View Full Version : 6 attempts on goal
Only 2 on target. 1 goal.
Just not good enough Hibs.
Wotherspiniesta
06-03-2010, 05:28 PM
Hibernian 1-0 Kilmarnock
That would suggest it was good enough. :wink:
Kevvy1875
06-03-2010, 05:30 PM
Hibernian 1-0 Kilmarnock
That would suggest it was good enough. :wink:
You know what....
I agree:greengrin
Brooster
06-03-2010, 05:32 PM
Only 2 on target. 1 goal.
Just not good enough Hibs.
Whats your problem mate?
Only 2 on target. 1 goal.
Just not good enough Hibs.
I can think of 6 on target straight away.
Part/Time Supporter
06-03-2010, 05:32 PM
Some dodgy counting going on there IMO. I can think of six shots on target off the top of my head.
Riordan forced a good (flying) save to the keeper's left in the first half
Stokes had a low shot tipped round the post in the first half. The twat of a referee gave a goal kick - such a poor decision that even Calderwood was laughing about it.
The penalty
Benji had a low shot held by the keeper to his left
The goal
Stokes had another low shot tipped round the post in the second half.
That's not to say it wasn't a poor game. But to say that Hibs had only two shots on goal today isn't true.
Kevvy1875
06-03-2010, 05:34 PM
I think the OP has taken the stats from the BBC site?
Not accurate IMO.
eg. Killie had no shots on target? Thats BS for a start, I remember Stack saving a header from a corner late on.
TheMentalHibees
06-03-2010, 05:34 PM
1 goal. 3 points. Good enough for me.
RoYO!
06-03-2010, 05:38 PM
there was more than 2 on target.
riordan 1st half from outside area
stokes- where keeper ended up over the line-just keeping the ball out
benji header
another where the keeper made a diving save and held(2n, dk who it was
a left foot tame effort (danny)
the pen
and the goal :wink:
not that thats enough, seem to be having real problems creating chances/ getting the ball into good areas, though at the end we were getting a bit more into it
biggie1875
06-03-2010, 06:14 PM
:top marks1-0 or 10-0 still 3 points for the hibees
1 goal. 3 points. Good enough for me.
Part/Time Supporter
06-03-2010, 06:16 PM
Here's how reliable those BBC stats are.
Newcastle 6-1 Barnsley
Newcastle had 5 shots on target, apparently.
:wtf:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/eng_div_1/8548070.stm
Also interesting to note that the referee sent off the Barnsley goalkeeper for a "last man" trip on a forward.
:rolleyes:
Alfred E Newman
06-03-2010, 06:18 PM
Killie no shots on target?
joe_hfc
06-03-2010, 06:22 PM
1 goal. 3 points. Good enough for me.
But most games, having only 2 shots on target won't bring us 3 points. We need to improve. It was Killie we were playing, they are man-for-man pisher than us remember!
Cool_Hand_Luke
06-03-2010, 06:38 PM
But most games, having only 2 shots on target won't bring us 3 points. We need to improve. It was Killie we were playing, they are man-for-man pisher than us remember!
But there was more than 2 shots on target today :agree:
blackpoolhibs
06-03-2010, 06:54 PM
Stack never had a save to make in the whole game. I'd love 6 shots at some people.
biggie1875
06-03-2010, 08:05 PM
lets worry about the other games when they happen , this game hibs 1 goal for 0 against thats all that matters we got the 3 points :wink:
But most games, having only 2 shots on target won't bring us 3 points. We need to improve. It was Killie we were playing, they are man-for-man pisher than us remember!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.