Judge says trial will also rule on lawfulness of confidentiality agreement between SD and RFC
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Printable View
Judge says trial will also rule on lawfulness of confidentiality agreement between SD and RFC
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge asks if Mr Ashley will be giving evidence at trial?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge "Is Mr Ashley going to blame this for the 11% slide in his shares yesterday?"
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Get in! :greengrinQuote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
Judge "Is Mr Ashley going to blame this for the 11% slide in his shares yesterday?" :greengrin
This judge should get struck off. Class A Ticket
Counsel for Sports Direct says he does not think will be possible to go to trial on January " there is the matter of Xmas day"
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This is a sitcom, right? :greengrinQuote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
Judge says any delay in preparation for the trial "will be dealt with severely"
Sets date for Jan 18
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why?Quote:
Originally Posted by underscore
I think he's been excellent. Got to the heart of the issues.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
Come on you Judge! :greengrin
Counsel for Rangers says he has "no problem" with trial date.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaT9E4bKOXw
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Sarf
Hes grand standing...no need for the constants quips. His job is to ensure the law is followed correctly.Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
... which he has done.Quote:
Originally Posted by underscore
Judge says any delay in preparation for the trial "will be dealt with severely" Sets date for Jan 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
Counsel for Rangers say there is no evidence his client was responsible for a Daily Record article from May this year.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge asks for a list of all newspaper articles that SD claim were a breach of the confidentiality agreement.
Gives counsel one week
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Counsel for Rangers says his client cannot see what damage was done to SD by the newspaper articles
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sounds like an admission of guilt to me :greengrinQuote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
Counsel for Rangers "we don't know if they are asking for £200,000 or £200" in damages
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Let me guess??? :greengrinQuote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
On costs judge says he will reserve his decision.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If we are to better Scottish football we have to live in the here and now and goodness knows we do not have our problems to seek. Our national team is down to 52 in the world just behind Gambia and Trinidad.
And yet guys - perhaps even you - think it's all about the Rangers. I'm sorry but I fundamentally disagree.[/QUOTE]
For 4 years, from about 2003, when Oldco were in their pomp, Scotland's rating was much lower than 52. I think we reached 86 at one point. Even in the months before Rangers' liquidation we were rated as 72. There's absolutely no correlation between the demise of Sevco & the Scotland team's ranking. Like others I'm genuinely intrigued as to why you keep beating this empty drum!
Court now discussing an interim confidentiality order to last until trial
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge notes there is a legitimate public interest in this case but issues of confidentiality remain
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge to RFC counsel " perhaps your client should have kept it zipped yesterday" notes there are over 100 news articles on the Internet
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Item no 1.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
That nosey ******* Ozy fi Hibs.net. Tell him to shut the F up.
He has to a point but as underscore says he's also been grandstanding to a considerable extent. He does seem to have started proceedings with a particular agenda in mind. Early on yesterday he asked SD's counsel about the famous ( or infamous ) ****** King hats. I find it hard to believe a London based judge would have had that knowledge if it had not been specifically brought to his attention prior to the trial. I can see MA moving for a mistrial if the judge does not restore some balance.Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Fleece
Yay! :flag: