hibs.net Messageboard

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Testimonial Due
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Livingston
    Posts
    2,196

    Rule changes for next season!!!!

    https://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.c...ason-1-4891038

    These are the rule changes created by IFAB for next season!!
    Some appear to be necessary, others are just more grey areas that after years will take a lot of getting used to.
    The one for penalty kicks is one which was particularly relevant to us, after Lewis for Aberdeen put us out the cup by coming from behind the line!!!


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by where'stheslope View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    https://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.c...ason-1-4891038

    These are the rule changes created by IFAB for next season!!
    Some appear to be necessary, others are just more grey areas that after years will take a lot of getting used to.
    The one for penalty kicks is one which was particularly relevant to us, after Lewis for Aberdeen put us out the cup by coming from behind the line!!!
    A lot of these seem anti-time wasting etc. Aberdeen as the masters of time wasting might struggle in general.

    One I would like to see, is to combat when a team repeatedly deliberately tries to take throw in from higher up the park, knowing the referee will move them back every time, again wasting time.

  4. #3
    Solipsist Eyrie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    PDSBRS
    Posts
    13,062
    Quote Originally Posted by Juniper Greens View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    A lot of these seem anti-time wasting etc. Aberdeen as the masters of time wasting might struggle in general.

    One I would like to see, is to combat when a team repeatedly deliberately tries to take throw in from higher up the park, knowing the referee will move them back every time, again wasting time.
    I'd go further.

    Any attempt to take a throw in any further up the park than where the ball went out results in the other team getting the throw in.

    I cna understand a player stealing a couple of yards when taking a quick throw in, but not the edging ten yards up the park that seems to be the norm.
    Mature, sensible signature required for responsible position. Good prospects for the right candidate. Apply within.

  5. #4
    @hibs.net private member ian cruise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    East Kilbride
    Posts
    4,349
    Quote Originally Posted by Eyrie View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'd go further.

    Any attempt to take a throw in any further up the park than where the ball went out results in the other team getting the throw in.

    I cna understand a player stealing a couple of yards when taking a quick throw in, but not the edging ten yards up the park that seems to be the norm.
    Total pet hate of mine, I think your suggestion is a great idea.

  6. #5
    @hibs.net private member Mibbes Aye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    15,550
    Quote Originally Posted by Eyrie View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'd go further.

    Any attempt to take a throw in any further up the park than where the ball went out results in the other team getting the throw in.

    I cna understand a player stealing a couple of yards when taking a quick throw in, but not the edging ten yards up the park that seems to be the norm.
    I agree with you but it would remove one of the great pantomime moments in the game when a player is trying to steal fifteen yards, in little blocks of five yards at a time and the opposition fans are screaming at the referee to do something about it
    There's only one thing better than a Hibs calendar and that's two Hibs calendars

  7. #6
    Testimonial Due
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Livingston
    Posts
    2,196
    List of amendments for next season:

    Handball

    The handball rule is one which provokes plenty of confusion and controversy. Now more situations have been outlined where handball should and should not be penalised. A deliberate handball remains an offence, and now the following situations, even if accidental, will be a free kick:
    • the ball goes into the goal after touching an attacking player’s hand/arm
    • a player gains control/possession of the ball after it has touches their hand/arm and then scores, or creates a goal-scoring opportunity
    • the ball touches a player’s hand/arm which has made their body unnaturally bigger
    • the ball touches a player’s hand/arm when it is above their shoulder (unless the player has deliberately played the ball which then touches their hand/arm) The following will not usually be a free kick, unless they are one of the above situations:
    • the ball touches a player’s hand/arm directly from their own head/body/foot or the head/body/foot of another player who is near.
    • the ball touches a player’s hand/arm which is close to their body and has not made their body unnaturally bigger.
    •if a player is falling and the ball touches their hand/arm when it is between their body and the ground to support the body (but not extended to make the body bigger)
    •If the goalkeeper attempts to ‘clear’ (release into play) a throw-in or deliberate kick from a team-mate but the ‘clearance’ fails, the goalkeeper can then handle the ball.

