Simkin911
16-01-2010, 09:41 AM
Shifting through a collection of good, bad & ugly papers on a relaxin Saturday AM and was interested to read an interview with Rankin in The Sun (surely true then?).
Rankin was talking about the players doing their 6k run. Stack managed 15.57 whilst Rankin blew this away with a time of 13.37. :confused:
Doesn't sound right... in fact, sounds incredible.
Gebrselassie, aiming to break the 10k world record in May last year "blasted" through the first five kilometres in 13min 31sec but finished in 27.39 (and his 6k time was still over 16mins).
I'm sure Rankin's time was on the treadmill (which would help in an huge manner and make a massive difference) plus he's obviously reached a high level of fitness BUT still sounds simply too quick....
Well done if accurate though.... :agree:. If non-treadmill times then he's obviously in the wrong job.
Rankin was talking about the players doing their 6k run. Stack managed 15.57 whilst Rankin blew this away with a time of 13.37. :confused:
Doesn't sound right... in fact, sounds incredible.
Gebrselassie, aiming to break the 10k world record in May last year "blasted" through the first five kilometres in 13min 31sec but finished in 27.39 (and his 6k time was still over 16mins).
I'm sure Rankin's time was on the treadmill (which would help in an huge manner and make a massive difference) plus he's obviously reached a high level of fitness BUT still sounds simply too quick....
Well done if accurate though.... :agree:. If non-treadmill times then he's obviously in the wrong job.