Sevco go to town

I see they are digging their heels in again even though they are once again wrong. Typical Daily Record article too in saying the ball looked clearly over the line and further in the article says appeared to be over the line . Don’t you just love it when that shower are unhappy and feel aggrieved about something 😆…

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/...seven-35395736

I’ve still not seen a photo that proves it was over the line. The fact the SFA panel think a goal should be awarded because it looks like it might have crossed the line is far more evidence of corruption than anything Sevco are whinging about.

Yet they wanted Hibs done when Irvine Welsh called them Sticky Buns on Hibs TV. Irvine summed them up perfectly as professional victims the day after.

It was an incident in a game that had absolutely nothing riding on it, an end of season dead rubber. If it's that bloody important to them, then they can get their new masters to pay for goal line technology in the premiership :greengrin

**** Rangers. Actually detest that club.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by matty_f

**** Rangers. Actually detest that club.

---

I concur

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jakedance

I’ve still not seen a photo that proves it was over the line. The fact the SFA panel think a goal should be awarded because it looks like it might have crossed the line is far more evidence of corruption than anything Sevco are whinging about.

---

The SFA panel has no standing and is mainly a group of people getting a late pay day and often seems to contain members who don’t actually know the Laws of the Game.

Daily Record, the Hun Pravda.

Well, if they’re not going to win any trophies this season you’ll be damn right they’re winning the statement league !

I think it probably was over the line.

Which I absolutely love. I only wish it had cost them something significant

The hierarchy must have no hope at all in Russell Martin if they are setting up smokescreens already. The only tangible corruption in Scottish Football was the way that the previous Rangers diddled the wage bill and they were suitably punished. Maybe they should pay for anger management courses for John Bomber Brown.

From the article -

Nico Raskin’s effort in the 2-2 last day of the Premiership season draw clearly looked over the line but referee Nick Walsh waved play on.

Hibs went up the pitch and scored, prompting Rangers TV co-commentator Brown to question the integrity of the decision.

Where’s the evidence showing it was clearly over the line? They can greet all they like.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NORTHERNHIBBY

The only tangible corruption in Scottish Football was the way that the previous Rangers diddled the wage bill and they were suitably punished.

---

I can't remember any punishment at all. The club/business were liquidated meaning they lost their licence but they were allowed to start the next in a very advantageous position, that wasn't a punishment.

All their diddled trophies are still in the record books.

Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tamig

From the article -

Nico Raskin’s effort in the 2-2 last day of the Premiership season draw clearly looked over the line but referee Nick Walsh waved play on.

Hibs went up the pitch and scored, prompting Rangers TV co-commentator Brown to question the integrity of the decision.

Where’s the evidence showing it was clearly over the line? They can greet all they like.

---

Like most right-wing institutions in the UK they are deluded, entitled and more than a tad swivel eyed. If more people just laughed at their antics and went about their business we'd all be better off.

Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by matty_f

**** Rangers. Actually detest that club.

---

Not strong enough.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Donegal Hibby

I see they are digging their heels in again even though they are once again wrong. Typical Daily Record article too in saying the ball looked clearly over the line and further in the article says appeared to be over the line . Don’t you just love it when that shower are unhappy and feel aggrieved about something 😆…

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/...seven-35395736

---

Honest to God you'd think they'd lost the league by one goal on goal difference they way they go on, rather than ended up in exactly the same position they would have ended up in, anyway.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jakedance

I’ve still not seen a photo that proves it was over the line. The fact the SFA panel think a goal should be awarded because it looks like it might have crossed the line is far more evidence of corruption than anything Sevco are whinging about.

---

It was actually a decent opportunity to have a sensible debate.

The images used to assist with making those big decisions in our home games with Celtic and Rangers were atrocious.

It’s lucky really that the decisions didn’t end up significantly impacting on anything.

It shouldn’t be hard to get right - the ball is definitively in or out but I don’t think either situation was conclusive one way or the other based on the available evidence.

The narrative should be that we’ve got to give the officials the best chance possible to get these decisions right because we’re not doing that right now. Instead it’s been a pitiful orgy of paranoia and victimhood from 2 rancid institutions and their followers who live for this sort of utter drivel.

Both were great games, should have been considered good Scottish football spectacles and they just end up being forgotten amidst pointless tedium.

I talked about gaslighting with the Celtic and Dundee United decisions that went for us, where the narrative was that you couldn’t tell and that the video evidence was inconclusive.