    Goal kick

    One of the biggest changes is to the goal kick. No longer will the ball have to be played outside the box before it is deemed in play. Players from either side can touch the ball inside the box. IFAB said: “The experiment that at a goal kick the ball is in play once it is kicked, and does not have to leave the penalty area, has created a faster and more dynamic/constructive restart to the game. It has reduced the time ‘lost/wasted’ including stopping the tactic of ‘wasting’ time when a defender deliberately plays the ball before it leaves the penalty area knowing that all that will happen is the goal kick will be retaken.” Opposition players have to be outside the box when the kick is taken, however.

    Substitutions

    Another of the big changes sees substitutions required to leave the field of play by the nearest point on the touchline/goal line - unless the referee indicates the player can leave quickly/immediately at the halfway line or a different point because of safety, injury etc. The alteration will stop players from time-wasting.

    Drop ball

    The IFAB have sought to do away with contested drop balls. If play is stopped inside the penalty area the ball will be dropped to the goalkeeper, while outside the box it will be dropped to a member of the team who last touched the ball at the point it was played. In all cases players from both sides need to be at least 4m (4.5 yards) away from the player who receives the ball. It was felt that the “current dropped ball procedure often leads to a ‘manufactured’ restart which is ‘exploited’ unfairly (e.g. kicking the ball out for a throw-in deep in the opponents’ half) or an aggressive confrontation”.

    Celebrating

    Players will continued to be booked for over celebrating, for example removing the shirt. A yellow card will be shown even if the goal is disallowed.
    Goalkeeper position on penalties Goalkeepers are required to have at least part of one foot on/in line with the goal line when the kick is taken and cannot stand behind the line. They are not allowed to be touching the goalposts/crossbar/nets.

    Quick free kicks

    Teams are now able to take a quick free-kick even if the offence is to be penalised by a yellow or red card. The referee can show the card at the next stoppage in play. The IFAB state: “Occasionally, an attack is stopped by a cautionable (YC) or sending-off (RC) offence and the attacking team takes a quick free kick which restores the ‘lost’ attack; it is clearly ‘unfair’ if this ‘new’ attack is stopped to issue the YC/RC. However, if the referee has distracted the offending team by starting the YC/RC procedure, the quick free kick is not allowed.”

    Walls at free kicks

    Attackers are not allowed to be within 1m (1yd) of a defensive wall of three or more. An offence from the attacker will result in an indirect free kick. The IFAB believe that attackers can “often cause management problems and waste time. There is no legitimate tactical justification for attackers to be in the ‘wall’ and their presence is against the ‘spirit of the game’ and often damages the image of the game”.


  8. #7
    Testimonial Due
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Livingston
    Posts
    2,196
    Last amendment:

    Cards for coaches

    Management staff can now be shown a yellow or red card if guilty of misconduct. If the “offender cannot be identified, the senior coach who is in the technical area at the time will receive” the card. Kick-off Teams who win the toss can choose to either take the kick-off or which goal to attack. Previously the only choice was which goal to attack.

  9. #8
    @hibs.net private member Bristolhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Chippenham/Bath
    Age
    43
    Posts
    8,542
    The golies touching the line at penalties is a good one. TBH I thought that was a law anyway.

    Rips my knitting with goalies about a yard and a half off their line.

    Also, shielding balls out for a bye kick. Blatant obstruction.

    J

  10. #9
    @hibs.net private member Speedy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    8,476
    Quote Originally Posted by Bristolhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The golies touching the line at penalties is a good one. TBH I thought that was a law anyway.

    Rips my knitting with goalies about a yard and a half off their line.

    Also, shielding balls out for a bye kick. Blatant obstruction.

    J
    Think the current rule is that they can't be in front of the line. This amendment is to stop keepers starting behind the line to get a running jump to close down the ball

  11. #10
    @hibs.net private member Bristolhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Chippenham/Bath
    Age
    43
    Posts
    8,542
    Quote Originally Posted by Speedy View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Think the current rule is that they can't be in front of the line. This amendment is to stop keepers starting behind the line to get a running jump to close down the ball
    So my gripe still stands? That said if it stops the running jump you could argue that it is that action that propelled them a yard and a half in front of the chalk.

    J

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)