Printable View
fiduciaryQuote:
Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens
A fiduciary is a person who holds a legal or ethical relationship of trust with one or more other parties (person or group of persons). Typically, a fiduciary prudently takes care of money or other asset for another person.
Educational this stuff. Rangers have never been fiduciary for quite a while.
Glib and shameless you might say. Desperate attempt to circle the Hun wagons just as the wheels are coming off. :cbQuote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
Obviously demanding names again even though they knew them all along. They really are an odious institution with not one iota of contrition for their systematic cheating.Quote:
Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens
Wow didnt realise that was from King thought it was from some halfwit on a fans forum.
This bit is particularly offensive:-Quote:
Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens
"the uninformed ramblings of a few outspoken fans to whom attacking Rangers is more important than the wellbeing of their own clubs."
We know that he means Phil and JJ, and the late Paul McConville. But it's insulting to the all of the participants on here, and no doubt on many other boards, whose combined intellect and understanding dwarfs that of the MSM who still fail to ask the important questions.
File under B for Bucket.Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
King is playing a straight bat with Sevconians whilst positioning himself to do well out of Admin2 which must be close when Chuck wins and ring fences some cash.
****, is that a statement from Sevco?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weststandwanab
I'm intrigued. How would that work?
I find it astonishing that The Rangers think that they have any credibility or even a mandate to state how Scottish football should deal with them.
It's akin to a drunk driver telling the police that they don't need to breathalyse them, or the Russian athletics body just saying that they'd have won without the doping anyway so there's no need to look into it now.
Isn't it amazing that the people with the most to lose are the ones trying to tell everyone else that there's no need to do anything?
Can someone remind him of his statement in the daily mail on 19 June 2012 where he states they may have gained an unfair advantage.
That was aimed squarely at internal Hun consumption. All that was missing was a WATP No Surrender sign-off. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by matty_f
Demotion from the Premier League? Does he not understand the process that went on? Rangers weren't demoted, the new club had their application to take over the old club's share turned down. How can the new club be demoted from a league they were never part of in the first place.Quote:
Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens
As for the last paragraph, does he not remember what happened the last time a someone from Rangers said something mildly threatening, Ally McCoists demand to know "who these people are" springs to mind.
Would the threat in the last paragraph not be something that the SFA could charge him for anyway?
Or indeed David Murray's evidence to the tax tribunal where he openly stated that was the whole point of the ******g ebt scheme.Quote:
Originally Posted by GordonHFC
If sevco did go bust again would the line that Chuckles is taking mean that he'd still be getting his fees covered by whoever took over the new sevco mk2?
What is great about the way things are now is that Sevco is the little guy. Any legal battle with a blogger would attract so much crowd funding that the best legal team in the land could be hired.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Oh, Dear.Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
Insulted by a bluenose. However shall we sleep tonight. :wink:
No, he needs them to keep going and the soft loans to keep paying for it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The guys lost it "big time"Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
As I have said before,the SFA has to protect itself,it cannot hide behind the LNS report.
Every time King angers clubs(Scottish/European),Fans and people with agendas(phil and jj) he inflames the situation and increases the number of people calling for the SFA to implement the rules and punishment regarding ineligable players.
That's a pretty good start!Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
It's the threatening sign off that really gets me though. The man is an absolute p****.
There was also the"buy oldco" so they could shut up the "new club brigade"Quote:
Originally Posted by GordonHFC
We really are starting to see the real glib and shameless personality now:greengrin
And I am absolutely focused on the well-being of my own club when I say that Scottish football must punish the cheats.
Unfortunately, I fear that the Huns are too dumb to realise that the people to blame for this sorry mess are not bloggers or rival fans, but the people who have been running their club. Dave King included.
His statement suggests that the pressure is starting to get to him.
I think the new club is in big trouble and the strain is starting to show.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Spot on........Fit and proper, for what?Quote:
Originally Posted by jacomoseven
Good point [emoji6]Quote:
Originally Posted by Kato
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Having read Kings statement and the inaccurate information it contains.
I would suggest the PR set up at Ibrox has become "a free for all"
whos in charge now?
Dave King evens
sons of struth 6/4
level 5 6/1
20/1 bar
Warburton on Fulham's shortlist.
"If the history of our club comes under attack, we will deal with it in the strongest manner possible and will hold to account those persons who have acted against their fiduciary responsibilities to their own clubs and to Scottish football."
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glesgahibby
Lewis Carroll 1/3
CS Lewis 2/1
Ray Bradbury 3/1
Frank L Baum 5/1
Covered in the main meltdown thread.
More faces than the town clock that guy.
He should be cited for his aggressive tone......(And for being a shameless, glib liar)Quote:
Originally Posted by bernz
How SFA passed him as fit and proper beggars belief.........No wonder Ashley taking them to court re that decision
The guy is not of this world. His inane ramblings get more bizarre as each day passes.