PDA

View Full Version : Ratings?



R'Albin
20-11-2010, 10:37 PM
Brown 7- our best player IMO should have done better for first but some good saves:agree:

Hart 6- didnt do much but gave away a few silly fouls.

Bamba 5- actually played nb at RB but got caught napping a few times, his marking was shocking at CB!

Dickoh 5- see bold for bamba.

grounds 5- few good runs but got caught out a few times.

Rankin 5- forgot he was playing

De graaf 5- so innefective as was the rest of our midfield!:grr:

Miller 6- brilliant pen, played alright but such a pussy for challenges!:grr:

Murray 6- did his job well enough.

Nishy 4- not normally a nish basher but he was appalling!!

Deeko 6- hardly did anything but score good finish.

subs-galbraith 6-poor on the right but did well on the left

Hanlon 4- did do anything but handball on the line, just a natural instinct dont blame him but didnt do anything to get a decent mark so its a 4.

Spooney -no time either.

a combinitation of lack of creativity and shocking defending cost us that game, simples:bye: but cmon hibs we can recover from this st j and st midden at home! mon ih cabbage:notworthy:

Albion Hibs
20-11-2010, 10:47 PM
Brown 6- Excellent save before half time.

Hart 3- Was at fault for first goal and they seem to have targeted him as weak link. Had to come off.

Bamba 5- Passing is terrible.

Dickoh 6- Played well.

Grounds 5- Decent movement forward, suspect defending at times and passing needs to be a bit better than it was today

Rankin 5- Drifted out of the game after starting well

De graaf 3- Poor, CC did the right thing taking him off

Miller 6- Good pen, played well, dont agree with comments about his challenging

Murray 6- Played well.

Nishy 4- Hard game to come back into. Hopefully playing alongside Trakys next week will see him give a little more

Riordan 5 - Scored, but overall contribution was poor.

Galbraith did well when he came on, he has the pace and ability very frustrating that it takes a sub performance when we are down in a game for it to come out.

Hanlon, perhaps unlucky but that effectively killed the game for us.

Sammy7nil
20-11-2010, 10:50 PM
Nishy 4- Hard game to come back into. Hopefully playing alongside Trakys next week will see him give a little more

Was about to laugh my head off Nish to start !!! Until I remembered Deeks is banned :boo hoo:

blackpoolhibs
20-11-2010, 10:51 PM
Was De Graff injured or was it just back to normal for the Dutch destroyer?

marinello59
20-11-2010, 10:55 PM
Was De Graff injured or was it just back to normal for the Dutch destroyer?

That depends on your opinion of him.:wink:
Looked like a tactical decision to me. He was poor.

blackpoolhibs
20-11-2010, 10:58 PM
That depends on your opinion of him.:wink:
Looked like a tactical decision to me. He was poor.

I think he's useless, although was better last week. :wink:

marinello59
20-11-2010, 10:59 PM
I think he's useless, although was better last week. :wink:

Shockeroonie. :greengrin

blackpoolhibs
20-11-2010, 11:03 PM
Shockeroonie. :greengrin

He's not the only one, i can name a few others too.:boo hoo:

Dunbar Hibee
21-11-2010, 03:26 AM
Didn't think De Graaf was one of our worst players in the first half...

IWasThere2016
21-11-2010, 07:08 AM
Broon - good
Back 4 - bad
The Rest - ugly

Andy74
21-11-2010, 08:10 AM
Was De Graff injured or was it just back to normal for the Dutch destroyer?

The match thread had him playing well first half. I think he was one who hadn't trained this week after his injuries last week.

matty_f
21-11-2010, 08:22 AM
Was De Graff injured or was it just back to normal for the Dutch destroyer?

I believe he hadn't trained much, if at all, through the week following his injury against well.