PDA

View Full Version : NHC Liverpool beachball scores for Sunderland (merged)



heretoday
18-10-2009, 01:41 AM
I was going to ....mmmm purrrr....say that the Sunderland goal went in off a balloon today.

I wasn't aware that Barry Ferguson had signed for Liverpool.

Hibercelona
18-10-2009, 01:57 AM
Loving the puns over on SSN. :agree:

Liverpool are ballooning out of control. :cool2:

YehButNoBut
18-10-2009, 07:44 AM
Just seen the goal on MOTD, Bent's shot was heading straight for the keeper when it hit a big red balloon (not Nade) and deflected past him.

The balloon seemingly had a Liverpool badge on it, nay luck Liverpool. :faf:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKg9zUgu0Lc

RoYO!
18-10-2009, 08:39 AM
aye it was a liverpool fan that threw it on, must be getting some stick now:greengrin

OstKurve Hibs
18-10-2009, 08:41 AM
Just seen the goal on MOTD, Bent's shot was heading straight for the keeper when it hit a big red balloon (not Nade) and deflected past him.

The balloon seemingly had a Liverpool badge on it, nay luck Liverpool. :faf:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKg9zUgu0Lc


Aye they showed the liverpool fan punching it on to the pitch, even blanked his face out prob to save him gettin a beatin.

HibbyAndy
18-10-2009, 08:45 AM
Any chance Liverpool had of winning the league burst yesterday.

Arch Stanton
18-10-2009, 08:52 AM
Just seen the goal on MOTD, Bent's shot was heading straight for the keeper when it hit a big red balloon (not Nade) and deflected past him.

The balloon seemingly had a Liverpool badge on it, nay luck Liverpool. :faf:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKg9zUgu0Lc

No - the way I saw it Bent played for the cannon off the red.:greengrin

Golden Bear
18-10-2009, 09:17 AM
The "goal" should have been disallowed if the laws of the game had been applied corrrectly.

Apparently as the football was deflected by an "outside influence" then the goal should not have stood.

The match officials will be the red faced balloons this morning!

ArabHibee
18-10-2009, 10:24 AM
Wasn't it a beach ball?

I'm sure I saw same beach ball in the back of the Liverpool net prior to the actual goal? It made me think that the Liverpool goalie had put it there to keep it out of the way and maybe it had come out due to it being windy? Maybe he should have burst it instead of putting it in the back of his goal?

Winston Ingram
18-10-2009, 10:31 AM
http://img204.imagevenue.com/loc47/th_61379_Darren-Bent-Sunderland-Liverpool-Balloon-Prem_2373735_122_47lo.jpg

...better than Nade as well:greengrin
















:tumble: I'll get my coat

Part/Time Supporter
18-10-2009, 10:41 AM
...better than Nade as well:greengrin


I was going to say that they've already got a big balloon up front, but you've already covered that base.

:cool2:

RoYO!
18-10-2009, 10:41 AM
love how reinas instinct was to go for the beachball :greengrin

Part/Time Supporter
18-10-2009, 10:41 AM
http://img204.imagevenue.com/loc47/th_61379_Darren-Bent-Sunderland-Liverpool-Balloon-Prem_2373735_122_47lo.jpg



Available for only £10, surely within their price range?

http://store.liverpoolfc.tv/products/souvenirs/giftsandmisc/beach-set/pid-28099

RoYO!
18-10-2009, 10:45 AM
Available for only £10, surely within their price range?

http://store.liverpoolfc.tv/products/souvenirs/giftsandmisc/beach-set/pid-28099

read on yahoo that there sold out now! bought up by opposing fans :greengrin

bighairyfaeleith
18-10-2009, 10:48 AM
love the reviews on the LFC store of the beachball, they will be removed soon I reckon

Cool_Hand_Luke
18-10-2009, 11:10 AM
Just watching the goals from yesterday, and they are questioning whether the Sunderland goal should have been given.
If you've not seen it - here it is (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnWeboQTfeo) - someone throws a beachball onto the pitch, the shot comes in, hits of the ball and ends up in the net...looks like it does take a deflection and confuses Reina.

Should it have been given :dunno:

:greengrin

Edit: oops...never saw there was a thread already on this (it had hearts in its title so i never bothered reading it :greengrin - Admins, feel free to merge or delete)

Golden Bear
18-10-2009, 11:17 AM
Just watching the goals from yesterday, and they are questioning whether the Sunderland goal should have been given.
If you've not seen it - here it is (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnWeboQTfeo) - someone throws a beachball onto the pitch, the shot comes in, hits of the ball and ends up in the net...looks like it does take a deflection and confuses Reina.

Should it have been given :dunno:

:greengrin

Edit: oops...never saw there was a thread already on this (it had hearts in its title so i never bothered reading it :greengrin - Admins, feel free to merge or delete)

It should not have been given. The real ball was deflected of the beachball (an outside influence) so the goal should have been disallowed.

snooky
18-10-2009, 11:25 AM
It should not have been given. The real ball was deflected of the beachball (an outside influence) so the goal should have been disallowed.

Being a fan of the Makems, I think that was a great goal and the player had great presence of mind to play a canon off the beach ball.
Had it been for Liverpool - defo should've been disallowed. :wink:

Wotherspiniesta
18-10-2009, 11:51 AM
Rafa must have went BALLisitic. :greengrin

Seen the highlights and Liverpool could have taken a hammering! They should be thankful they kept it down to one. :agree:

Sas_The_Hibby
18-10-2009, 01:14 PM
http://img204.imagevenue.com/loc47/th_61379_Darren-Bent-Sunderland-Liverpool-Balloon-Prem_2373735_122_47lo.jpg

...better than Nade as well:greengrin



The beachball certainly has a better recent scoring record...........

Hibby D
18-10-2009, 01:18 PM
The "goal" should have been disallowed if the laws of the game had been applied corrrectly.

Apparently as the football was deflected by an "outside influence" then the goal should not have stood.

The match officials will be the red faced balloons this morning!


It should not have been given. The real ball was deflected of the beachball (an outside influence) so the goal should have been disallowed.



Out of interest - does the "outside influence" also cover the ref? Not that I've known this to happen but what if a deflection off the ref ultimately led to a goal - would it be disallowed? :dunno:

Sas_The_Hibby
18-10-2009, 01:21 PM
Out of interest - does the "outside influence" also cover the ref? Not that I've known this to happen but what if a deflection off the ref ultimately led to a goal - would it be disallowed? :dunno:

I've seen plenty of times the ref's accidentally (?) played the ball and play just continues, so I presume the ref doesn't count as an "outside influence".

If the ref was an "outside influence", you could say the same for posts, crossbars and grass! :greengrin

Speedy
18-10-2009, 01:45 PM
Aye they showed the liverpool fan punching it on to the pitch, even blanked his face out prob to save him gettin a beatin.

They never on sky sports at about 7ish. They showed him punch the ball on then showed his face at half time :greengrin

He'll be getting plenty stick at school tomorrow I think

Calvin
18-10-2009, 01:53 PM
The ref is counted as part of play so technically he could kick the ball into the net and it is a legitimate goal.

A few years ago I'm sure this happened in a game, maybe Sheffield United v Man City? The ball went in off balloons and no-one claimed it should have been disallowed then.

Sas_The_Hibby
18-10-2009, 01:53 PM
They never on sky sports at about 7ish. They should him punch the ball on then showed his face at half time :greengrin

He'll be getting plenty stick at school tomorrow I think

You'd be getting plenty stick at school, too if you were a bit younger..... from your English teacher!! :wink::greengrin

Sas_The_Hibby
18-10-2009, 01:55 PM
The ref is counted as part of play so technically he could kick the ball into the net and it is a legitimate goal.

A few years ago I'm sure this happened in a game, maybe Sheffield United v Man City? The ball went in off balloons and no-one claimed it should have been disallowed then.


Yeah, but Jimmy Balloons never refereed a league match again........ :greengrin

Hibercelona
18-10-2009, 01:56 PM
Look at this thread.... you're all full of hot air. :wink:

YehButNoBut
18-10-2009, 02:05 PM
The ref is counted as part of play so technically he could kick the ball into the net and it is a legitimate goal.

A few years ago I'm sure this happened in a game, maybe Sheffield United v Man City? The ball went in off balloons and no-one claimed it should have been disallowed then.

It was a Sheff Utd v Man City game but the ball did not go in off a balloon but they certainly did cause confusion.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLyHSI3bYd0

Calvin
18-10-2009, 02:06 PM
It was a Sheff Utd v Man City game but the ball did not go in off a balloon but they certainly did cause confusion.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLyHSI3bYd0

Well if the ball hits a balloon surely that is still an outside interference with play?

Speedy
18-10-2009, 05:12 PM
You'd be getting plenty stick at school, too if you were a bit younger..... from your English teacher!! :wink::greengrin

:doh: Is that any better sir?

...and I think your grammar needs checked. Your comma is in the wrong place, must try harder :wink:

Sas_The_Hibby
18-10-2009, 08:51 PM
:doh: Is that any better sir?

...and I think your grammar needs checked. Your comma is in the wrong place, must try harder :wink:

Touché, mon brave! :greengrin

CropleyWasGod
18-10-2009, 09:18 PM
Out of interest - does the "outside influence" also cover the ref? Not that I've known this to happen but what if a deflection off the ref ultimately led to a goal - would it be disallowed? :dunno:

There's been plenty discussion on the radio about this today, Di. The ref is part of the game (as are the posts, grass etc. :wink:) so the goal would have to stand if it was "scored" by him.

However..... is the wind part of the game? :confused:

Jim Herriot
19-10-2009, 04:24 PM
There's been plenty discussion on the radio about this today, Di. The ref is part of the game (as are the posts, grass etc. :wink:) so the goal would have to stand if it was "scored" by him.

However..... is the wind part of the game? :confused:

Barrow 1 Plymouth Argyle 0 - 9/10/68
Massive unintentional deflection off the referee a few minutes from time leads to the only goal.
Result: goal stands, as it should.
http://barrowfc.com/hsn/14
Also documented in "Football's Strangest Matches" by Andrew Ward.


Wimpole 2000 2 Earls Colne Reserves 20
Ref deliberately scored the second for Wimpole 2000 with 'a sweet left-foot volley', when they were 18-1 down.
Result: charge of misconduct by bringing the game into disrepute, 7 weeks suspension, and ref's subsequent resignation. (The goal still stood.)
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/referee-suspended-for-scoring-663370.html

Dashing Bob S
19-10-2009, 06:11 PM
They certainly won't win the league this season, and it'll be a long time before they do again. As i've said, this club in decline will struggle to make the CL this year. Without Gerrard and Torres they are a mid-table outfit. Bleak times ahead for them.

macca70
19-10-2009, 11:29 PM
Fergie to be investigated by FA due to new TV evidence

http://i37.tinypic.com/2njg5tl.gif

iwasthere1972
19-10-2009, 11:36 PM
love how reinas instinct was to go for the beachball :greengrin

Would have been funny if he had actually caught it. Would have been a stick on for the Ballon d'Or. :agree: