Gatecrasher
14-04-2009, 03:05 PM
if anyone is interested (http://forum.planet-f1.com/index.php?t=msg&th=74983&start=0&)
main point so far (http://www.planet-f1.com/story/0,18954,3213_5187619,00.html)
Brawn: appeal is "vindictive", and "for people too slow off the mark".
Tozzi: "only a person of supreme arrogance would think he is right when so many of his esteemed colleagues would disagree".
Renault's legal representative, Andrew Ford, noted the FIA and Whiting had early last season ruled illegal a design by the French manufacturer similar to that currently being used by Toyota.
Tozzi: "The position of the FIA is totally baffling...we urge you to save the FIA from itself
some photos (http://www.itv-f1.com/photo.aspx?IM_ID=53067&PG_ID=22)
The complexities of F1's technical loopholes seemed also to baffle the judges - one of whom, Malta's Guido de Marco, occasionally nodded off.
Brawn made reference to a number of cars - including Ferraris - from recent years which could be construed as contrary to the regulations.
Parr (Williams): "I find it almost pleasurable to hear Ferrari say they have won 11 world championships (drivers' and constructors') with an illegal car."
Brawn criticised Byrne and Newey: the appellants' case was "a vindictive response... that amounted to a fishing expedition".
Brawn rebutted Newey claim about speed: "The safety implication relating to a technical feature of the car is a bit below the belt."
this next part is very interesting to me
Renault's legal representative, Andrew Ford, noted the FIA and Whiting had early last season ruled illegal a design by the French manufacturer similar to that currently being used by Toyota.
Tozzi: "The position of the FIA is totally baffling...we urge you to save the FIA from itself."
main point so far (http://www.planet-f1.com/story/0,18954,3213_5187619,00.html)
Brawn: appeal is "vindictive", and "for people too slow off the mark".
Tozzi: "only a person of supreme arrogance would think he is right when so many of his esteemed colleagues would disagree".
Renault's legal representative, Andrew Ford, noted the FIA and Whiting had early last season ruled illegal a design by the French manufacturer similar to that currently being used by Toyota.
Tozzi: "The position of the FIA is totally baffling...we urge you to save the FIA from itself
some photos (http://www.itv-f1.com/photo.aspx?IM_ID=53067&PG_ID=22)
The complexities of F1's technical loopholes seemed also to baffle the judges - one of whom, Malta's Guido de Marco, occasionally nodded off.
Brawn made reference to a number of cars - including Ferraris - from recent years which could be construed as contrary to the regulations.
Parr (Williams): "I find it almost pleasurable to hear Ferrari say they have won 11 world championships (drivers' and constructors') with an illegal car."
Brawn criticised Byrne and Newey: the appellants' case was "a vindictive response... that amounted to a fishing expedition".
Brawn rebutted Newey claim about speed: "The safety implication relating to a technical feature of the car is a bit below the belt."
this next part is very interesting to me
Renault's legal representative, Andrew Ford, noted the FIA and Whiting had early last season ruled illegal a design by the French manufacturer similar to that currently being used by Toyota.
Tozzi: "The position of the FIA is totally baffling...we urge you to save the FIA from itself."