PDA

View Full Version : 4-4-2


Mikey
26-09-2009, 06:01 PM
What a difference. That was by far the best team performance of the season.

I can't believe how much running Riordan did up and down that left wing. He'll sleep well tonight :greengrin
WindyMiller
26-09-2009, 06:08 PM
I thought it was 4-2-4!
Titch
26-09-2009, 06:09 PM
wasn't at the game today but pat nevin said the formation was 4-2-4:confused:
Baw187
26-09-2009, 06:14 PM
wasn't at the game today but pat nevin said the formation was 4-2-4:confused:

I heard him say that but it's baws. It was a 4-4-2 that turned in to a 4 pronged attack when we were attacking.
Barney McGrew
26-09-2009, 06:15 PM
wasn't at the game today but pat nevin said the formation was 4-2-4:confused:

It probably seemed like that for long periods in the second half because Deeks and Zemmama were pushing so high up the pitch.

Whatever it was, it was really good :greengrin
Mikey
26-09-2009, 06:17 PM
I'd say it was 4-4-2 with Zemmama and Riordan pushing up as much as possible. Both came back when needed though.
chorley_fm
26-09-2009, 06:19 PM
4-4-2 is the way the game should be played.

Glad to see we played it today
erskine-hibby
26-09-2009, 06:19 PM
What a difference. That was by far the best team performance of the season.

I can't believe how much running Riordan did up and down that left wing. He'll sleep well tonight :greengrin

By that I take it you mean walking about and looking disinterested:greengrin
Alfred E Newman
26-09-2009, 06:30 PM
By that I take it you mean walking about and looking disinterested:greengrin

I take it that is a tongue in cheek comment. Anyone who doubted Riordans commitment should have been there today.As he did on Tuesday, Riordan put in a tremendous shift and scored a trademark goal. Can`t ask for better than that.
erskine-hibby
26-09-2009, 06:31 PM
I take it that is a tongue in cheek comment. Anyone who doubted Riordans commitment should have been there today.As he did on Tuesday, Riordan put in a tremendous shift and scored a trademark goal. Can`t ask for better than that.

Yes it was:greengrin
Mikey
26-09-2009, 06:34 PM
I take it that is a tongue in cheek comment. Anyone who doubted Riordans commitment should have been there today.As he did on Tuesday, Riordan put in a tremendous shift and scored a trademark goal. Can`t ask for better than that.

Spot on.
DaveF
26-09-2009, 07:26 PM
I take it that is a tongue in cheek comment. Anyone who doubted Riordans commitment should have been there today.As he did on Tuesday, Riordan put in a tremendous shift and scored a trademark goal. Can`t ask for better than that.

His goal was a brilliant finish to a great move. No panic, just a cool head at the right time :thumbsup: