View Full Version : Official Site: 2016-17 SQUAD NUMBERS ANNOUNCED
RSS Bot
13-07-2016, 01:00 PM
More... (http://www.hibernianfc.co.uk/news/6626)
hibs0666
13-07-2016, 01:01 PM
More... (http://www.hibernianfc.co.uk/news/6626)
1 and 3 still to be assigned...
Brightside
13-07-2016, 01:08 PM
1 and 3 still to be assigned...
Surprised Martin and Shaw are not on the list
stantonhibby
13-07-2016, 01:17 PM
Did we not have a number 7 last season?
Vault Boy
13-07-2016, 01:20 PM
Did we not have a number 7 last season?
King Dom.
stantonhibby
13-07-2016, 01:22 PM
King Dom.
Of course how could I forget !
BroxburnHibee
13-07-2016, 01:25 PM
1 and 3 still to be assigned...
3 was Hendo's number :hmmm:
erin go bragh
13-07-2016, 01:30 PM
3 was Hendo's number :hmmm:
Hope so BH . 7 free for Commons :)
Hope so BH . 7 free for Commons :)
He better ask McGinn 1st as that's his number now.
Vault Boy
13-07-2016, 01:37 PM
Hope so BH . 7 free for Commons :)
For the sake of argument it's probably worth noting that our regular left back doesn't take the number 3 and we are yet to add another one to the squad, and 7 will only be free for Commons if he fights meatbaw head for it, which wouldn't go well for Kris. :greengrin
Definitely hoping Hendo will sign and I'm trusting of those who suggest it will happen!
hibsbollah
13-07-2016, 01:37 PM
Kontes #18 still free. A triumphal return? Or maybe we retired it...
Mr White
13-07-2016, 01:38 PM
He better ask McGinn 1st as that's his number now.
He could take 07 if he wants it :greengrin
Billy Whizz
13-07-2016, 01:41 PM
He could take 07 if he wants it :greengrin
Or 01
Vault Boy
13-07-2016, 01:42 PM
He could take 07 if he wants it :greengrin
Was thinking about Riordan's infamous 01 the other day. Incidentally I don't think he could actually have 07 as one of the reasons Derek was allowed 01 was because we didn't have a GK registered as the number 1. :nerd:
Mr White
13-07-2016, 01:44 PM
Was thinking about Riordan's infamous 01 the other day. Incidentally I don't think he could actually have 07 as one of the reasons Derek was allowed 01 was because we didn't have a GK registered as the number 1. :nerd:
That makes sense now actually!
JeMeSouviens
13-07-2016, 02:06 PM
Remarkable continuity. It must be a good few years since we started a season with much the same core of the squad we finished the last?
Billy Whizz
13-07-2016, 02:14 PM
Surprised Martin and Shaw are not on the list
Or Crane, unless these 3 are going out on loan
Jonnyboy
13-07-2016, 02:21 PM
Interesting to see who's listed at #15
Billy Whizz
13-07-2016, 02:22 PM
Interesting to see who's listed at #15
Why
Jonnyboy
13-07-2016, 02:23 PM
There had been suggestions that he was on his way but seems unlikely given he's listed in the first team squad, Billy
Billy Whizz
13-07-2016, 02:29 PM
There had been suggestions that he was on his way but seems unlikely given he's listed in the first team squad, Billy
Think I saw that posted somewhere
livi hibs 1875
13-07-2016, 02:31 PM
Thought they would all be fighting over 23
ShadesLongThrow
13-07-2016, 02:39 PM
Does anyone else hark back to the days where the first choice were numbers 1 to 11? Assuming we do eventually have a 1 and 3, it's highly unlikely we'll ever see this 1 to 11 playing together.
Oranje39
13-07-2016, 02:52 PM
Kontes #18 still free. A triumphal return? Or maybe we retired it...
I'm sure the big guy was 19.
SHODAN
13-07-2016, 03:21 PM
I'm sure the big guy was 19.
He was.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.