snooky
03-10-2017, 10:39 AM
https://wingsoverscotland.com/
To me this article in WoS about Nick Robinson seems to have missed the point.
IIRC, what was offensive was the BBC's editing of the Q/A time in that Salmond's answer on the telly report was not his response to the question originally asked. IMO it was deliberate editing to deceive. The BBC said later it was an unintentional error (to paraphrase). Aye, right. The editing deception point doesn't appear to come across in the HIGNFY clip or in the Rev/NR interchanging tweets(?).
Does anybody agree with me about the point being missed?
To me this article in WoS about Nick Robinson seems to have missed the point.
IIRC, what was offensive was the BBC's editing of the Q/A time in that Salmond's answer on the telly report was not his response to the question originally asked. IMO it was deliberate editing to deceive. The BBC said later it was an unintentional error (to paraphrase). Aye, right. The editing deception point doesn't appear to come across in the HIGNFY clip or in the Rev/NR interchanging tweets(?).
Does anybody agree with me about the point being missed?