PDA

View Full Version : Boyle's Goal


Andy JR
15-11-2016, 03:44 PM
Has anyone seen footage? Confirmed it was offside?
Unseen work
15-11-2016, 04:23 PM
I have seen it from hibs tv footage and it was hard to say.

Probably would of favoured the attacker in that scenario.

Also, not one Falkirk player asked for offside
danhibees1875
15-11-2016, 05:51 PM
I think someone posted a screenshot in a separate thread - he was off by about a yard.
snooky
15-11-2016, 05:57 PM
I think someone posted a screenshot in a separate thread - he was off by about a yard.

That's onside in OF terms :cool2:
Galahibby
15-11-2016, 06:13 PM
My recollection was that they had a man on the line. Funny the tricks your mind can play on you when you start getting old :wink:
Hermit Crab
15-11-2016, 06:15 PM
My recollection was that they had a man on the line. Funny the tricks your mind can play on you when you start getting old :wink:


Was he not behind the keeper though? That would make him offside as you need two men behind the keeper to play you on.
lapsedhibee
15-11-2016, 06:24 PM
Was he not behind the keeper though? That would make him offside as you need two men behind the keeper to play you on.

:tsk tsk:
mim
15-11-2016, 06:31 PM
Was he not behind the keeper though? That would make him offside as you need two men behind the keeper to play you on.

2 men (which may include the keeper) nearer to the goal line than the ball. :wink:
Skol
15-11-2016, 06:45 PM
I didnt see a pass being made as Holy went down and wondered how he could have been offside, would like to see it again
RabMohr
15-11-2016, 06:57 PM
Just watched it on Hibs TV and Boyle is at least a yard offside when the pass is made to him.
NORTHERNHIBBY
15-11-2016, 07:28 PM
Offside by a distance. Did not hear much complaints.
worcesterhibby
15-11-2016, 07:55 PM
My recollection was that they had a man on the line. Funny the tricks your mind can play on you when you start getting old :wink:


They did when he shot, but not when he received the ball.

this is the moment that the ball was passed...Squirrel is about a yard off.

17638
Badge
15-11-2016, 08:39 PM
Was he not behind the keeper though? That would make him offside as you need two men behind the keeper to play you on.
What?
Billy Whizz
15-11-2016, 08:40 PM
What?

😂😂😂😂
HoboHarry
15-11-2016, 09:30 PM
Was he not behind the keeper though? That would make him offside as you need two men behind the keeper to play you on.
What version of FIFA Manager do you have? Is your defense really good per chance? :greengrin
snooky
15-11-2016, 09:50 PM
:tsk tsk:

:wink: :aok:
Galahibby
15-11-2016, 10:37 PM
Now I'm even more confused. Do I not understand the offside rule, do I have a **** memory, or do I just need new contact lenses? :greengrin
HoboHarry
15-11-2016, 11:16 PM
Now I'm even more confused. Do I not understand the offside rule, do I have a **** memory, or do I just need new contact lenses? :greengrin
Yes to all...... :greengrin
Forza Fred
15-11-2016, 11:45 PM
Was he not behind the keeper though? That would make him offside as you need two men behind the keeper to play you on.

:confused:
Future17
16-11-2016, 12:43 PM
I think HC is correct (although it maybe could have been worded better).

You need two opposition players between you and the goal line in order to be onside. This is usually the keeper plus one "outfield" player. However, if you're behind the keeper (as in between the keeper and the goal line, you would need two "outfield" players between you and the goal line in order to be onside.
snooky
16-11-2016, 01:35 PM
I think HC is correct (although it maybe could have been worded better).

You need two opposition players between you and the goal line in order to be onside. This is usually the keeper plus one "outfield" player. However, if you're behind the keeper (as in between the keeper and the goal line, you would need two "outfield" players between you and the goal line in order to be onside.

:agree: I think the confusion arises with the use of the word 'keeper'.
As F17 states, it's "opposition players" - irrespective of their assigned position in the team.
lapsedhibee
16-11-2016, 03:01 PM
I think HC is correct (although it maybe could have been worded better).

You need two opposition players between you and the goal line in order to be onside. This is usually the keeper plus one "outfield" player. However, if you're behind the keeper (as in between the keeper and the goal line, you would need two "outfield" players between you and the goal line in order to be onside.

Ah yes, "behind the keeper" as in 'ahead of the keeper'. Makes sense now. :agree: