View Full Version : BBC Inaccuracies
jonty
17-01-2013, 10:01 AM
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-21049125
Journalism has been getting worse over the years, just through sheer laziness.
yet another case in point - The MI6 building is referred to as the M16 building in the graphic. Doesn no-one at the BBC have an ounce of common sense or awareness? Does no-one check content or understand the context?
Its the kind of crap i'd expect from a red-top but the BBC? (yes, the irony, the top of the bbc website is red :greengrin)
Rant over.
Beefster
17-01-2013, 11:13 AM
Is it really that big a deal? Given the monumental output that the BBC produces, I'd expect a few typing errors here and there.
Scouse Hibee
17-01-2013, 11:30 AM
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-21049125
Journalism has been getting worse over the years, just through sheer laziness.
yet another case in point - The MI6 building is referred to as the M16 building in the graphic. Doesn no-one at the BBC have an ounce of common sense or awareness? Does no-one check content or understand the context?
Its the kind of crap i'd expect from a red-top but the BBC? (yes, the irony, the top of the bbc website is red :greengrin)
Rant over.
Read your own post and realise everyone can make mistakes :greengrin
jonty
17-01-2013, 11:50 AM
Is it really that big a deal? Given the monumental output that the BBC produces, I'd expect a few typing errors here and there.
Yes. They're the largest, most popular, heaviest used website in the UK (if not further afield). Given that most will be spell checked, there shouldnt be any spelling errors.
Its lazyness. The spell checker does its work, makes them into proper 'words' yet the grammer and context is nonsense.
yes, i expect better given how many millions get spent on the BBC every year.
Next we'll be getting told its Buckingham Place, or Edinburghs Princeses Street.
No one appears to take pride in their work any more.
Read your own post and realise everyone can make mistakes :greengrin
Sadly my posts arent edited, re-edited and funded by licence-fee payers.
I also should not be seen as a news reported, or the font of all knowledge. sadly. :greengrin
Even i have my limitations. speeling and gramma being one of them. :wink:
I know i'm just ***** :greengrin
lapsedhibee
17-01-2013, 01:27 PM
Its lazyness.
:hmmm:
jonty
17-01-2013, 01:32 PM
:hmmm:
Self improvement! :greengrin
clearly i set my standards too high.
i learneded all my stuff on hibs.net and was hoping that reading the BBC would improve me.
After watching James Bond even I know its MI6 and not the M16 - it runs/ran through Potters Bar.
jonty
18-01-2013, 08:50 AM
And its getting worse
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-21070945
:greengrin
lapsedhibee
18-01-2013, 09:26 AM
And its getting worse
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-21070945
:greengrin
At first I thought the "worser" was going to be the start of some sort of spoof coverage, but no.
That appears to be a real error and is, genuinely, shocking. :bitchy:
jonty
18-01-2013, 12:16 PM
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/scotland/21067118
*sigh*
Possibly oungest Hearts team ever - John McGlynn
Not even spell checked.
Is it not possible to get correct grammer, speeling and punctuation from a news source? No wonder the kids nowadays are what they are.
(OMG I've turned into my grandad:greengrin)
RyeSloan
19-01-2013, 06:13 PM
At first I thought the "worser" was going to be the start of some sort of spoof coverage, but no.
That appears to be a real error and is, genuinely, shocking. :bitchy:
I must be missing your irony as it was clearly a deliberate 'mistake'
lapsedhibee
19-01-2013, 07:34 PM
I must be missing your irony as it was clearly a deliberate 'mistake'
I hope you are right, but there's nothing in the whole of the rest of that clip to suggest that it was. The whole report seemed to me to be completely straight.
Sir David Gray
19-01-2013, 11:19 PM
I hope you are right, but there's nothing in the whole of the rest of that clip to suggest that it was. The whole report seemed to me to be completely straight.
Definitely a deliberate mistake.
lapsedhibee
20-01-2013, 04:48 AM
Definitely a deliberate mistake.
Yeah, agree on reflection. I guess I must of been spending to much time on the interweb, where so much grammar and spelling is optional. Are optional. Where so many grammar and spelling are optional. So many grammars and spellings are optional. **, **** **
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.