Hibbyradge
23-03-2017, 09:42 AM
This popped up as a memory on my FB, but I can't remember what Lennon wss talking about or the outcome of McCall's appeal.
He talks about the decision costing Celtic the treble, but it can't have been the SC final. Maybe FB have the date wrong.
Can anyone shed any light on it?
. A memory from 2012
This was posted on Hibs.Net and makes a very good point...
Consistency
Quite delighted to see Stuart McCall refusing to take the offered one match ban from the SFA after his "outburst" at the Scottish Cup game vs Aberdeen last weekend.
There is absolutely no level of consistency with which managers are being hauled over the coals in relation to their comments/interactions with referees - an example:
Originally Posted by
Jim McIntyre
“For the second goal, the ref has had a nightmare. I’ve just watched it on video and it was never a penalty. It was a really, really poor decision.”
The result of the above was a 2 match ban.
Originally Posted by
Stuart McCall
”When you see it on TV, you will be embarrassed.”
The result of the above was sent to the stand and a 1 game ban offered
Originally Posted by
Neil Lennon
"It's a stonewall penalty. It's a shocking decision, absolutely shocking. He is clean through, holding the boy off, the guy lunges at him and he takes his legs away.
The defender doesn't get anywhere near the ball so it's a penalty and a red card in the final minute of the game where we have banged away at the door. For me it's a criminal decision and it has cost us the Treble.
I have only just seen the incident again there on the TV five or ten minutes ago from every angle. So how he can make that decision from where he was I don't know. To rub salt in the wounds he books Anthony for diving, which is awful. Awful refereeing."
The result of the above? Nothing. No discussions, no comments from the SFA - nada. As a result of this, Willie Collum has been subject of a barrage of sectarian abuse and threats on Twitter
(http://i43.tinypic.com/33jjry9.jpg), (http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/sc...6908-23794978/)
He has now been asked today 5 days later to explain his comments.
The double standards are sickening.
http://i43.tinypic.com/33jjry9.jpg
i43.tinypic.com
He talks about the decision costing Celtic the treble, but it can't have been the SC final. Maybe FB have the date wrong.
Can anyone shed any light on it?
. A memory from 2012
This was posted on Hibs.Net and makes a very good point...
Consistency
Quite delighted to see Stuart McCall refusing to take the offered one match ban from the SFA after his "outburst" at the Scottish Cup game vs Aberdeen last weekend.
There is absolutely no level of consistency with which managers are being hauled over the coals in relation to their comments/interactions with referees - an example:
Originally Posted by
Jim McIntyre
“For the second goal, the ref has had a nightmare. I’ve just watched it on video and it was never a penalty. It was a really, really poor decision.”
The result of the above was a 2 match ban.
Originally Posted by
Stuart McCall
”When you see it on TV, you will be embarrassed.”
The result of the above was sent to the stand and a 1 game ban offered
Originally Posted by
Neil Lennon
"It's a stonewall penalty. It's a shocking decision, absolutely shocking. He is clean through, holding the boy off, the guy lunges at him and he takes his legs away.
The defender doesn't get anywhere near the ball so it's a penalty and a red card in the final minute of the game where we have banged away at the door. For me it's a criminal decision and it has cost us the Treble.
I have only just seen the incident again there on the TV five or ten minutes ago from every angle. So how he can make that decision from where he was I don't know. To rub salt in the wounds he books Anthony for diving, which is awful. Awful refereeing."
The result of the above? Nothing. No discussions, no comments from the SFA - nada. As a result of this, Willie Collum has been subject of a barrage of sectarian abuse and threats on Twitter
(http://i43.tinypic.com/33jjry9.jpg), (http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/sc...6908-23794978/)
He has now been asked today 5 days later to explain his comments.
The double standards are sickening.
http://i43.tinypic.com/33jjry9.jpg
i43.tinypic.com