Who's the Bigger Club, Rotherham or The Rangers

[Keith_M]

As Rotherham's first bid for Scott Allan is reportedly £100,000 more than The Rangers third bid, who do we think are the bigger Club?



Vote Now



:wink:

[lord bunberry]

It's obviously Rotherham as they've bid the larger amount. I heard it was cash up front as well. Tbh I'd be pretty embarrassed if I was a Rangers fan.

[Keith_M]

#wheresdavekingsmillions

[Canon Hannan]

Rotherham play at a higher level and have far more money.
SEVCO 2012 have a larger stadium, better academy and larger fan base.
Rotherham will pay him more.

[Elephant Stone]

Sevco have the potential to be the bigger club and may one day be able to afford our players. They may even be able to outbid Rotherham. At the moment, though, with 90 years of unblemished history and seemingly greater spending power, Rotherham must be seen to be the bigger club.

[Keith_M]

Who voted for the wee sleekit club?


:tsk tsk:

[Pete]

Hearts.

[Billy McKirdy]

Who voted for the wee sleekit club?


:tsk tsk:

I did :greengrin

I thought it said bigoted club

[HUTCHYHIBBY]

I've never liked Rotherham since I trekked down there for a Hammers game when Roeder caused a fuss about the changing rooms and West Ham managed to lose. IIRC Defoe got sent off too.

[Arch Stanton]

If the verbal agreement really was to let SA go if a big club came in for him then I'd say Rotherham fit the bill nicely - they play in England ffs.

[HUTCHYHIBBY]

If the verbal agreement really was to let SA go if a big club came in for him then I'd say Rotherham fit the bill nicely - they play in England ffs.

So do the old Rangers of the Berwick variety.

[ehf]

Did we not get Gareth Evans from Rotherham?

[Malthibby]

More money, more cups (one, apparently), more history (well over four years of it).
No contest.
GG

[Pretty Boy]

One has a history stretching back 90 years in the lower levels of the game in their country, have won 3 lower leagues, have reached the final of one of the major trophies in their country and won a trophy exclusively for lower league sides.

The other has been remarkably successful in a short space of time. Founded in 2012 they have won 2 lower league titles, been beaten in the final of the Petrofac Cup by a team with a far richer history and been beaten play off finalist, being denied an almost remarkable rise to the Premiership for the 1st time in their history in only 3 seasons.

It's a tough call but on heritage alone it has to be Rotherham.

[xyz23jc]

#wheresdavekingsmillions


:faf:http://www.hibs.net/images/smilies/thumbs%20up.gif:agree:

[Carheenlea]

Hibs are a bigger than Rotheram.

[Sir David Gray]

Rotherham just now but Sevco certainly have the potential for bigger things in the future.

Give them time FFS, they're only three years old!

[LancashireHibby]

Chuckle Brothers > Bigot Brothers

[Bostonhibby]

Its Rotherham obviously as they have had time to build a history, traditions etc, but to be fair the answer would be totally different if the question was which club has stolen the most money/bumped the most creditors/ owner has the most tax convictions etc...............................