PDA

View Full Version : Yams Do hearts ever finish a game against 11 men?



Monts
02-02-2014, 01:37 PM
Incredible

Borderhibbie76
02-02-2014, 01:39 PM
Its becoming a total joke...everything going their way of late

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

Borderhibbie76
02-02-2014, 01:40 PM
Incidentally yogi appears to have destroyed a decent ICT side???

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

HIBERNIAN-0762
02-02-2014, 01:40 PM
Never a foul in the first place and to top it off an og for the goal, utterly spawny team

Willis1875
02-02-2014, 01:44 PM
There last 4 games have seen opposition players sent off

Geo_1875
02-02-2014, 01:45 PM
Refs lost the plot. Foul every time they throw themselves to the ground yet ICT denied a stonewalled penalty for a shove from behind.

matty_f
02-02-2014, 01:46 PM
Luckiest team on the bloody planet. It's unbelievable.

Bighoose
02-02-2014, 01:47 PM
If all your players throw themselves theatrically to the ground every time a opposition players goes near them, well the ref is bound to buy it enough.

Aldo
02-02-2014, 01:49 PM
Robinson should of been red carded in first half for a shocking challenge on the touchline.

matty_f
02-02-2014, 01:51 PM
How fat is Hamill?!

Monts
02-02-2014, 01:53 PM
3 of their 4 games in this competition have been against 10 men too

Monts
02-02-2014, 02:02 PM
Another ridiculous red

Ronniekirk
02-02-2014, 02:04 PM
3 of their 4 games in this competition have been against 10 men too

Looks like the football gods have decided to reward cheats .

GreenLake
02-02-2014, 02:07 PM
Perhaps it will be more gutting for them to get pasted in the final and have relegation to look forward to afterwards.

God Petrie
02-02-2014, 02:11 PM
Well they certainly couldn't "finish this game" against 9 men!

Saorsa
02-02-2014, 02:11 PM
wonder if the ref has a bet on a yam win or number of red cards, ****in' brutal performance

One Day Soon
02-02-2014, 02:15 PM
Late to this, just put the tv on. Has it been even over 90 mins or what?

cocopops1875
02-02-2014, 02:17 PM
Another ridiculous red

Really ?

Hibercelona
02-02-2014, 02:20 PM
Really ?

A red card for 2 bookings that just never were and 1 straight red for a challenge that was a yellow at the very worst.

The worst tackle in the game so far has came from a Hearts player!

Monts
02-02-2014, 02:21 PM
Really ?

Yes.

Was cynical, but it wasn't wreck less, two footed, dangerous, or denying a goal scoring opportunity.

Yellow card.

cocopops1875
02-02-2014, 02:25 PM
Yes.

Was cynical, but it wasn't wreck less, two footed, dangerous, or denying a goal scoring opportunity.

Yellow card.

Straight red for the second one all day long he basically kicked out, it certainly wasn't a tackle

cocopops1875
02-02-2014, 02:28 PM
A red card for 2 bookings that just never were and 1 straight red for a challenge that was a yellow at the very worst.

The worst tackle in the game so far has came from a Hearts player!

Agree on the second point mate but think the ICT boy had to go

Monts
02-02-2014, 02:28 PM
Straight red for the second one all day long he basically kicked out, it certainly wasn't a tackle

Nah not for me, he stuck his leg out to stop him going past

LaMotta
02-02-2014, 02:32 PM
Straight red for the second one all day long he basically kicked out, it certainly wasn't a tackle

No chance should that have been a red! Shocking decision

Hibercelona
02-02-2014, 02:35 PM
Agree on the second point mate but think the ICT boy had to go

No danger!

He put his foot in front of the Hearts player and tripped him over. There was nothing dangerous about it and it was in ICTs own half!

Sir David Gray
02-02-2014, 02:40 PM
The red card for Meekings was ridiculous. Certainly a foul and no arguments if it had been a yellow card but no way was it a sending off.

Hibercelona
02-02-2014, 02:43 PM
Neither of the yellow cards were yellows. In fact, the freekick that was awarded for the second yellow, wasn't even a freekick. No foul had even occured!

cocopops1875
02-02-2014, 03:21 PM
No danger!

He put his foot in front of the Hearts player and tripped him over. There was nothing dangerous about it and it was in ICTs own half!

No danger ? Did the ICT boy looked shocked ? I certainly called it as red before the card was flashed, just my opinion but obviously that of the ref too, guess we will see if it's overturned

BarneyK
02-02-2014, 03:25 PM
No danger ? Did the ICT boy looked shocked ? I certainly called it as red before the card was flashed, just my opinion but obviously that of the ref too, guess we will see if it's overturned

If we start sending folk off for that there'll be a few abandonments. Not a chance that was red.

BarneyK
02-02-2014, 03:27 PM
No danger ? Did the ICT boy looked shocked ? I certainly called it as red before the card was flashed, just my opinion but obviously that of the ref too, guess we will see if it's overturned

The boy looked apoplectic heading down the tunnel. He was waiting for his yellow card and was given a red.

Hibercelona
02-02-2014, 03:36 PM
No danger ? Did the ICT boy looked shocked ? I certainly called it as red before the card was flashed, just my opinion but obviously that of the ref too, guess we will see if it's overturned

Yes he did.

Since when was tripping a player up deemed a red card?

What did you see in that challenge that merits a red card based on the laws of the game?

Waxy
02-02-2014, 03:40 PM
The cheating establishment getting to the refs.

erin go bragh
02-02-2014, 06:31 PM
No danger ? Did the ICT boy looked shocked ? I certainly called it as red before the card was flashed, just my opinion but obviously that of the ref too, guess we will see if it's overturned
Looked Shocked ! He looked bewildered , never a straight red . A yellow yes but cmon , straight red ! Never !! Justice was done in the end tho .

Ggtth

greenlex
02-02-2014, 06:42 PM
Straight red for the second one all day long he basically kicked out, it certainly wasn't a tackleYellow for me. He didn't really kick out he blocked his run with his leg. IIRC it was almost the back of his leg that stopped him going forward. It wasn't dangerous or serious foul play so Yellow for me.

Monts
03-02-2014, 08:12 AM
Yellow for me. He didn't really kick out he blocked his run with his leg. IIRC it was almost the back of his leg that stopped him going forward. It wasn't dangerous or serious foul play so Yellow for me.

:agree:

Ronniekirk
03-02-2014, 08:21 AM
Yes he did.

Since when was tripping a player up deemed a red card?

What did you see in that challenge that merits a red card based on the laws of the game?

It was cynical foul that from ref s position maybe looked like he had just hacked him down, the player had built up a bit of momentum which was also a factor but agree it was not a red.The ref was too fussy yesterday but he certaily made sure he gave hearts an advantage .but they still managed to **** it up

Monts
03-02-2014, 01:15 PM
Back on track...

Does anyone have the stats for how many players have been sent off against hearts this season and how it compares to the average?