Now we have “clearly over the line” and no question about whether it was or wasn’t.

Again, it’s gaslighting - we’re just given the narrative that Rangers have been wronged, almost to the point where they’re suggesting Brown was correct to call the SFA corrupt.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Smartie

It was actually a decent opportunity to have a sensible debate.

The images used to assist with making those big decisions in our home games with Celtic and Rangers were atrocious.

It’s lucky really that the decisions didn’t end up significantly impacting on anything.

It shouldn’t be hard to get right - the ball is definitively in or out but I don’t think either situation was conclusive one way or the other based on the available evidence.

The narrative should be that we’ve got to give the officials the best chance possible to get these decisions right because we’re not doing that right now. Instead it’s been a pitiful orgy of paranoia and victimhood from 2 rancid institutions and their followers who live for this sort of utter drivel.

Both were great games, should have been considered good Scottish football spectacles and they just end up being forgotten amidst pointless tedium.

---

:rolleyes:

https://i.ibb.co/93bNshCZ/9-BB44-F1-...43-FD94-DF.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BILLYHIBS

:rolleyes:

https://i.ibb.co/93bNshCZ/9-BB44-F1-...43-FD94-DF.jpg

---

That’s my point though.

Looking right down the line, if there’s daylight like that between the ball and the line, you know it’s out.

At an angle, it’s guesswork.

We all have our opinions - my opinion is that it’s out, based on that picture.

But I wouldn’t say it’s anything like definitive.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Smartie

That’s my point though.

Looking right down the line, if there’s daylight like that between the ball and the line, you know it’s out.

At an angle, it’s guesswork.

We all have our opinions - my opinion is that it’s out, based on that picture.

But I wouldn’t say it’s anything like definitive.

---

It’s definitive it is definitely out that was why VAR overruled it yet to see a definitive image showing the whole ball was over the line in The Rangers goal incident

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BILLYHIBS

It’s definitive it is definitely out that was why VAR overruled it yet to see a definitive image showing the whole ball was over the line in The Rangers goal incident

---

Its not. The pic is taken from a position left of the line. Until you see it from a camera in line, its still speculative. It does look as if its out - but its not conclusive.

Wonder how long into the new season it will take for a statement.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tamig

Its not. The pic is taken from a position left of the line. Until you see it from a camera in line, its still speculative. It does look as if its out - but its not conclusive.

---

Aye ok

I sit in the West South and that is the image burnt into my brain it was out trust me

Suck it up Brenda

Edit

Willie Gollum said the goal should have stood as it was not conclusive but audio from the match seems to point to the AVAR finding a better angle and making a factual decision based on that wonder if they are still in a job ? 😀

https://i.ibb.co/5XS5FKFF/IMG-3602.png

https://i.ibb.co/394zgWTQ/IMG-3603.png

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pagan Hibernia

I think it probably was over the line.

Which I absolutely love. I only wish it had cost them something significant

---

It was definitely a goal, let's be fair. But then again, **** them and their self-entitled word salad statements.

It was probably a goal.... hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BILLYHIBS

Aye ok

I sit in the West South and that is the image burnt into my brain it was out trust me

Suck it up Brenda

Edit

Willie Gollum said the goal should have stood as it was not conclusive but audio from the match seems to point to the AVAR finding a better angle and making a factual decision based on that wonder if they are still in a job ? 😀

https://i.ibb.co/5XS5FKFF/IMG-3602.png

https://i.ibb.co/394zgWTQ/IMG-3603.png

---

Lol. There was no better angle. Its pie in the sky. If there was a better angle we’d all have seen it. Collum would certainly have had access to anything / if it existed. Our VAR system here is pretty pish. Its far from infallible and is probably used more up here for subjective points than to rule on factual matters.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tamig

Lol. There was no better angle. Its pie in the sky. If there was a better angle we’d all have seen it. Collum would certainly have had access to anything / if it existed. Our VAR system here is pretty pish. Its far from infallible and is probably used more up here for subjective points than to rule on factual matters.

---

Agree all I want is for the correct decision to be made win lose or draw but we are gonna need better VAR more cameras goal line technology and automated offside pretty please

But there is conclusive evidence that he said it was corrupt.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gbhibby

But there is conclusive evidence that he said it was corrupt.

---

They're like Violet Elizabeth-Bott.

Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk