Bevvy coming?

[One Day Soon]

You're off topic again.
Ed Balls. Whats your beef?

Starts fights in empty rooms he does. A very bright lad, but a bit of a fire ship.

[One Day Soon]

Unless she has said the things you are saying, then it is all about interpretation. Her statement can be taken more than one way, and you feel that this is what she meant.

Obviously, in terms of pure logic every person's perspective on what someone else has said is a matter of interpretation. If it wasn't then we wouldn't have Hibs.net.

My interpretation is that she was suggesting Murphy has made a mistake in thinking these things. Again that's her interpretation of what he was saying though.

I think she was disparaging him, supporters and others who have a view on this - such as the St Mirren Chairman Stewart Gilmore to name one.

I have to say, I admire your ability to stick to an argument in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. So far you have reinterpreted George Orwell (wrongly) and put words in the mouth of the woman who sent the tweet.

I haven't seen much 'evidence' to the contrary produced here, but I have seen a fair bit of evasion and missing the point about this debate.

I have not reinterpreted Orwell, neither have I put words into the mouth of anyone (incidentally I think it is curious that you refer to her as a woman rather than an MSP, her day job is surely more relevant than her gender here). The use of that Orwell quote as a tweet in the context of this debate is, at best, ill judged. It certainly contributes eff all to the debate on whether alcohol should be sold at games. As football supporters I think we deserve a better level of engagement on this proposal than this MSP's tweet offered. Why shouldn't we be treated as seriously as the spectators of other sports?

Any idea who killed the Lindbergh baby?

No, I'm better on European history than US. But my interpretation is that you weren't really asking me if I knew the answer to your question...