Printable View
http://www.philmacgiollabhain.ie/cru...-transparency/
PhilMac. posting a piece suggesting Dave King's clean bill of health from S.A authorities might be dodgy.
I know Philmac tends to take shots in the dark, but it would not surprise me for King to give the SFA any piece of paper knowing full well it would never be checked.
Even if it is dodgy, I'm not sure what Ashley can do, given that he dropped his case.Quote:
Originally Posted by greenginger
Perjury would be a different case would it not?Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
Just strikes me as total defensive drivel. I have no doubt King has a history that is questionable to say the least but Ashley dropping the case makes it clear he can't or won't fight it anymore.Quote:
Originally Posted by greenginger
I hate to say it but this thread might be close to being one for the archives?
It would, of course. But did this case actually reach Court? (genuine question.. there have been so many :greengrin)Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLake
Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
Tell the SFA they've been duped and the SFA will run Dave King out of town , would'nt they ! :greengrin
[QUOTE=Col2;4668620]Just strikes me as total defensive drivel. I have no doubt King has a history that is questionable to say the least but Ashley dropping the case makes it clear he can't or won't fight it anymore.
I hate to say it but this thread might be close to being one for the archives?[/QUOTE]
Please, let's at least keep it open for the Green and Whyte trial :cb
http://www.theoffshoregame.net/475-2/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Damning letter to Campbell Ogilvie from the Tax Justice Network.
http://www.theoffshoregame.net/wp-co...FA-Annexes.pdf
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
http://linkis.com/com/o1K7j
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ozyhibby, what do the stories in the links in the past few posts actually mean?
Is the "TJN" referred to in the last post actually a respectable body with a valid, independent standing or is it a self-appointed bunch of Celtic fans hell-bent on seeing Rangers stripped of titles?
(Apologies - I find a lot of this stuff tricky to read and work out exactly what is being alleged. I also think that much of what has been written - P McG, John James etc has ultimately boiled down to being deluded, optimistic rantings of people with a twisted agenda).
Is it basically suggesting that Campbell Ogilvie was less than honest with the LNS enquiry and therefore is requesting a full enquiry?
Is this likely to happen/ do they have the clout to get this to happen?
They appear to be a big deal.
http://www.taxjustice.net/about/who-we-are/
I doubt they are Celtic fans.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The report does indeed show and presents evidence that Ogilvie mislead the LNS enquiry.Quote:
Originally Posted by Smartie
What is needed now is for the media to pick up the story.
:tumble:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
I really like that you post all these links and I appreciate the time and effort you make.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
My take on this is there's little to disagree with. I just wish it was more than an uncredited blog post so we really have no idea where it came from.
It's not uncredited?Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack
Sorry, wrong post!Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
Fury erupts as former Rangers owner Sir David Murray given go-ahead for £1bn housing estate on green belt land
18:12, 17 MAY 2016 UPDATED 18:57, 17 MAY 2016
BY JOHN FERGUSON
EDINBURGH councillors told to “hang their heads in shame” after overruling their own experts to grant planning permission for the construction of the Garden District
COUNCILLORS who overruled experts to grant Sir David Murray planning permission for a huge housing scheme on green belt land have been told to “hang their heads in shame”.
Experts at Edinburgh City Council said the former Rangers owner should not be given the go-ahead for thousands of homes on green belt land until a local plan was fully developed.
But in a bizarre move councillors berated them and gave Murray the green light anyway.
The first phase of Murray’s Garden District will see 1320 homes and a primary school built between the City Bypass and Gogar Station Road in west Edinburgh.
Read More: Edinburgh Council planners reject Sir David Murray's £1bn Garden District proposal
Developer Murray Estates eventually plan to construct a £1billion development of 6000 homes as well as a 60-acre “national garden”.
But the Greens condemned the proposals. The Party's planning spokesman, Councillor Nigel Bagshaw,said: “Edinburgh needs more housing in compact and well-serviced neighbourhoods, making use of existing brownfield sites.
“Sticking the adjective ‘garden’ in front of a development neither makes it green nor in the city’s best interest.
“Edinburgh needs more housing – affordable housing in compact and well-serviced neighbourhoods, making use of existing brownfield sites.
“It absolutely does not need developments like this – suburban sprawl, greenbelt-wrecking and with poor links to transport, walking and cycling.
Read More: Fall of the house of David Murray: Documents show ex-Ibrox chief's business is now officially dead
“The planning committee members who backed this scheme should hang their heads in shame.”
Alison Johnstone, Scottish Green MSP for Lothian, added: “I would urge the full council to see sense and overturn the planning committee’s decision, which smacks of desperation.
“The city council’s energies should be going into transforming existing brownfield sites that have good infrastructure connections and bringing empty properties back into use.”
After the latest decision, phase one will go before the full council next month to be ratified, then will be *referred to the Scottish Government for final approval.
Murray Estates, said: “We believe this will be a world class extension to the capital and will become one of the city’s most successful developments.”
The route cause of Edinburgh's housing shortage was the failure of Pieman Ltd's spectacular plans for a new Gorgieville to be realised.
Flats, glorious flats ! :singing::singing:
What are the council getting for the yam out of this? That's what I want to know[emoji6]Quote:
Originally Posted by silverhibee
Funny that, as this was my first thought too! Hmm something in that methinks!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Bostonhibby
I think this will be the councillors being looked after personally on this occasion. A last hurrah for a labour council that knows it's on the way out at the next election. Might as well cash in first.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bostonhibby
Could he be one of the mysterious backers of the new stand in return for....Quote:
Originally Posted by Bostonhibby
Where they getting the steel for the stand?
The sort of decision which should be immediately forwarded to Scottish Government for review IMO.
http://rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/club-statement-57/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That is interesting. I thought they had a 7 year notice period to complete re Sports Direct? It might just be another spin.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
They do but given King's winning streak against Ashley in the courts I wouldn't bet against him winning.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSmith
I feel dirty, opening that!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
:agree: Also amusing is their side banner #goingfor55 - obviously still in denialQuote:
Originally Posted by Joe6-2