hibs.net Messageboard

View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?

Voters
1004. You may not vote on this poll
  • Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football

    533 53.09%
  • Opposed - but will continue to support the game.

    447 44.52%
  • In favour.

    24 2.39%
Page 181 of 1480 FirstFirst ... 811311711791801811821831912312816811181 ... LastLast
Results 5,401 to 5,430 of 44390
  1. #5401
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    28,962
    Quote Originally Posted by CentreLine View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Under Articles 94.1 and 95, the Tribunal expelled Craig Whyte for life from any participation in Association Football in Scotland.

    So who is guilty if CW remains 85% owner of Rangers. urely ownership = participation?
    He will have to sell his shares....


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #5402
    Quote Originally Posted by CentreLine View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Under Articles 94.1 and 95, the Tribunal expelled Craig Whyte for life from any participation in Association Football in Scotland.

    So who is guilty if CW remains 85% owner of Rangers. urely ownership = participation?
    I'm sure I read somewhere that ownership ≠ participation.

    It's not like CW will be hanging about anyhow.

  4. #5403
    @hibs.net private member Frazerbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Persevered Towers
    Age
    51
    Posts
    10,910
    Will the signing ban cover "Rangers 1012" though? With Rangers FC going down the swanny an a matter of weeks, surely this 12 month ban is a nonsense.

  5. #5404
    @hibs.net private member Seveno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,701
    And still the investigation into dual contracts to be concluded by the SFA. What will the punishment be for that ?

  6. #5405
    Quote Originally Posted by AberGreen View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Will the signing ban cover "Rangers 1012" though? With Rangers FC going down the swanny an a matter of weeks, surely this 12 month ban is a nonsense.
    Well, that's just it though. But if any newco is seen to be circumnavigating footballing punishments as well as stiffing the taxpayer and countless creditors it's going to make even more of a stink.

    We're dreaming that these fines will be paid, or that hun will exist in its current form in 12 weeks, let alone 12 months, but I think these censures have made hun's overall situation worse. Which is to be applauded, obviously.

  7. #5406
    @hibs.net private member Seveno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,701
    Quote Originally Posted by AberGreen View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Will the signing ban cover "Rangers 1012" though? With Rangers FC going down the swanny an a matter of weeks, surely this 12 month ban is a nonsense.
    With UEFA breathing down their neck, I do not believe that the SFA will let Rangers or newco away with anything.

    Someone call the undertaker.

  8. #5407
    First Team Breakthrough HibbyRod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    71
    Posts
    358
    Quote Originally Posted by Seveno View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    And still the investigation into dual contracts to be concluded by the SFA. What will the punishment be for that ?
    I thought it was the SPL that were conducting the investigation, and would then report to the SFA?

    If so, does anyone know which stage it is at?

  9. #5408
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    5,050
    Quote Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    He will have to sell his shares....
    And if he doesn't?

    Or is the SFA still at it? Meaningless punishment placing a financial fine on a bankrupt club but having been seen to impose the maximum? Preparing the ground for Newco and forcing CW's hand getting him to sell? Without that sale things get very muddy for them, no?

  10. #5409
    johnbc70
    Left by mutual consent!
    Regards the fine for Craig Whyte then what powers do the SFA really have, I mean we all know he will not pay, but it's not like a parking fine or a court fine that if you do not pay you can go to prison. So really just a paper exercise as he will not pay and the SFA can do nothing to make him pay?

  11. #5410
    @hibs.net private member CallumLaidlaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Rosyth, Fife
    Age
    42
    Posts
    14,744
    Gamer IDs

    PSN ID: Cal_hibby
    BBC journo says that it doesn't stop white being a shareholder, just a chairman, etc.

    And any ban WILL transfer to a newco if SFA allow the license to be transferred to a newco

  12. #5411
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    5,050
    Quote Originally Posted by johnbc70 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Regards the fine for Craig Whyte then what powers do the SFA really have, I mean we all know he will not pay, but it's not like a parking fine or a court fine that if you do not pay you can go to prison. So really just a paper exercise as he will not pay and the SFA can do nothing to make him pay?
    Maybe the SFA could take the fine money from TV revenues etc for SC participaton?

  13. #5412
    @hibs.net private member bringbackbenny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    across the forth
    Age
    52
    Posts
    1,631
    The teddy bears on Rangers Media are taking it well ;-). Follow link at your own risk...

    http://forum.rangersmedia.co.uk/inde...ntry1059973898

  14. #5413
    The swallow swallow thread on this is comedy gold.

  15. #5414
    Coaching Staff LancashireHibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Leigh, Lancashire
    Age
    37
    Posts
    6,935
    "Speaking about the punishment, Whyte said: "Tell me how it is going to affect me? I couldn't care less. It makes no difference to my life whatsoever - and good luck collecting the money."

    Has someone hacked the BBC website or has he actually said that?!

  16. #5415
    @hibs.net private member Minder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    465
    Quote Originally Posted by CallumLaidlaw View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    BBC journo says that it doesn't stop white being a shareholder, just a chairman, etc.

    And any ban WILL transfer to a newco if SFA allow the license to be transferred to a newco
    On the the 23rd April 2012, the Scottish Football Association finally appear to have grown some balls. There is hope for our game yet.

  17. #5416
    @hibs.net private member Seveno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,701
    Quote Originally Posted by bringbackbenny View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The teddy bears on Rangers Media are taking it well ;-). Follow link at your own risk...

    http://forum.rangersmedia.co.uk/inde...ntry1059973898
    You have to applaud this poster for his remarkable insight :

    ' ****** them. No one likes us.'



  18. #5417
    Solipsist Eyrie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    PDSBRS
    Posts
    13,181
    I think the Huns will appeal against the 12 month signing ban simply because they're going to lose so many players come the summer. That's the bit which will hit them hard. They're not going to be bothered about yet another liability to not pay.

    And whether it's real or fake, the Whyte quote is very believable. He didn't even bother to put a case for a postponement to prepare a defence.

  19. #5418
    Testimonial Due Brando7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Costa Del Rosyth
    Age
    45
    Posts
    2,820
    Amazing news the BK & BM be pulling out tomorrow defo 12-month transfer embargo

  20. #5419
    Coaching Staff Westie1875's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Easter Road
    Age
    41
    Posts
    7,919
    Quote Originally Posted by LancashireHibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    "Speaking about the punishment, Whyte said: "Tell me how it is going to affect me? I couldn't care less. It makes no difference to my life whatsoever - and good luck collecting the money."

    Has someone hacked the BBC website or has he actually said that?!
    Oh I hope so, between him and Vlad I don't know who I admire the most

  21. #5420
    @hibs.net private member cabbageandribs1875's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    in a house in Bathgate
    Posts
    54,280
    just whipped this from a thread on swallow swallow


    Enough is Enough

    Liquidate the bloody club and leave the shi*ehole that is Scotland forever.
    How can such a corrupt body run a sport.
    Crooks and bigots in charge at SFA. Now it is totally clear.

    They can all fe*k off. If any fan of Rangers goes to another away game, they need their head tested.


    words fail me


    now they want to destroy the SFA, and everyone else
    Last edited by cabbageandribs1875; 23-04-2012 at 10:23 PM.

  22. #5421
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    28,962
    Quote Originally Posted by Eyrie View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think the Huns will appeal against the 12 month signing ban simply because they're going to lose so many players come the summer. That's the bit which will hit them hard. They're not going to be bothered about yet another liability to not pay.

    And whether it's real or fake, the Whyte quote is very believable. He didn't even bother to put a case for a postponement to prepare a defence.
    They are appealling....(cue the Carry On joke)

    http://www.rangers.co.uk/news/footba...rticle/2746199

  23. #5422
    Quote Originally Posted by magpie1892 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'm sure I read somewhere that ownership ≠ participation.

    It's not like CW will be hanging about anyhow.
    I would say that ownership = control and control must = participation. I wonder if the SFA can enforce their fine given that CW has been banished. It's surely not a legal sanction so I reckon Whyte could just tell them to do one.

    Assuming my first sentence is right this makes the administrators job a bit easier in the sense that they now have a solid argument that RFC's shares are worthless in CW's hands Rangers cannot exit administration as a football club as long as CW owns the club. On the other hand the signing embargo in particular means that the value is greatly reduced. I wonder if the fine becomes an administration debt - will the SFA only get keechpence in the pound if a CVA is achieved?

  24. #5423
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Back in the town
    Age
    60
    Posts
    11,883
    I must admit I am shocked at the severity of the punishment. I didn't believe SFA would be so harsh. Didn't think they had it in them.

    Sure they haven't sneaked in a penalty for the dual contracts as well or are they just trying to make us believe they are tough before letting us down?

  25. #5424
    Testimonial Due HibeeMG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Just back from down south
    Posts
    2,358
    Cue another delay in naming a preferred bidder. All the while bringing Ra Peeple's Club closer to liquidation. All good!

  26. #5425
    @hibs.net private member bringbackbenny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    across the forth
    Age
    52
    Posts
    1,631
    You have to applaud this poster for his remarkable insight :

    ' ****** them. No one likes us.'


    This one is none too happy either

    Complete non-co-operation with the SFA and/or the Scottish national team is the bare minimum I expect from our leaders from here on in.

    F every one of them - and double f the Edinburgh ******* who led us to this dark place
    Come in Agent Murray, your job is done

  27. #5426
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    28,962
    Quote Originally Posted by PatHead View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I must admit I am shocked at the severity of the punishment. I didn't believe SFA would be so harsh. Didn't think they had it in them.

    Sure they haven't sneaked in a penalty for the dual contracts as well or are they just trying to make us believe they are tough before letting us down?
    The dual-contracts are being investigated by the SPL. The SFA will be the appeals body, IIRC.

  28. #5427
    @hibs.net private member Northernhibee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Age
    38
    Posts
    19,842
    Quote Originally Posted by bringbackbenny View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The teddy bears on Rangers Media are taking it well ;-). Follow link at your own risk...

    http://forum.rangersmedia.co.uk/inde...ntry1059973898
    "

    You can't make this lot up.

    Let them get on with it, cream always rises."

    S*** floats


  29. #5428
    @hibs.net private member SteveHFC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Age
    31
    Posts
    22,203
    Rangers Media can cheer you up :)
    Less talk, more gifs. 21.05.16

  30. #5429
    @hibs.net private member SteveHFC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Age
    31
    Posts
    22,203
    Less talk, more gifs. 21.05.16

  31. #5430
    Quote Originally Posted by Caversham Green View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I would say that ownership = control and control must = participation. I wonder if the SFA can enforce their fine given that CW has been banished. It's surely not a legal sanction so I reckon Whyte could just tell them to do one.
    They can stop him being Chairman - that's effectively what they've done - but they can't force him to sell his shares. I'm reasonably confident that I'm right on this one. We shall see soon enough!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)