I'm not and you didn't, I'm not here. I'm invisible.......
:greengrin
Printable View
So Keekaboo you have a German keyboard, Green Goblin has a Portuguese keyboard and I have an American keyboard. This is a multi-nation, international scale problem.......
I remember the Richard Gough chants in the 90s when we played Rangers at ER. Sure most do.
This seems like a good time for my "when can we expect them to go bust again" question :greengrin
I may not be fully aware of all the allegations, but from what I can see JJ's 'outing' of Gough is disgraceful.
So what if he enjoyed the company of rent boys? So long as it was consensual, what business is it of anyone else's?
JJ seems to be linking it to the emerging abuse scandal, yet I've not seen any allegations that Gough was involved in that at all.
His name is being dragged through the mud here. Is it really necessary?
I'm surprised folk take any notice of John James who quite clearly has an obsession with Rangers and an agenda. No right in the heid.
In contrast I think it's great people are keeping tabs on what's happening with the rangers. They are a poison to our game allied with their puppet smsm and some at the governing bodies. They have a crooked lying king in charge who should never have passed any fit and proper persons checks. Their supporters constantly sing sectarian hatred and let off smokebombs and fireworks without anything done about it.
I think the likes of JohnJames are to be congratulated not put down because they highlight possible wrongdoing by the rangers.
Glory Glory
See post 35705
JJ stated that there was a belief that one of the boys was 15 at the time.....
https://johnjamessite.com/2016/12/10...you-were-here/
I pretty much agree & I believe the key word is consensual. However we must remember at the time of these alleged occurrences Gough was Rangers & Scotland captain. He potentially had the opportunity to use ( or abuse ) his highly regarded position to unduly influence events. There's a myriad of laws which can be used to charge someone with taking advantage of a ( possibly vulnerable ) person & they're not all predicated on that person's age. I think the main point here though is if nothing wrong took place then why was there this alleged cover up, to which Craig Brown also seems to be referring? Like Watergate the cover up may end up being more problematic than the offence. As for Craig Brown, I've been in his company on several occasions & he's an intelligent & witty man but he's always been a self-serving publicist. Time for him to put up or shut up.
Great points well put. It may not have been as simplistic as simply paying for sex with appropriately aged adults for if it was Craig Brown was wrongful to judge RG. Craig Brown has left a lot of question marks with his shrouded remarks regarding RG and as you say should enlighten us or never have spoken about it at all.
Glory Glory
That is worded very vaguely and no evidence provided.
He says that Gough received a caution, but not what for. Cottaging could be a criminal matter, but lots of gay men have been prosecuted for crimes that, in the grand scheme of things, harmed nobody.
I stand by my earlier comment. Unless JJ has evidence to the contrary, his moral finger-pointing at Gough disgusts me. I get the point about police / media collusion around Rangers, but I find the tone of his piece quite troubling.