https://x.com/SkyFootball/status/181...rVMdtchKw&s=19
Sent from my SM-A405FN using Tapatalk
Printable View
https://x.com/SkyFootball/status/181...rVMdtchKw&s=19
Sent from my SM-A405FN using Tapatalk
To be expected. He did a terrific job overall and transformed England from the shambles they were prior to him taking on the role.While thankfully the press aren't as merciless as they used to be (Graham Taylor and turnips springs to mind), the pressure that comes with the England job must weigh heavily on anyone who takes it and I imagine eight years feels like long enough for him. Good bloke who can leave with his head held high.
It should be easy for the FA to appoint a better manager but it's very unlikely they'll find a luckier one.
You don't 'luck' your way to the record he had with England. It came down to years of hard work, right from when he was head of elite development. That's what shaped the current England side and included World Cup wins for their U20s and U17s (or possibly their U15s, I can't remember which). He's been a key figure in raising the bar for their national team and if you look at their record down the years before he took on the top job he's actually had them punching above their weight. He clearly leaves them in a good place for whoever succeeds him.
Don’t think he has had them punching above their weight more punching their weight. England squads were notorious for being very cliquey and tended to be split on lines Southgate has improved that very much and much more integrated. There is probably more money pumped into the England team than any in the world given the enormous investment in St George's park and additional tapping into and utilising best practice be that sport science nutrition analysis etc. They will also have benefited enormously from the off the scale investment in the EPL and literally billions pumped into academies and developing youth players. England should be competing at the final stages on that basis.
It’s not really is it you don’t luck your way to semi finals and finals over a long period of time.Given the number of times they have marginally lost out on penalties their record should be better than it is. Matter of time before they start winning tournaments. Natural progression imo
Re the draws - you can only beat what’s in front of you.
For every Germany and Argentina who knocked England out pre-Southgate there’s an Iceland, a Portugal or a Romania.
I reckon that to win something, they probably do need to move on from Southgate, learn to play a more expansive game and make some tough decisions on some key positions and players.
Southgate enjoyed the odd break, but every successful manager does. What is unarguable though is the fact that he was a great success.
He leaves a brilliant platform for the next person to build on.
Southgate has real class, very articulate and calm, and undoubtedly talented, probably more so in his work through the age groups and nurturing young talent. His record recently is very poor considering the opposition however, and I use the word “poor” in the sense that England should have been comfortable in every game up to the final but were often outplayed by weaker opponents and were too defensive and loyal to players who weren’t playing well (Kane a case in point). He had an embarrassment of riches but couldn’t create a team, shown by the fact they lost the most important games of his tenure against teams who were the sum of all their parts whilst not being blessed with the same level of player (Croatia, France, Italy and now Spain). The next manager has to be brave and integrate players like Palmer, Watkins, Trent, etc and be bold enough to drop players like Kane, Walker and Rice who for me had a very poor tournament. Mainoo wasn’t the answer either.
Wish him all the best though, very likeable and he’ll get a top job soon.
He's successful in that he's took them far in competitions, and has a good record...but he's unsuccessful in that they've achieved nothing, and haven't really looked like they should.
This England squad are far better than Southgate has got out of them.
Easily as much talent in the English team as there is in the Spanish team that beat them, but the Spanish were miles better.
You can blame the players, or the manager, or both. Southgate, in my opinion, was Englands weak point, and that seemed clear before the tournament even started.
Where did the 'luck' come in? They did what they had to do to get to the final. That's the bottom line in knockout tournaments. From winning the World Cup in 1966 to the year Southgate took over as manager in 2016 England won only six knockout games in total. Southgate won nine in just eight years.
He has done a great job, you only have to look at their recent record..however they have been very fortunate when getting out of groups to avoid several big guns enruoute to QF, SF, finals etc.
When faced with a top international side they have lost, simple as.
Not all down to him, some of it has to be attributed to the fact that other nations simply have better players and squads.
I wouldn't say I'm riled. Just of the view Southgate did a very good job. It's not incumbent on every Scot to belittle anything England achieve (especially when we have so little to crow about ourselves). I just don't have a problem with them.
The SNP...that's another matter, although their downfall means I've less to get riled about.
It's not incumbent but it's rivalry to me. I enjoy hearts getting beat but have loads of hearts friends. I enjoy England losing football although the wife is English. It may be bitter and hatred for some but not the majority.
The second point I've no comeback just now 😢 😂
Keep the political pish off the main board. If people want to bore themselves to tears talking about it do it on the holy ground.
Southgate didn't change tactics, the 11 players just failed to play to the levels expected, where he went wrong was not having a backbone to drop some of his so called underperforming stars.