Sevco now saying Celtic will only get 900 tickets for Ibrox next season. [emoji23]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Printable View
Sevco now saying Celtic will only get 900 tickets for Ibrox next season. [emoji23]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This is a good one - Sir Glibness wanting a non Executive director from the SFA suspended because of a comment he made about Rangers fans 12 years ago when he didn't even work for the SFA. He's a fe****n headcase.....
https://www.scotsman.com/sport/footb...ents-1-4744346
Quote:
Originally Posted by HoboHarry
Mind you, the SFA director probably needs a good slapping for suggesting that watching fitba in a glasgow pub with a pint of Tennents lager was "a good night".
Where are you reading this, and why?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
Would be crazy for both these teams to cut the away allocations.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Whizz
See this tweet
https://twitter.com/ClydeSSB/status/999685236081512449
Hibs please take note. Let’s put the tickets for Hibs v Rangers at home, on sale as early as possibleQuote:
Originally Posted by Ryan91
https://rangers.co.uk/news/headlines...s-a-thank-you/
The huge demand for season tickets, in advance of new applications, seems to be something they've conjured up in their own minds. Isn't it the must repugnant club in Scotland with the most expensive season tickets?
I'd have thought our near neighbours had the most expensive season tickets in Scotland (once you add on the obligatory :greengrin FoH contributions).Quote:
Originally Posted by Estupendo
Not to mention the spending at the ‘cake bakes’!Quote:
Originally Posted by cocteautwin
according to the National, Sevco are giving Celtic 800 away tickets which seems ridiculous to me.
Maybe they are getting a decent segregation unlike us. Might keep some of the spit away.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stranraer
They are just showing everyone what a huge big club they are and don't need anyone else's money. It's known as 'cutting off your nose to spite your face'
The Sevco fan groups were pushing for this last season. Basically it comes down to that they can't stand 8000 gloating Tims during their biannual humpings. :wink:Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Hackett
Stan Collymore just went off on one on The Rangers on Twitter, the best quote below;
"
I despise everything you stand for. Hope that's clear enough.
You're not the people, you're a vestige of yesteryear, and in 100 years, you'll be extinct.
"
Ouch :greengrin
Reality starting to bite after the initial flurry of optimism around Stevie G.
Linked with 34 year old James Collins after being priced out of Skrtel!
He can fill the Senderos role for them maybe?Quote:
Originally Posted by blaikie
It's strange really, what with the dogging and woman beating you would think Stan would fit in perfectly at Ibrox.Quote:
Originally Posted by IGRIGI
With Alves going nowhere and with them losing Martin and Bates.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bostonhibby
Defensively there looking good!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Hackett
I see it more that they really need the money right now.
Having to wait to be paid for the 8,000 or so seats in the Broomloan Stand during the season doesn't really fit in with their urgent need for money right now.
Seeing as there's currently a large demand for STs (the Gerrard effect), they want to take full advantage before it all goes mammaries skyward.
Good point, twice that I know of huns have spat at me.Quote:
Originally Posted by PatHead
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keekaboo
I see your point, but these seats were available as class B season tickets ( no old firm game ) so the increase in revenue can only be the difference between the B class and the full price.
On a different Sevco note , I see the other 2 directors of Rangers Retail Ltd ( the 2 Sports Direct appointees ) have joined Paul Murray and resigned from that Board, leaving Dave King as the sole director of Rangers Retail.
Obviously no one wants to be next to Mr Glib these days.
Do we have to wait another hundred years!Quote:
Originally Posted by IGRIGI
Awe Naw
A wee trip to the Capitol City will be looked upon as a real treat to the unwashed but only 850 of them will be able to make it in future, perhaps they will make it into a new lottery game for them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Is It On....
:greengrin:greengrin:na na:
Apparently Derek Johnstone has been appointed as a Sevco fatbassador.:rolleyes:
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/s...mpression=true
Let the fun begin.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Or they’ll all do a “Barry”Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
That piece is so full of holes. Assumptions and estimates abound.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
The recipients have a good case for resisting the demands. There's a basic principle of not being taxed twice on the same income which their advisers should be relying on.
You really know how to ruin the mood of a sunny bank holiday! :wink:Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
But when were they first taxed on this income …?
I reckon this is why bazza Ferguson declared himself bankruptQuote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
Ferguson bankrupt with debts of £1.4m over unpaid tax bills
Ferguson was declared insolvent with debts of more than £1.4million and is one of a number of ex-Rangers players targeted by HMRC for repayment of controversial EBT earnings.
Ohhhh it's not cut and dried.... nothing in this saga ever is :greengrinQuote:
Originally Posted by grunt
What I'm getting at is that RFC should have deducted tax and NI from the payments to the players. The fact that they didn't is their fault, and they have been assessed on that.
There is a basic principle.... or, at least, there used to be... that HMRC couldn't go after the employer and the employee for the same tax. It was always the employer that was held responsible. Even in cases (like this) where the tax wasn't actually paid because the employer had gone bust.
That all said, there is a new aggressive attitude from HMRC, which is targetting recipients of tax-avoidance schemes as well as the employers. I am sure that there will be many test-cases being lined up, both by HMRC and recipients' advisers, to test the legality of the HMRC action.
Get out in the sun....