Fascinating read that, basically these clubs are so far in debt that they have to gamble on a one off chance to recoup the debts that they owe.
Printable View
That depends. If UEFA still control the bulk of football and can still generate huge revenues this could open the door for clubs like Hibs, Hearts, Aberdeen to compete and benefit from extra European places.
I hope the 12 get tossed out of next season's European competitions, opening up a dozen CL places. Hibs might get dropped straight into the Europa Group stages :greengrin
I think there will be so much opposition across the board for this that it simply won't get enough traction to go ahead. However, if it does, I will quite happily sit and watch from afar while the boat sinks, and be quite thankful that proper fitba will carry on regardless.
One of the Ex players on Sky, basically saying the American model, doesn’t work in Europe. I know the Glaziers borrowed heavy money to buy Man Utd, what is the Liverpool situation with debt?
We now have 3 American type owners in our top league at Aberdeen, Dundee Utd and Hibs. Think United and Aberdeen have a fair bit of debt, not sure they get out of it?
Mother of godQuote:
Originally Posted by Saint Hibee;[URL="tel:6531490"
https://twitter.com/English_AS/status/1384183158929649675?s=20
Really hope they do kick them out the CL and Man United/Arsenal out of the Europa league. That will genuinely show them that it is serious.
Also, there is no way they want their 6 UK franchises concentrated like they are, 3 in London, and 3 in theNorth West of England as they are at the moment. Franchising means moving cities, inevitably. Moscow City or Kuala Lumpur Red Devils, anyone? It’s not like the owners aren’t from Russia or the Gulf or anything :dunno: If you want the NFL/NBA model, accept the consequences.
The Dirty Dozen will be vaccinated against relegation. The others invited to join them will sign whatever terms they're offered. Players, Managers, Commentators, Media, Owners will all be whoring themselves before long, simply because of the money involved.
I'd be absolutely astonished if Celtic and The Rangers have not already been in discussions. Give it a day or two and sentiment towards this breakaway will change. Fans of the 12 will not give a jot about this, or the wider good of the game. They will pay ££££ to support their team.
Someone mentioned Andy Walker earlier on the thread. It might be the clip I watched was different but to be fair to him (as I was ready to criticise him once again as well!) he only appeared to say that Celtic and rangers would jump at the chance and that would be down to money.. he didn’t actually say they SHOULD be involved. Basically calling the old firm what they are, like we all would.
On a totally different point. I was thinking about how often the managers of these English clubs involved are always bleating about having to play at reasonable times at the weekend, after playing midweek in Europe.. yet their clubs are wanting to sign-up to add a regular midweek competition!
Plan is to have a 20 team competition with 15 'permanent' members. The other five places will be competed for via a qualifying competition each season. The intention is to still have teams playing in their domestic competitions on a weekend with ESL games played midweek.
Quite possible that Amazon Prime or Disney will buy up the rights for a Superleague.
Just watched an Internazionale fan in Beijing on the BBC news saying he’s keen on the idea as it’ll mean more competitive games. Says it all really.
Carragher and Neville are spot on. They are ashamed of their clubs :top marks
Equally possible that they won't. If its empty stadiums and players that are effectively embargoed from all other competitions no broadcaster will go near it. I do think these greedy owners are overestimating the interest outside of Europe. How long would people be interested in seeing Man City hammer Arsenal or Real Madrid beat Spurs year on year?