Can somebody translate what’s going on now in thicko terms as I dinny understand. Thanks in advance :greengrin
Printable View
Can somebody translate what’s going on now in thicko terms as I dinny understand. Thanks in advance :greengrin
They were granted a licence to play in Europe in 2011.Quote:
Originally Posted by .Sean.
The allegation is that they shouldn't have been, 'cos they lied in their application.
David Murray dropped them in it when he spoke in Court last year.
They don't like it. We don't care.
You might get a heavily redacted FOI version!!😂Quote:
Originally Posted by Is It On....
I've seen it but I'm not allowed to talk about it......
The second alleges that Rangers did not follow rules that: "All members shall:- (a) observe the principles of loyalty, integrity and sportsmanship in accordance with the rules of fair play
The ibrox loyal not observing principles of loyalty? shurely not! :cb:rules:
To add to this, the lie was that they said they didn’t know about the big tax case at the time of the submission of the licence application.Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
Is CWG said, David Murray confirmed that they did know during a court case last year.
I now await for Sevco to revert to the new club/old club Hokey Cokey to get out of any punishment.
And in the 2024 news...rangers shouldn’t have been granted a UEFA licence for the season 2018/2019. The SFA said “We are unable to take retrospective action as it is ouwith the 5 year time limit. As it is consigned to history We all need to move on for the sake of the Scottish game.”
Is there any chance that their licence will get taken off of them because of this?
None whatsoever.:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Souter96Mac
I'd doubt it. It's not one of the punishments available.Quote:
Originally Posted by Souter96Mac
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
The SFA have it down to exhuberance on the part of the Hun.Quote:
Originally Posted by Winston Ingram
Phil mac..... seems to think UEFA punishment is still possible.
https://philmacgiollabhain.ie/2018/0...not-giving-up/
I guessed this was the case, cheers for clearing it up for me though.Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
So he's alleging bribery or corruption?Quote:
Originally Posted by greenginger
Season 6 begins.....
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Howling at the moon. AgainQuote:
Originally Posted by greenginger
Sent from my SM-J320FN using Tapatalk
Him and that John James chap are headcases. They write in riddles.Quote:
Originally Posted by greenginger
Surprised these charges are being raised, were we not all supposed to move on ?
Red 12 Celtic shareholders have refused to back down.Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffers
I think they will find Rangers guilty but 5 way agreement will mean no punishment.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Perhaps not for Sevco but there could still be individual consequences for Ogilvie, Bryson et al.........Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
I don't believe it!Quote:
Originally Posted by HoboHarry
You just know that the fine - if any at all - will be the lowest amount possible and that no-one from the GFA will get sacked/resign as a point of honour (the last bit is just sheer sarcasm for sarcasm's sake) !
Good things - Club
Bad things - company
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-sc...mpression=true
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I just read that....truly disgusting.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
Morally bankrupt, the people's club my manky ring.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
Their offer to pass on the contact details is thinly veiled sarcasm, the sooner this mob die for good the better.
Morally wrong, for sure, but I get the legal thinking. Simply put, the new company bought the assets of the old company, but not the liabilities.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinribs
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
Don’t worry. I’m sure the BJK brigade will be petitioning The Rangers as we speak to address this historic wrong.
After all, they claim to care very deeply about abuse...
Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
Careful now, you are going to tie yourself in knots here!
You seem to be arguing that the new company is a separate entity from the old Rangers which died in 2012.
Yup, I'm arguing that the new company bought the assets of the old company, but not the liabilities.Quote:
Originally Posted by jacomo
No knots there.
However, it opens up the same old (unsettled) argument about club/company, so best not to waste more bandwidth.:greengrin
Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
Did the SFA not say that although they are a new entity they were still basically the same Rangers and their history would be untouched, so in essence the newco are responsible for whatever happened in the past.
If that's the case, then they would be resposible for their debts as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by J-C
I'd rather not rely on the SFA for an interpretation of company law.:greengrin
That "cheap and nasty attacks" comment is particularly classless.