PDA

View Full Version : Why no Harry (Mavrias)



California-Hibs
03-11-2018, 05:02 PM
Why the hell did he not come on today?? Apparently a very dangerous winger, needs the minutes to build up his fitness, yet we're bringing on McGregor, Slivka and Shaw infront of him, two defensive players when we're going for a goal?!

Shocking.

Centre Hawf
03-11-2018, 05:12 PM
Agreed. Would have rather we brought him on for Whittaker if I'm being honest (I remember someone saying he plays RWB too?)

Also where is Nelom? Not suggesting he would have sorted us out today but I'm just wondering if these two lads are the typical after transfer window signings that float off into obscurity again come January (Neal Eardley for example)

Ozyhibby
03-11-2018, 05:24 PM
This seasons Rherras.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Diclonius
03-11-2018, 05:25 PM
A player who is fit enough to be on the bench but not fit enough to play. Why?

Deeds
03-11-2018, 05:25 PM
...and HIBS ruined my coupon...ragin

Mr Grieves
03-11-2018, 05:29 PM
This seasons Rherras.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Surely Nelom is this season's Rherras?

calumhibee1
03-11-2018, 08:19 PM
This seasons Rherras.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I could see Nelsom and Harry never making an appearance.

B.H.F.C
03-11-2018, 08:23 PM
Pointless signing.

Cover/competition for Gray. He’s not there and Whittaker plays. Whittaker goes off then Efe goest to right back. Boyle ended up at wing back as well.

If he can’t get on the pitch despite all that will he ever?

J-C
03-11-2018, 08:29 PM
He's only signed till January so what's the point, it'll be January soon and he'll still not be fit.

wookie70
03-11-2018, 08:58 PM
Was there not any 6 foot plus strikers out of contract rather than getting cover for a position we are well covered in.