Log in

View Full Version : Ryan Jack compliance officer



JimBHibees
22-02-2022, 08:08 AM
Surely his tackle on Sunday is being pulled up. Notice Sportscene showed the tackle but bottled out of discussing it.

Heisenberg
22-02-2022, 08:14 AM
Surely his tackle on Sunday is being pulled up. Notice Sportscene showed the tackle but bottled out of discussing it.

Can guarantee if it was Porteous there would’ve been non stop coverage on it. Daily Record would’ve churned out about 10 articles since Sunday declaring him a danger to society and in need of a ban.

green day
22-02-2022, 08:19 AM
Can guarantee if it was Porteous there would’ve been non stop coverage on it. Daily Record would’ve churned out about 10 articles since Sunday declaring him a danger to society and in need of a ban.

:top marks

Danderhall Hibs
22-02-2022, 08:23 AM
Surely his tackle on Sunday is being pulled up. Notice Sportscene showed the tackle but bottled out of discussing it.

Spent longer on a non-existent handball and decided to keep their windows in tact.

Hopefully the CO saw it.

dchibs
22-02-2022, 08:28 AM
Surprised they even showed it on that programme.

green day
22-02-2022, 08:38 AM
We have video where a "Ryan" actually did something, thats a novelty this morning..................:greengrin

Danderhall Hibs
22-02-2022, 08:45 AM
We have video where a "Ryan" actually did something, thats a novelty this morning..................:greengrin

:greengrin And we want someone to send the video to the SFA to punish and embarrass him.

hibsbollah
22-02-2022, 09:13 AM
We have video where a "Ryan" actually did something, thats a novelty this morning..................:greengrin

To be fair, a few players could be in hot water. Some of them were definitely in the vicinity, may have been Ryan Jack’s mates, and may even have seen the offence being committed.

Joe6-2
22-02-2022, 07:05 PM
How in Gods green earth did he get away with that?!
Oh yeah, it’s the jersey he wears

gbhibby
22-02-2022, 08:07 PM
Not the first time Ryan Jack has been guilty of a shocking tackle, Red card all day long.

Gloucester Hibs
22-02-2022, 08:10 PM
Mind the time Stokesy flicked his Baws and got him sent off? 😍

Carheenlea
22-02-2022, 08:17 PM
To be fair, a few players could be in hot water. Some of them were definitely in the vicinity, may have been Ryan Jack’s mates, and may even have seen the offence being committed.

:hilarious

The 90+2
22-02-2022, 08:18 PM
Decent player.

I can't believe it's became so blatant a hun player becomes compliance officer though.

Del Boy
22-02-2022, 08:22 PM
The kid’s not learning

007
22-02-2022, 08:33 PM
Thought I'd heard on the radio yesterday that the Compliance Officer would be looking at it but I don't see anything on the SFA website. Think it is usually there within a day or two so it looks like he's got away with it, surprise surprise.

https://www.scottishfa.co.uk/scottish-fa/football-governance/disciplinary/disciplinary-updates/

PatHead
22-02-2022, 08:55 PM
STV news said no action would be taken against him or Mulgrew. Don't know what Mulgrew did but it obviously makes it fair.

The 90+2
22-02-2022, 09:17 PM
STV news said no action would be taken against him or Mulgrew. Don't know what Mulgrew did but it obviously makes it fair.


The most obvious was the boy who pulled the hun lad back and was a penalty/sending off. Think he got off with a handball and scored the goal too.

Wee shame, eh :greengrin

JimBHibees
22-02-2022, 09:21 PM
STV news said no action would be taken against him or Mulgrew. Don't know what Mulgrew did but it obviously makes it fair.

Laughable in comparison to Porto. Corrupt as.

Del Boy
22-02-2022, 09:22 PM
STV news said no action would be taken against him or Mulgrew. Don't know what Mulgrew did but it obviously makes it fair.

They were maybe looking at taking action against Mulgrew for making light of the The Rangers penalty claims.

hibbysam
22-02-2022, 09:29 PM
They were maybe looking at taking action against Mulgrew for making light of the The Rangers penalty claims.

It was for a tackle on Arfield. Wasn’t pretty.

darwenhibby
22-02-2022, 09:30 PM
No doubt Ryan Porteous has been offered a 2 game ban for the tackle
It fizzin stinks

007
23-02-2022, 03:05 PM
Check out the Twitter clips under the article.

https://videocelts.com/2022/02/blogs/latest-news/sfa-decide-not-to-take-retrospective-action-against-ryan-jack-over-brutal-tannadice-incident/

hibsbollah
23-02-2022, 03:51 PM
Check out the Twitter clips under the article.

https://videocelts.com/2022/02/blogs/latest-news/sfa-decide-not-to-take-retrospective-action-against-ryan-jack-over-brutal-tannadice-incident/

He actually does what he wants.

