Boardroom and share shenanigans.

[greenlex]

https://www.hibernianfc.co.uk/article/an-update-to-the-hibs-board

This could be interesting from an investment point of view. I wonder if it’s done.

[HoboHarry]

Begbie on the board? This might get good.......

[JohnM1875]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

https://www.hibernianfc.co.uk/article/an-update-to-the-hibs-board

This could be interesting from an investment point of view. I wonder if it’s done.

Both local guys who support Hibs are they not?

[Carheenlea]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Begbie on the board? This might get good.......

[greenlex]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Both local guys who support Hibs are they not?

Yes

[CapitalGreen]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Both local guys who support Hibs are they not?

At least one posts on here.

[TrinityHFC]

Robert Begbie is an extremely intelligent and commercial guy. Good addition.

[Greencore]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

This could be interesting from an investment point of view. I wonder if it’s done.

How?
Just another appointment by the sounds of it.
Am I missing somthing ?

[CapitalGreen]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

How?
Just another appointment by the sounds of it.
Am I missing somthing ?

He is referring to the final paragraph. Which leads me further to think we will be seeing a new share issue in the future.

[greenlex]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

How?
Just another appointment by the sounds of it.
Am I missing somthing ?

If someone had just secured a 20% or whatever shareholding in the club you would assume he would want to have one of his own on the board. Has he invested or is he not now doing it? Is there another but if investment incoming?
Reporting a share discrepancy to companies house with a correction. What was it and how did it happen?

[TrinityHFC]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

He is referring to the final paragraph. Which leads me further to think we will be seeing a new share issue in the future.

Eh? It is just referring to previous mistakes. It isn’t live yet to see what those might be but doesn’t suggest anything about new shares.

[TrinityHFC]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

If someone had just secured a 20% or whatever shareholding in the club you would assume he would want to have one of his own on the board. Has he invested or is he not now doing it? Is there another but if investment incoming?
Reporting a share discrepancy to companies house with a correction. What was it and how did it happen?

We were two NEDs down, these are replacements. Future appointments can still happen.

[Lago]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

If someone had just secured a 20% or whatever shareholding in the club you would assume he would want to have one of his own on the board. Has he invested or is he not now doing it? Is there another but if investment incoming?
Reporting a share discrepancy to companies house with a correction. What was it and how did it happen?

Oh oh, are you suggesting that the big bucks are no longer incoming?

[Torto7]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

If someone had just secured a 20% or whatever shareholding in the club you would assume he would want to have one of his own on the board. Has he invested or is he not now doing it? Is there another but if investment incoming?
Reporting a share discrepancy to companies house with a correction. What was it and how did it happen?

Aren't they just replacing who's left? I doubt these two guys will have any impact on the proposed investment.

[greenlex]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Aren't they just replacing who's left? I doubt these two guys will have any impact on the proposed investment.

Wasn’t really suggesting that. I was suggesting that the investment hasn’t taken place yet or Foley would have his man/woman in.

[greenlex]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Oh oh, are you suggesting that the big bucks are no longer incoming?

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Aren't they just replacing who's left? I doubt these two guys will have any impact on the proposed investment.

Wasn’t really suggesting that. I was suggesting that the investment hasn’t taken place yet or Foley would surely have his man/woman in.

[JohnM1875]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Wasn’t really suggesting that. I was suggesting that the investment hasn’t taken place yet or Foley would have his man/woman in.

Ah! So by done you meant not happening, sorry. Misunderstood you.

[TrinityHFC]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Wasn’t really suggesting that. I was suggesting that the investment hasn’t taken place yet or Foley would surely have his man/woman in.

Not expected to be done until January.

[Lago]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Wasn’t really suggesting that. I was suggesting that the investment hasn’t taken place yet or Foley would surely have his man/woman in.

OK, whew 🤞

[CapitalGreen]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Eh? It is just referring to previous mistakes. It isn’t live yet to see what those might be but doesn’t suggest anything about new shares.

It’s my opinion the clean up is a precursor to a new share issue.

[Mick O'Rourke]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Not expected to be done until January.

I would have thought,not being an expert of course, that publicising any increase in share buy/investment if it is ,a sizeable amount would only play into the hands of other clubs/agents of players we might be interested in or approach .
Thats common sense i suppose
Dont show your hand

[HibeeSince85]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I would have thought,not being an expert of course, that publicising any increase in share buy/investment if it is ,a sizeable amount would only play into the hands of other clubs/agents of players we might be interested in or approach .
Thats common sense i suppose
Dont show your hand

Hibs would have to report this to Companies House so it couldn't go unnoticed.

[Mick O'Rourke]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Hibs would have to report this to Companies House so it couldn't go unnoticed.

I see
Maybe wait till after Jan window to bring other investors/investment on board
Is that a good idea to do that ?
Could be Monty has already identified players he wants and its just a waiting game.
Interesting time these windows

[HibeeSince85]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I see
Maybe wait till after Jan window to bring other investors/investment on board
Is that a good idea to do that ?
Could be Monty has already identified players he wants and its just a waiting game.
Interesting time these windows

Good idea to wait? I wouldn't and I doubt Hibs would either if there were significant funds to strengthen in January. Most clubs don't get fleeced just because they have funds it's the ones with daft owners like at Man U who don't know how to spend it. Foley comes with a network already in place so the Jan transfers would most likely come from those clubs anyway.

All IMO btw.

[TrinityHFC]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Hibs would have to report this to Companies House so it couldn't go unnoticed.

Not quite. Companies House filings are required for all companies for things like your accounts, confirmation statements and copies of special resolutions.

For investment there are a couple of scenarios. One would be us issuing new shares. Shareholders would hear about that proposal in advance and would vote on it by special resolution. The resolution would then be filed.

If existing shares were being sold to new shareholders in theory you wouldn’t clock that at companies house until the confirmation statement was due for the period the transaction took place. Of course Hibs would publicise it well before then.

Hibs have talked about a regular audit finding some issues. As I understand it the previous finance / company secretary team left things in a bit of a shambles so it could just be mistakes on the register that are now being sorted.

If you were to be cynical, it could have been spotted by investors doing their due diligence or spotted internally while preparing that info.

[bingo70]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Not quite. Companies House filings are required for all companies for things like your accounts, confirmation statements and copies of special resolutions.

For investment there are a couple of scenarios. One would be us issuing new shares. Shareholders would hear about that proposal in advance and would vote on it by special resolution. The resolution would then be filed.

If existing shares were being sold to new shareholders in theory you wouldn’t clock that at companies house until the confirmation statement was due for the period the transaction took place. Of course Hibs would publicise it well before then.

Hibs have talked about a regular audit finding some issues. As I understand it the previous finance / company secretary team left things in a bit of a shambles so it could just be mistakes on the register that are now being sorted.

If you were to be cynical, it could have been spotted by investors doing their due diligence or spotted internally while preparing that info.

Looking at your last paragraph, if it was that, why would they need to appoint two new people to the board for that?

Couldn’t they just fix the administrative error?

Appreciate that’s probably a stupid question but I don’t know how these things work.

[Green Badger]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Not quite. Companies House filings are required for all companies for things like your accounts, confirmation statements and copies of special resolutions.

For investment there are a couple of scenarios. One would be us issuing new shares. Shareholders would hear about that proposal in advance and would vote on it by special resolution. The resolution would then be filed.

If existing shares were being sold to new shareholders in theory you wouldn’t clock that at companies house until the confirmation statement was due for the period the transaction took place. Of course Hibs would publicise it well before then.

Hibs have talked about a regular audit finding some issues. As I understand it the previous finance / company secretary team left things in a bit of a shambles so it could just be mistakes on the register that are now being sorted.

If you were to be cynical, it could have been spotted by investors doing their due diligence or spotted internally while preparing that info.

That’s exactly what I thought when I read it. Must be a cynic.

[WeeRussell]

I read the first word as “bedroom” and was intrigued/concerned about what thread I was opening.

[Green Badger]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Looking at your last paragraph, if it was that, why would they need to appoint two new people to the board for that?

Couldn’t they just fix the administrative error?

Appreciate that’s probably a stupid question but I don’t know how these things work.

The two things are unrelated. Hibs just chose to announce them both at the same time.

[TrinityHFC]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Looking at your last paragraph, if it was that, why would they need to appoint two new people to the board for that?

Couldn’t they just fix the administrative error?

Appreciate that’s probably a stupid question but I don’t know how these things work.

Two different things.

They are appointing two Directors to replace the ones who are no longer there and then we are filing a replacement confirmation statement because there appears to have been some errors in the ones previously filed. These are things you file each year detailing amongst other things your share capital and transactions that have happened during the year.

It is a little unusual to mess that up but not unheard of!