Sergio sledge
21-05-2011, 08:39 PM
Saw THIS (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-13481408) article on the web the other day and it seems that the whispering campaign against Lance Armstrong is growing ever bigger. The question is, did he dope or didn't he?
Personally I think that whilst the people coming out with these stories just now are only doing it for publicity, the fact that Armstrong dominated the sport at a time where nearly everyone else was doping after coming back from cancer treatments makes me mighty suspicious.
I was also reading some of the other articles on the BBC such as THIS (http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/timfranks/2011/05/on_the_trail_of_the_dopers_cyc.html) and it seems that doping seems to be pretty widespread even at the lower levels. It seems the testers are not really winning the battle against doping. Should they continue to fight it, or accept that it happens and make it legal? That way everyone will know that everyone is doping and can concentrate on the racing again.
Thoughts?
Personally I think that whilst the people coming out with these stories just now are only doing it for publicity, the fact that Armstrong dominated the sport at a time where nearly everyone else was doping after coming back from cancer treatments makes me mighty suspicious.
I was also reading some of the other articles on the BBC such as THIS (http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/timfranks/2011/05/on_the_trail_of_the_dopers_cyc.html) and it seems that doping seems to be pretty widespread even at the lower levels. It seems the testers are not really winning the battle against doping. Should they continue to fight it, or accept that it happens and make it legal? That way everyone will know that everyone is doping and can concentrate on the racing again.
Thoughts?