Generic Sevco / Rangers meltdown thread

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spike Mandela

Billy King has signed on loan for Sevco....no seriously!

---

Just the 'Charity Thieves FC' helping out their big-brothers in times of their dire, desparate need !!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens

Both the Charlie Green and Lying King Sevco boards have shamefully played the "orange card" as a means of encouraging circle-the-wagons defiance among the Huns and as a distraction from how ***** they are for the most part.

---

:agree:

And Swally 'I demand to know who these people are' McCoist.

They exploit the support's base instincts when it suits them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by doddsy

I agree with you bud. It's simply not fair or helpful to taint all of the Rangers fans as bigots or slag them all of. We are a far more intelligent community than simple branding all of them with the same brush. We can't see this from an inward looking viewpoint. We must remember that it sometimes takes generations to change attitudes. But change it must, so keep up the good work of highlighting it at every opportunity and it will change due to forums like this and others.

There are plenty of decent Rangers fans but plenty of vile bigoted bampots as well unfortunately. Can't wait for Saturday.
Got my ticket today. If you're looking in Ben, thank you so very much bud!
:aok: :flag:

---

I kind of agree but, IMHO, the Hun-support is 80-20 in favour of the bigoted-bampot - although that IS an improvement from the 100% of years ago.

James Doleman in town for the Chuckie v RIFC expenses appeal.


https://twitter.com/jamesdoleman?lang=en

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Prof. ****gy

If the editor has remained in his job, he has not been over-ruled.

---

How so?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by greenginger

James Doleman in town for the Chuckie v RIFC expenses appeal.


https://twitter.com/jamesdoleman?lang=en

---

Rangers appear to be on a winning streak in court these days as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spike Mandela

Rangers appear to be on a winning streak in court these days as well.

---

I'm not expecting that to change today either. From what I remember of the first hearing, there was a lot of old club/ new club chat but not much substance from Greens lawyer although the substantial bit could have been heard privately. Hopefully I'm pleasantly surprised.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spike Mandela

Rangers appear to be on a winning streak in court these days as well.

---

Yep - all the predictions of their demise seem to have no foundation - they keep coming up smelling of roses.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Benny Brazil

Yep - all the predictions of their demise seem to have no foundation - they keep coming up smelling of roses.

---

Hardly 'no foundation' and roses. More like clinging on like a rancid corpse.:wink:

I may be missing something in this old/new/old/sevco/sevco588/the Rangers circus but if the entity now - known as The Rangers - was the same as when chucky left? Surely his contract is legal and binding in terms of court expenses and related finance?

Green has had to cough up £ 50,000 up front to get this appeal heard so he must think he has a case.

The way I see it is , that if the Judges say he can't be funded, they are saying they consider him guilty of the charges before the case even starts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by greenginger

Green has had to cough up £ 50,000 up front to get this appeal heard so he must think he has a case.

The way I see it is , that if the Judges say he can't be funded, they are saying they consider him guilty of the charges before the case even starts.

---

Establishment looking after the establishment club?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by greenginger

James Doleman in town for the Chuckie v RIFC expenses appeal.


https://twitter.com/jamesdoleman?lang=en

---

This is the big one, IMO.

If RIFC lose................... :cb

Made it through the storm and now at the Court of Session for Charles Green v Rangers International Football Club.

1/2


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Green is appealing the ruling by Lord Doherty that Rangers are not liable for his legal bills in the current fraud proceedings against him.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Due to ongoing fraud proceedings I expect there will be restrictions on what we can report but will post out what I can


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by greenginger

The way I see it is , that if the Judges say he can't be funded, they are saying they consider him guilty of the charges before the case even starts.

---

I don't see it quite that way. It seems to be a technical legal discussion about how Green's contract terms should be interpreted. Doesn't really go anywhere near the substance of the wider fraud allegations IMO. But I could well be wrong.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by greenginger

Green has had to cough up £ 50,000 up front to get this appeal heard so he must think he has a case.

The way I see it is , that if the Judges say he can't be funded, they are saying they consider him guilty of the charges before the case even starts.

---

Think it's more to prove that he can pay the costs of THIS case if it goes against him. Otherwise, it would be a frivolous appeal.

Don't think the fraud case will/should have any impact on the decision made in this one.

Lord Doherty has allowed us to tweet from court as long as we stay within reporting restrictions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Charles Green is represented by Alan Dewar QC and Jonathan Brown


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Rangers are represented by Mr Walker. company secretary James Blair is also in attendance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

One unusual factor in today's case is that Lord Doherty "sealed" his original judgment so we don't know the grounds of his decision


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The 3 judges enter court and proceedings commence


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Alan Dewar QC for Green rises to open the hearing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dewar asks for the "reclaiming motion to be upheld.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dewar says case rests on how the court defines the phrase "Rangers football club"


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dewar said the only possible way to interpret the phrase "Rangers football club" is as the company formally known as " Sevco Scotland."


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ozyhibby

Dewar says case rests on how the court defines the phrase "Rangers football club"


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

Haha!

Dewar invites the court to consider Lord Doherty ruled that the definition of "Rangers football club" was ambiguous


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dewar mentions appeal court ruled in favour of former News of the World editor Andy Coulson in a similar case


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk