Jambos Legal Challenge

**Dashing Bob S** · 15-06-2020 04:51 PM

Ha ha ha ignore this thread I can’t do it, it’s not fair

***blackpoolhibs*** · 15-06-2020 05:46 PM

yo yo.jpg

***allezsauzee*** · 15-06-2020 05:53 PM

Time to wheel out the old cash cow again to help them pay for it.

**MacGruber** · 15-06-2020 09:32 PM

Originally Posted by allezsauzee

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Time to wheel out the old cash cow again to help them pay for it.

Oi - it's Mrs Budge to you!

***O'Rourke3*** · 15-06-2020 09:36 PM

Originally Posted by allezsauzee

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Time to wheel out the old cash cow again to help them pay for it.

Not sure she will this time out....

Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk

**Hibiza** · 23-06-2020 05:49 PM

Originally Posted by blackpoolhibs

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

yo yo.jpg

Superb

***Keith_M*** · 23-06-2020 05:57 PM

"That the Members voting in favour of the Written Resolution did not adhere
to that Rule.

Instead, they exercised that voting power in a manner
amounting to oppression of a minority"

Wow! Just, Wow!

Maybe they should be taking this to The Human Rights Commission.

**Since452** · 23-06-2020 05:59 PM

Originally Posted by Keith_M

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

"That the Members voting in favour of the Written Resolution did not adhere
to that Rule.

Instead, they exercised that voting power in a manner
amounting to oppression of a minority"

Wow! Just, Wow!

Maybe they should be taking this to The Human Rights Commission.

Hearts trying to jump on the PC bandwagon. Shameless

***Bostonhibby*** · 23-06-2020 06:15 PM

Originally Posted by Keith_M

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

"That the Members voting in favour of the Written Resolution did not adhere
to that Rule.

Instead, they exercised that voting power in a manner
amounting to oppression of a minority"

Wow! Just, Wow!

Maybe they should be taking this to The Human Rights Commission.

How the **** can they claim to be a minority when there's 400,000 of them sharing a flat in Saughton alone?

Sent from my SM-A750FN using Tapatalk

***Eyrie*** · 23-06-2020 06:20 PM

Originally Posted by Keith_M

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

"That the Members voting in favour of the Written Resolution did not adhere
to that Rule.

Instead, they exercised that voting power in a manner
amounting to oppression of a minority"

Wow! Just, Wow!

Maybe they should be taking this to The Human Rights Commission.

I think you mean Yamnesty International.

***JohnMcM*** · 23-06-2020 06:23 PM

Where did this "oppression of a minority" thing come from? Is it a quote?

***CockneyRebel*** · 23-06-2020 06:39 PM

Originally Posted by Eyrie

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I think you mean Yamnesty International.

***nonshinyfinish*** · 23-06-2020 08:20 PM

Originally Posted by Eyrie

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I think you mean Yamnesty International.

Outstanding.

***1875godsgift*** · 24-06-2020 12:21 AM

Originally Posted by Keith_M

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

"That the Members voting in favour of the Written Resolution did not adhere
to that Rule.

Instead, they exercised that voting power in a manner
amounting to oppression of a minority"

Wow! Just, Wow!

Maybe they should be taking this to The Human Rights Commission.

To be honest, I can completely see their point - they ARE a minority -

A minority of 1 who finished bottom of the league!

To the 400.000 greetin'-faced throbbers looking in, remember......

You're never out-numbered.....

But you're always out-gunned.....

GGTTH

***Kato*** · 15-06-2020 07:52 PM

Originally Posted by Dashing Bob S

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Ha ha ha ignore this thread I can’t do it, it’s not fair

So is the second season of the Hearts' documentary going to be a court room drama?

Sent from my SM-A405FN using Tapatalk

***Irish_Steve*** · 15-06-2020 08:21 PM

What exactly is their legal challenge?

And if they are claiming compensation, what for? For being absolutely honking all season

I`d give them a tenner

**NYHibby** · 15-06-2020 08:26 PM

Originally Posted by Irish_Steve

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

What exactly is their legal challenge?

And if they are claiming compensation, what for? For being absolutely honking all season

I`d give them a tenner

I’ve been posting about this in the other thread today, but no one really knows.

I saw on legal twitter that they are supposedly judicial reviewing the April vote, but doing that makes no sense for various reasons. So it is most likely something else

**hibbydog** · 15-06-2020 08:27 PM

Anne Budge is making a royal fool of herself. Nobody ever thought that reconstruction proposed by the very club it’s designed to save from relegation had any credibility at all. And the legal challenge? Laughable.

Typical martyrdom from the arrogant & self interested who completely lack the humility to admit their mistakes and accept their fate.

But very, very pleasing !!!!!

**~~EI255~~** · 18-06-2020 09:01 PM

Originally Posted by Irish_Steve

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

What exactly is their legal challenge?

And if they are claiming compensation, what for? For being absolutely honking all season

I`d give them a tenner

I've got some 1980s Turkish notes they are welcome to use.

Sent from my LG-H870 using Tapatalk

***Chip shop Joe*** · 15-06-2020 08:50 PM

Anyone know who is representing Hearts in this court case?

**hibbydog** · 15-06-2020 08:53 PM

Originally Posted by Chip shop Joe

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Anyone know who is representing Hearts in this court case?

I want it to be Donald Findlay. It obviously won’t be, but he’s the right fit - bigoted, corrupt and has a perfect track record for defending the indefensible.

Hope he charges them double.

***Greenfly*** · 15-06-2020 09:33 PM

Originally Posted by hibbydog

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I want it to be Donald Findlay. It obviously won’t be, but he’s the right fit - bigoted, corrupt and has a perfect track record for defending the indefensible.

Hope he charges them double.

Donald Findlay didn't show much love for Hearts today. Never had any time for the guy but listen to today's Sportsound podcast - first time in a while that anyone on there has actually stood up to the Hearts cabal - didn't take any crap from English or Levein and made it clear that Cowden had voted no for what he described as ethical reasons.

**greenpaper55** · 15-06-2020 09:37 PM

Expel them from the league, let them find someone else to play with in August.

**Green Blood** · 15-06-2020 09:40 PM

There will be further court proceedings after this is thrown out as FOH will probably have to take Bodge to court to finally get their hands on their share of the club. She's power mad and is not letting go! They have raised over 10 million, fine effort but have nothing to show for it.

**Logie Green** · 15-06-2020 08:56 PM

Originally Posted by Chip shop Joe

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Anyone know who is representing Hearts in this court case?

Hopefully Leslie Deans.....

***Dr What If?*** · 15-06-2020 09:32 PM

Originally Posted by Logie Green

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Hopefully Leslie Deans.....

Thought they were protesting relegation, not buying a flat?

**NYHibby** · 15-06-2020 09:23 PM

Originally Posted by Chip shop Joe

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Anyone know who is representing Hearts in this court case?

Before people here attack whoever their advocate turns out to be, you have to remember that the cab-rank rule applies. Some poor sod could get stuck arguing this in court even if they are not a jambo

Hearts solicitors are fair game though

***Jamesie*** · 16-06-2020 05:57 AM

Originally Posted by NYHibby

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Before people here attack whoever their advocate turns out to be, you have to remember that the cab-rank rule applies. Some poor sod could get stuck arguing this in court even if they are not a jambo

Hearts solicitors are fair game though

While you’re right that the cab rank rule applies in theory, Hearts will have likely already identified and instructed an advocate of interest to take the instruction on based on his or her specialism in whichever area of law their challenge is based on.