It's easy to check with the Land Registry and Companies House.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack
You know you want to :)
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Printable View
It's easy to check with the Land Registry and Companies House.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack
You know you want to :)
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
It's the Registers of Scotland not the Land Registry! Looks like that security has been discharged but that is no guarantee there aren't others. Was that the security for the £5 Million.
There were 3 assets secured against the £5m loan, IIRC . The one shown is for the training ground. The others were the car park and.....? .....the intellectual property? (not at work so can't check)Quote:
Originally Posted by wookie70
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Edmiston House.Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
IP ownership was passed to SD but returns to Rangers retail when loan paid back.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Cheers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Looking more carefully at the document posted ,
It is dated 8/1/2016, and is an " Application for the discharge of a security "
The notes on the document state " until completed an application to register is subject to rejection. "
There are no lodgements on the Companies House web site altering Rangers Retail share ownership or the TRFC securities.
https://johnjamessite.wordpress.com/.../11/wifi-woes/
Don't know if this was the source of last weeks arrestment rumours , but somebody's got them up in court tomorrow.
Tomorrow is the day the SD v RIFC contempt case is back in court in London as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by greenginger
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
pQuote:
Originally Posted by greenginger
I think it was this one. The ITK pundits mentioned both this & MA. Another skirmish before the war!
CH won't show anything until the charges have been "satisfied", ie discharged. The share ownership change probably won't appear until the next Annual Return.Quote:
Originally Posted by greenginger
https://twitter.com/jamesdoleman?lang=en
James Doleman covering Sevco's home fixture today . :greengrin
Counsel for Rangers tells court no prospect of insolvency, agrees with judge that there is no firm plan for share issue but is expected
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
802 works are asking court to ringfence money at Rangers due to concerns they will become insolvent legal dispute over Ibrix WiFi settled
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Counsel for Rangers says financial position has improved and lenders are in place; no danger of insolvency
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Court now reviewing various docs on financial position of club.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The total 810 works are asking to be ringfenced is £300, 000
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This business in Glasgow could actually be very interesting today, more interesting than a lot of these silly wee spats in court.
I find it hard to make my mind up what I think about the reality of the financial situation at Ibrox. The Scottish media and Rangers would have us believe that "all is barry" yet the internet is full of bampots telling us they are in deep trouble and facing imminent danger (yet they never seem to topple over the edge).
Am I right in thinking a court is currently debating the short term danger that the club face?
It should be very interesting to see what evidence is put forward and the decision that is taken in the face of that evidence.
It also appears that the judge has also ruled Sevco have to pay £300k. Even if it's not ring fenced that's a result.Quote:
Originally Posted by Smartie
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Chancery Div Royal Courts of JusticeQuote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
COURT 31
Before MR JUSTICE PETER SMITH
Tuesday, 12 January 2016
At half past 10
INTERIM HEARINGS LIST
HC-2015-002185 Sports Direct International Plc v Rangers International Football Club Plc
James Doleman says its just the judgement getting handed down and he should get a copy later today.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brunswickbill
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Wonder how many other folk are waiting on being paid?
Their money will just be resting in the the rangers account. All big teams do it.Quote:
Originally Posted by PatHead
This is how it all starts. Small legal skirmishes, fans dismiss it as the other companies fault etc. Remember when Martin Bain got his redundancy pay off ring fenced before the old Rangers went bust? Seems to be following same pattern.Quote:
Originally Posted by PatHead
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
http://www.philmacgiollabhain.ie/in-the-loop/
Phil claiming the scoop on this wifi case.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Very few companies will go to the expense of court action like this unless there are serious concerns over the solvency of a debtor.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
However, don't be surprised if the judge refuses to find against The Rangers.
Breaking: Counsel for RFC tells Glasgow Sheriff Court that £5m loan to Sports Direct has been repaid.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So that's them paid £10m for that debt?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
Hope pinches of salt were being handed around the court.
Meanwhile in London, no judgment today in case of Sports Direct v Dave King and RFC. Listed hearing just for "case management."
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Help please Oz, I'm confused. Coincidental to my recent post the main part of the article is about Lewis MacLeod but that story, based on the comments, seems to be from Dec 2014. Meanwhile the story about the WIFI seems to be up to date! :confused: Interesting about the offshore aspect of the WIFI also!Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
Not sure myself. The wifi has not been working for about a year now so it could be the company cut them off when the stopped paying. Maybe it's taken a year to get to this stage? Could also be that Phil got lucky with his numbers. [emoji3]Quote:
Originally Posted by brog
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk