Fancy any of these strikers?

[Hibbyradge]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dV8ozxliySQ&feature=player_detailpage

[RickyS]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dV8ozxliySQ&feature=player_detailpage

3 of those attempts were on target, surely an improvement on what we have:greengrin

[Hibbyradge]

3 of those attempts were on target, surely an improvement on what we have:greengrin

:greengrin

However, are the post and bar considered "on target"?

[Speedy]

:greengrin

However, are the post and bar considered "on target"?

I wouldn't have said so.

[essexhibee]

Utterly Hilarious.

Who were the teams. The header was particurly funny, the ball wasnt even rolling fast for the last guy how did he blast over!! :faf::faf:

[RickyS]

:greengrin

However, are the post and bar considered "on target"?

Fair Point, I don't know the answer to that?

[HibbyAndy]

:hilarious

:greengrin

[CapitalHibs]

At least they were wearing the :jamboak: jerseys:wink:


Bloody useless defending by the green team though:rolleyes:

[Hibernian Verse]

It is considered on target :agree:

[GordonHFC]

Hitting the post/bar does not constitute 'hitting the Target'. Only if the shot/header etc was directly going in constitutes it being on target.

[HibbyAndy]

Hitting the post/bar does not constitute 'hitting the Target'. Only if the shot/header etc was directly going in constitutes it being on target.

That would be my take on it :agree:

[HibeeMG]

Nah, I think we should go for this guy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQLylizGmDs&feature=youtube_gdata_player

[Hibbyradge]

It is considered on target :agree:


Hitting the post/bar does not constitute 'hitting the Target'. Only if the shot/header etc was directly going in constitutes it being on target.


That would be my take on it :agree:

Someone start a poll. :agree:

The target is to get the ball over the line.

Hitting the woodwork doesn't do that, so, imo, it's off target.

Having said that, hitting the ball at the goalie in the middle of the goal doesn't get the ball over the line either, but that's considered on target.

:hmmm:

[Hibbyradge]

Nah, I think we should go for this guy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQLylizGmDs&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Beaut! :thumbsup:

As someone else on this thread might point out, at least he was on target!

:hilarious:

[RickyS]

Beaut! :thumbsup:

As someone else on this thread might point out, at least he was on target!

:hilarious:

this one is better

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0sgH3OGO0M&NR=1

[Hibbyradge]

this one is better

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0sgH3OGO0M&NR=1

Dearie me.

I'm sure the Russian? commentator says something like, "Oh Jeez" when he sees the replay! :hilarious:

[blairwallace]

i'll take all three

[Leishy1995]

Lets compare him to the three recent chances to that, de graafs, heskeys and nile rangers... One we have one we "want" and one who played 65 times for his country. Are these guys better?