bingo70
18-10-2010, 10:53 AM
Just mentioned this on the new manager mega thread but thought i'd give it a thread on it's own to get peoples thoughts...
I've heard Petrie being criticised for going for the cheap option, however, considering we're losing a rake money every year excluding player sales i'd have thought thats all we could afford?
I realise that if we pay big money for a good manager then it could end up paying for itself but is that not a gamble similar to what Dundee did and are now being slated for?
So what would people rather do, get a manager we can actually afford or gamble and spend outwith our means?
I've heard Petrie being criticised for going for the cheap option, however, considering we're losing a rake money every year excluding player sales i'd have thought thats all we could afford?
I realise that if we pay big money for a good manager then it could end up paying for itself but is that not a gamble similar to what Dundee did and are now being slated for?
So what would people rather do, get a manager we can actually afford or gamble and spend outwith our means?