CmoantheHibs
23-02-2022, 04:03 PM
That’s the first time I’ve seen the tackle. It is undoubtedly a red card. Not sure how anybody could argue against it. Reckless and out of control. If the compliance officer has looked at that and decided there is no case to answer then he needs to be looking for a new job.

Carheenlea
23-02-2022, 05:13 PM
Maybe it’s time to scrap retrospective punishment via the compliance officer.

Not a level playing field when some players are being offered match bans but others not for like for like offences. The system is not fit for purpose.

And folk want to see VAR in Scotland..?

loanheadhibby
23-02-2022, 06:08 PM
STV news said no action would be taken against him or Mulgrew. Don't know what Mulgrew did but it obviously makes it fair.

There’s surely no way the Compliance officer won’t take retrospective action? That’s a red card all day long.

greenlex
23-02-2022, 06:17 PM
There’s surely no way the Compliance officer won’t take retrospective action? That’s a red card all day long.
Nothing to see here. Move along now.

Sir David Gray
23-02-2022, 06:20 PM
The next time a Hibs player is cited by the Compliance Officer we should go to town with our complaint.

Spike Mandela
23-02-2022, 06:28 PM
STV news said no action would be taken against him or Mulgrew. Don't know what Mulgrew did but it obviously makes it fair.

Doesn’t make it fair to all others pulled up by the compliance officer. A clear red card overlooked or missed by the referee is bread and butter to the compliance officer but they ‘choose’ to do nothing.

SFA aren’t even discrete about their cheating and corruption now. Nobody to blame but ourselves though. When clubs like Hibs rejected the push for an independent inquiry into the EBT scandal and SFA whitewash the game was up. Rangers knew they could do as they please with full SFA complicity.

loanheadhibby
23-02-2022, 06:30 PM
Nothing to see here. Move along now.

Unbelievable! Was there a reason it’s not being looked at? Probably as Ryan Jack did not actually break the guys leg. Or the Utd player should not have had his leg there in 1st place.

Can you imagine if Porto made that challenge.

HibbyAndy
23-02-2022, 06:38 PM
Doesn’t make it fair to all others pulled up by the compliance officer. A clear red card overlooked or missed by the referee is bread and butter to the compliance officer but they ‘choose’ to do nothing.

SFA aren’t even discrete about their cheating and corruption now. Nobody to blame but ourselves though. When clubs like Hibs rejected the push for an independent inquiry into the EBT scandal and SFA whitewash the game was up. Rangers knew they could do as they please with full SFA complicity.

:agree:

And yet people on here still think it's poor refereeing , Scottish football is 100% corrupt to the core , Has been for a very long time

Aldo
23-02-2022, 06:56 PM
:agree:

And yet people on here still think it's poor refereeing , Scottish football is 100% corrupt to the core , Has been for a very long time

Totally and once again the CO has made their decision on the team they play for. It really is that simple.

Do people think VAR will make a difference?? It’ll be the same dodgy officials.

Biggest thing for me is there is zero consistency and teams like the OF benefit from it even though it’s clear to all. Sportscene etc also play a part in all this. Analysing certain teams and tackles whilst they just breeze over others ie OF


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

gbhibby
23-02-2022, 06:59 PM
If the compliance officer has not acted upon the Jack tackle it needs to be done away with as there is no consistency in the decisions made by them.
The refs have to make decisions in a split second these people have all the time in the world and different camera angles. It seems to depend on what team you play for.

Pedantic_Hibee
23-02-2022, 07:11 PM
Out and out corruption. Why are other clubs not kicking off about this?

blackpoolhibs
23-02-2022, 07:35 PM
Out and out corruption. Why are other clubs not kicking off about this?

Because the game is fixed, yet there are still some folk who post on here who will tell you it's not.

Danderhall Hibs
23-02-2022, 08:10 PM
Because the game is fixed, yet there are still some folk who post on here who will tell you it's not.

We’ve been gaslighted - it’s been corrupt / weighted in their favour for years but we keep accepting it and paying our money.

Carheenlea
23-02-2022, 08:10 PM
Unbelievable! Was there a reason it’s not being looked at? Probably as Ryan Jack did not actually break the guys leg. Or the Utd player should not have had his leg there in 1st place.

Can you imagine if Porto made that challenge.

Porto would be given a two match ban and put on the Sex Offenders Register.

The Harp Awakes
23-02-2022, 08:18 PM
Out and out corruption. Why are other clubs not kicking off about this?

Head above the parapet stuff and too many snouts in the trough. As another poster pointed out, the game was goosed with the failure of clubs to back an independent inquiry into the EBT scandal. Rod Petrie was after the top SFA job so Hibs were never going to support an inquiry.

The game in Scotland has always been corrupt. Have the Rangers been censured about going public on Kevin Clancy? No chance whereas every other club in the land would be hauled over the coals.

hibsbollah
23-02-2022, 08:18 PM
Porto would be given a two match ban and put on the Sex Offenders Register.

:agree: seek asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy