PDA

View Full Version : Defence needed



mcfly
25-07-2013, 09:42 PM
The 1st 3 goals we lost were terrible, nil up front causing any threat and v little positive about that performance.

If pat Fenlon cannot see our defence is awful then he is the wrong man for the job

southern hibby
25-07-2013, 09:51 PM
was in malmo and I thought that Hanlon as left back was excellent again tonight he was the only one who looked solid until McPake went off and he went back into central defence. Maybe if we keep him at left back we would have 1 out of 4 positions covered. GGTTH.

Zemamma10
25-07-2013, 09:53 PM
Hanlon left back with McGivern in the centre is definitely the way I'd go to start the season.

One Day
25-07-2013, 09:57 PM
The 1st 3 goals we lost were terrible, nil up front causing any threat and v little positive about that performance.

If pat Fenlon cannot see our defence is awful then he is the wrong man for the job



Just the 1st and 3rd??

hibbydog
25-07-2013, 09:58 PM
Their front 3 ripped us to bits every time they came forward .

The number 29 was just awesome.

I think our whole team was guff, especially the defence, but we ain't going to be facing that sort of class every week.

dangermouse
25-07-2013, 10:45 PM
He has a point. That Malmo team would have ripped Celtic a new erchie

Weir7
25-07-2013, 10:50 PM
Hanlon left back with McGivern in the centre is definitely the way I'd go to start the season.
They two were brutal in cup final gifted celtic two goals. Mc/ivern isn't a good defender. He is poor at stopping crosses.
Hanlon has no pace. Ball over top and he's out they game. He can't sense danger.

coco22
25-07-2013, 11:03 PM
Mcpake was slow and a liability, Stevenson very flat as a full back - happy for both not to feature frequently this year. Must get a strong CH or could be seriously fooled this season

Boyle89
25-07-2013, 11:05 PM
Defence was gash no doubt about it but the midfield didnt track the runners and that cost us.