@jamesdoleman: Lots of shaking of heads and whispering from the RIFC table at this section of evidence.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Printable View
@jamesdoleman: Lots of shaking of heads and whispering from the RIFC table at this section of evidence.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Be greedy. [emoji3]Quote:
Originally Posted by southsider
You can have both.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@jamesdoleman: Brown, RIFC are acting: "as if the criminal case is some frolic unrelated to his [Green's] duties."
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Interesting feed of info. It'll be interesting to see how the various fictions get untangled in a legal process. No one will come out of this looking very good.
The idea that the club is separate from the company that runs it was a ludicrous position from the outset.
@jamesdoleman: Breaking:The same lawyer acted for Charles Green as acted for Andy Coulson court told.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@jamesdoleman: Court now being shown a contract between "The Rangers Football Club ltd" and Charles Green from September 2012.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Contract back dated to 1/6/12
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@STVGrant: Charles Green's employment contract produced. With "The Rangers Football Club Ltd", which is pointed out as formerly Sevco Scotland.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@jamesdoleman: Brown now moves on to "the vexed question of the mythical concept of the club"
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Glad you added that bit. :greengrinQuote:
Originally Posted by portycabbage
Meanwhile back in court ...
James Doleman @jamesdoleman 24s25 seconds ago
Brown now moves on to "the vexed question of the mythical concept of the club"
Pulls up a chair[emoji3]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@STVGrant: CG lawyer: A club would be an unincorporated association. Lord Doherty interrupts to say that is only one meaning.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@STVGrant: Lord Doherty says it is clear Rangers started out as an unincorporated association.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
James Doleman @jamesdoleman 1m1 minute ago
Brown asks "what does the rest of the world outside football think what a club is."
Judge "club can be used in a number of ways"
Judge says that the "articles of association show Ranger started is a club"
Brown replies this changed when incorporated,
@jamesdoleman: Judge says that the "articles of association show Ranger started is a club"
Brown replies this changed when incorporated,
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@jamesdoleman: Brown "A club can not sign contracts"
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@STVGrant: CG lawyer appears to have a copy of the original Rangers articles of association to hand.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@STVGrant: CG lawyer: From 1872 until 1899, articles of association show Rangers the club was unincorporated.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@jamesdoleman: Brown now quoting from Rangers incorporation document from 1889. Notes it says "takeover the assets" bit does not mention "club"
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@jamesdoleman: Brown says if you wanted to by George Herriots FP (a rugby club in Edinburgh) you would just have to buy the assets.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@STVGrant: CG lawyer: If one today wanted to set up professional rugby club and wanted to buy Heriots FP, there's a distinction between club and assets
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@jamesdoleman: Brown says that there is a difference between the company and the business assets but not between a "club and a company"
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Who's winning and when do we get the result?
Quote:
James Doleman @jamesdoleman 4s4 seconds ago
Brown says that there is a difference between the company and the business assets but not between a "club and a company"
Seriously, all this common sense will never catch on. :wink:
Charlie just threw the seperate club company thing under a bus there[emoji3]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@STVGrant: CG lawyer: If someone wishes to buy the club in this sense, Whyte bought club from Murray as he bought shares in the company
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@STVGrant: "Sevco Scotland did not buy the club. It bought the business assets of the club," says Charles Green's lawyer.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@STVGrant: Lord Doherty: So what was left of the club after all these assets were sold?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The judge may of course revert to fantasy land - this could all hinge on if he's in the same fourball as Nimmo-Smith ...
@STVGrant: CG lawyer: This is a distinction between the failed CVA and the purchase and sale of assets which took place.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk