dvz or dMc

[sauzee]

were we a bit quick to empty dvz,not the best full back we've seen and yes mccormack is still young and learning,but did dvz not give us a bit better ballance and a bit more experience

[PiemanP]

Would rather give an up and coming youngster a chance and game time rather than an older player who was going knowhere.

Either way i dont think Dm has been any worse than DVZ was!

[Luna_Asylum]

were we a bit quick to empty dvz,not the best full back we've seen and yes mccormack is still young and learning,but did dvz not give us a bit better ballance and a bit more experience

no we were slow in getting rid of DVZ.
mccormack sadly is just as bad

[Scooter]

Maybe cause daz is a centre half and not a right back. So unfair to judge. I don't think he played RB until mixu bashed him there

[Frogga]

DVZ wasn't great but he was much better then McCormack at RB.

I rate McCormack as a CB, however as a RB I would almost prefer Gattheussi.

[M8UDB]

Any1 is better than DVZ at RB. Would hav DMc in there before him any day of the week!!

[Hibs90]

In this order.

Gathuessi
McCann
McCormack
The Rest.

Bring back HKT! :agree:

[TornadoHibby]

mccormack sadly is just as bad

Unbelievable IMO! :confused: :grr:

[J-C]

Neither, I'd have McCann, a proven rb with good defensive qualities, we don't need every full back to charge down the wing, we need good defenders first.

[Andy74]

Neither, I'd have McCann, a proven rb with good defensive qualities, we don't need every full back to charge down the wing, we need good defenders first.

If we are playing this formation with no other width then we do need out full backs to be charging down the wing.

Until we get ones capable of it we should be playing 442.

[J-C]

If we are playing this formation with no other width then we do need out full backs to be charging down the wing.

Until we get ones capable of it we should be playing 442.

Agreed, I've been shouting for 4-4-2 since Mixu's days.