The 'Poor' NHS Nurse

Been charged with breach of the peace according to the Sun -
https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/new...ement-_-FBPAGE

her family and friend(s) will pay any fine, they pay for all her holidays as well apparently due to her not being able to live on a paltry 23k/year, poor poor wee thing that she is



i'l wait to see if the scottish daily express/mail print the story

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cabbageandribs1875

her family and friend(s) will pay any fine, they pay for all her holidays as well apparently due to her not being able to live on a paltry 23k/year, poor poor wee thing that she is



i'l wait to see if the scottish daily express/mail print the story

---

I'm rather surprised The Sun has been on it to be honest. I'd have expected to pick it up in The National or the Sunday Herald. Daily Record at a push. But not The Sun.

Given the torrent of abuse she's received over the last week or so it's hardly a shock she's snapped. No one knows the full story, including me, only what the Sun and 'eyewitness' have reported. Given the SNP supporters distrust of the bias media I assume they won't be taking the story as gospel.

I found her claims on TV misleading and she certainly deserved challenged on them, some of that went too far. There's no way of knowing if this is linked to that or not and I'm not sure this fine is relevant either way.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pretty Boy

Given the torrent of abuse she's received over the last week or so it's hardly a shock she's snapped. No one knows the full story, including me, only what the Sun and 'eyewitness' have reported. Given the SNP supporters distrust of the bias media I assume they won't be taking the story as gospel.

I found her claims on TV misleading and she certainly deserved challenged on them, some of that went too far. There's no way of knowing if this is linked to that or not and I'm not sure this fine is relevant either way.

---

Well said.

The hounding of a nurse continues. When are SNP supporters going to realise that others are entitled to opinions whether you like them or not.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lucky

The hounding of a nurse continues. When are SNP supporters going to realise that others are entitled to opinions whether you like them or not.

---

Do you have some evidence that the latest incident was hounding by the SNP?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ronaldo7

Do you have some evidence that the latest incident was hounding by the SNP?

---

I think he may mean those who can't wait to stick the boot in for this incident without knowing the facts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lucky

The hounding of a nurse continues. When are SNP supporters going to realise that others are entitled to opinions whether you like them or not.

---

Aye, that stalwart, SNP supporting paper, the Sun.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by marinello59

I think he may mean those who can't wait to stick the boot in for this incident without knowing the facts.

---

Oh the irony. :wink:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by snooky

Oh the irony. :wink:

---

You'll need to explain that one to me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by marinello59

You'll need to explain that one to me.

---

It's not directed at you, Marinello. It's relating to 'SNP bad' agendas.

Considering the nurses high profile on social media just now, and this incident sounding nothing more than a domestic, was it really necessary to publish where she lives and what car she drives?
There's a small element of idiots out there that would use that information to cause mischief!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speedy_gonzales

Considering the nurses high profile on social media just now, and this incident sounding nothing more than a domestic, was it really necessary to publish where she lives and what car she drives?
There's a small element of idiots out there that would use that information to cause mischief!

---

I agree with you 100%. No need.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speedy_gonzales

Considering the nurses high profile on social media just now, and this incident sounding nothing more than a domestic, was it really necessary to publish where she lives and what car she drives?
There's a small element of idiots out there that would use that information to cause mischief!

---

They shouldn't have released such information. However, I can understand why they did it. The article claims that the person being abused wasn't provoking her at all. So I assume there must have been eye witnesses, otherwise they wouldn't have gotten away with making such a claim.

I wouldn't have mentioned the nurse again if it wasn't for this. So the sensitive souls can put their dummies away now. :dummytit:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by High-On-Hibs

I wouldn't have mentioned the nurse again if it wasn't for this. So the sensitive souls can put their dummies away now. :dummytit:

---

Any need?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by marinello59

Any need?

---

Any need for the usual SNP nasty cult chat? You don't put people in their place for that nonsense, you're quite happy to join in.

I'm personally glad she's been booked. Justice was served, she got what she deserved. :smug:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by snooky

Aye, that stalwart, SNP supporting paper, the Sun.

---

Did the sun not back the SNP at the ladt two elections?

I seem to remeber salmond getting very cosy with rupert murdo h and / or his employees at bute house.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SouthsideHarp_Bhoy

Did the sun not back the SNP at the ladt two elections?

I seem to remeber salmond getting very cosy with rupert murdo h and / or his employees at bute house.

---

Well considering Murdoch and his chums control around 95% of the British media, the SNP had to do something to get on his good side. It's not easy being the 45% with about 2% representation in the media if we're lucky.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by High-On-Hibs

Any need for the usual SNP nasty cult chat? You don't put people in their place for that nonsense, you're quite happy to join in.

I'm personally glad she's been booked. Justice was served, she got what she deserved. :smug:

---

well said

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by High-On-Hibs

Well considering Murdoch and his chums control around 95% of the British media, the SNP had to do something to get on his good side. It's not easy being the 45% with about 2% representation in the media if we're lucky.

---

Sorry, was that a yes? So the sun arent anti SNP then?

95%? Behave.

The Times, the Sun, Sky.

What about ITV, BBC, C4 and all the other papers, not to mention online?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SouthsideHarp_Bhoy

Sorry, was that a yes? So the sun arent anti SNP then?

95%? Behave.

The Times, the Sun, Sky.

What about ITV, BBC, C4 and all the other papers, not to mention online?

---

My apologies.

96%

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by High-On-Hibs

My apologies.

96%

---

Ha ha, touche!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by snooky

Aye, that stalwart, SNP supporting paper, the Sun.

---

Attachment 18674

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by marinello59

Any need?

---

I'm as pro-yes as anyone and think the BBC regularly stitch up anything which doesn't conform to the mainstream Westminster consensus. I don't even pay the licence fee or have TV for that very reason.

However, people have to drop this. It's doing no-ones cause any good whatsoever.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by steakbake

I'm as pro-yes as anyone and think the BBC regularly stitch up anything which doesn't conform to the mainstream Westminster consensus. I don't even pay the licence fee or have TV for that very reason.

However, people have to drop this. It's doing no-ones cause any good whatsoever.

---

It was new news, which is why I posted it. It's not like I dug up the exact same story as before. :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by steakbake

I'm as pro-yes as anyone and think the BBC regularly stitch up anything which doesn't conform to the mainstream Westminster consensus. I don't even pay the licence fee or have TV for that very reason.

However, people have to drop this. It's doing no-ones cause any good whatsoever.

---

:agree: Enough of nurse Claire already. :rolleyes:

I'm absolutely sure the Beeb has an anti-Indy agenda but NS laid the groundwork to turn this into a +ve spin for the SNP (nurses slightly better treated here) and the SNP spinners sadly ****** it up (nurse attacks, yawn).

The Sun is pro SNP in Scotland, absolutely hates them in it's English editions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens

:agree: Enough of nurse Claire already. :rolleyes:

I'm absolutely sure the Beeb has an anti-Indy agenda but NS laid the groundwork to turn this into a +ve spin for the SNP (nurses slightly better treated here) and the SNP spinners sadly ****** it up (nurse attacks, yawn).

---

It's the folk on twitter copying in the Royal College of Nursing into the latest story. Madness.

They'll find out in their own way and pick through if there's a case to be answered such as through her management or her annual re-registration. They don't need folks on twitter pursuing a witch hunt.

What possible human benefit would there be to seeing her lose her livelihood and then, ironically, getting into the very same financial problems she claimed she had in the debate.

Pro-yessers have to convince and understand no voters. Mounting a vendetta to destroy someone who, for their own reasons, embellished their situation to make a political point on a political show is not a good look.

Have pointed that out to a couple of fools today who then played the man and not the argument.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by High-On-Hibs

It was new news, which is why I posted it. It's not like I dug up the exact same story as before. :rolleyes:

---

I get it, but perhaps with the tinfoil hat on, this is exactly what opponents want - feeding someone to the sharks then complaining there's been a shark attack.

Not having a go at you specifically but beyond this, there's all sorts of sh**e being stirred which is not encouraging for neutrals and the yet-to-be convinced.