The judge says he is aware the press have a tendency to invent things. Asks for proof King said something which breached agreement.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Printable View
The judge says he is aware the press have a tendency to invent things. Asks for proof King said something which breached agreement.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge: Mr King may be liable if he knew the order and acted on the impression he was speaking on behalf of Rangers.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge says King may be guilty of contempt but that does not mean Rangers are as no proof board authorised his statement
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Court now being told details of how last court injunction was served on Rangers. Counsel says was sent to their office
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Court shown email sent to King from James Blair about the confidentiality order. SD counsel says proves King untruthful in affadavit.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In Kings affadavit he says he did not fully read the order and did not believe in banned him discussing "the fact of meetings"
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SD arguing over an email from King acknowledging existence of order. Judge querying whether that extended to discussion of meetings.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge: Mr King said that on oath. Do I disbelieve him? You [SD] haven't proved to a criminal standard this extended to discussion of meeting
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SD: Can hardly be clearer he sent an email acknowledging. Judge says King said on oath he didn't read injunction in detail.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge notes that email alone is not proof beyond a reasonable doubt although his affadavit may be "difficult to accept"
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
King statement read out: I did not review the injunction in detail at that time as James Blair had provided restriction in body of email.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In Kings affadavit he states he did not open attachment in email from James Blair
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge: The consequences of going to prison are quite severe for [King]. He could say goodbye going to US for forseeable future (for example)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge notes that King is a "successful businessman" and sending him to prison would have 'serious consequences'
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge asks SD to prove King wilfully disregarded the order. Says SD should have asked for King to be cross-examined in court.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SD: One could hardly look for clearer evidence in him having admitted he received an important email headlined "URGENT: Draft order".
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge questions why SD have not applied for King to give oral evidence as then he could have 'judged his statements for myself"
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SD: There cannot be reasonable doubt he had knowledge of the order.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Counsel for Sports Direct calls King's position "completely implausible"
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This judge sounds very incompetent.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
So just because you are a successful businessman means your exempt form the law and court orders now?
SD: It is wholly implausible Mr King (didn't understand email). Judge retorts that it "amazes me" how people act in this regard these days.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SD: If he was saying I didn't get the email, that would be one thing. He isn't. He's not saying he wasn't aware of the order.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sounds like the judge is leaning towards RIFC
Counsel for SD says they only have to show King's "knowledge of the order" not his "understanding of it"
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Leaning? he is firmly sat on their side of the fenceQuote:
Originally Posted by Benny Brazil
I'm not so sure. I think he is just argumentative. We will see when Sevco lawyer gets up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Benny Brazil
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hibee87
Someone I am aware who was successful businessman was sentenced o2 years in Perth precisely because he was successful. The evidence of 35,000 text messages on his phone relating to drug transactions was kind of damning
Or the law.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hibee87
Seems to be a break just now. Kings defence that he did not bother to read the court judgement is pretty poor, even to my untrained legal mind.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Counsel for SD notes that each director of Rangers was sent a copy of court order.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk