onto new owners while ditching the debt in TRIFC plc. So the club itself wouldn't be liquidated and no need for "Third Rangers".
You mean like what Hearts didQuote:
Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens
It’s secured on the stadium though so it’s still needs paid.Quote:
Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by GloryGlory
This will probably increase sales of Hummel shirts if anything. This season’s will become a collectors item.
Who knows what the terms are for the rest of the contract though. If Sevco negotiated as badly as they did with Ashley then they are even bigger trouble.
This really is a massive story and we will see if the media treat it as such.
What’s the chances of them going bust?Quote:
Originally Posted by jacomo
Sorry Ozy but do we know for certain that the Close Brothers loan is still outstanding?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
As I understand it, the loan was taken out to tide Rangers over till the ST money started rolling in.
Close Brothers being a lender of last resort, the terms were exacting and punitive. In Ranger’s interests to pay it back promptly I think.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stonewall
There are three charges due to Close Brothers still noted as outstanding against The Rangers Football Club on the Companies House site.
The loans are still outstanding.