Dylan McGeough

[pacoluna]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

It's not really obsessive though.

Lennon was the manager less than 4 weeks ago so he's still going to be a subject of discussion, particularly given the unknown circumstances of his departure.

People still talk about Butcher and Fenlon who left years ago but I haven't seen you getting all pernickety about those posts.

Have you emailed Bill Leckie to tell him to move on too?

Why don't they just start a thread or continue posting on Lennon threads rather bringing his name up on every single thread regardless of the topic. Grown men with a lot of spite it's seems to me, the reason? I'm not quite sure

Who cares about bill leckie.

[The 90+2]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Why don't they just start a thread or continue posting on Lennon threads rather bringing his name up on every single thread regardless of the topic. Grown men with a lot of spite it's seems to me, the reason? I'm not quite sure

Who cares about bill leckie.

Lennon's name was mentioned 13 times on the first page of this thread and that's to begin with. Yet you reply to me who posted with facts and stats instead of those posting speculation?

Weird.

[Hibbyradge]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Why don't they just start a thread or continue posting on Lennon threads rather bringing his name up on every single thread regardless of the topic. Grown men with a lot of spite it's seems to me, the reason? I'm not quite sure

Who cares about bill leckie.

I was told months ago, maybe even last season, that Dylan McGeoch didn't like working for Neil Lennon and that is now being cited as the one of the reasons for his departure to Sunderland.

This is a perfectly relevant place to discuss NL.

[pacoluna]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I was told months ago, maybe even last season, that Dylan McGeoch didn't like working for Neil Lennon and that is now being cited as the one of the reasons for his departure to Sunderland.

This is a perfectly relevant place to discuss NL.

Ok then.

[matty_f]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Ok then.

It is when it's relevant to the discussion, which it evidently is.

[pacoluna]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

It is when it's relevant to the discussion, which it evidently is.

Hearsay is only allowed on this board aslong as it's not about our board/Hibs it seems. Doesn't sit rite with me.

[Hibbyradge]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Hearsay is only allowed on this board aslong as it's not about our board/Hibs it seems. Doesn't sit rite with me.

When was hearsay about the board banned?

I've seen, and taken part in, many discussions about the board and what try might or might not have done/are doing.

The irony is that you're trying to stop people discussing our recent manager.

No-one is trying to stop discussion about the board.

[MWHIBBIES]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Hearsay is only allowed on this board aslong as it's not about our board/Hibs it seems. Doesn't sit rite with me.

Make your own forum then. Rumours from within the club have always been posted and discussed on here.

[marinello59]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Hearsay is only allowed on this board aslong as it's not about our board/Hibs it seems. Doesn't sit rite with me.

Not allowed. Utter garbage. Theres been plenty of it on here. Care to point me towards where something has been deleted for posting hearsay.

[pacoluna]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Not allowed. Utter garbage. Theres been plenty of it on here. Care to point me towards where something has been deleted for posting hearsay.

* Heavily criticized

Not allowed was perhaps too strong a statement.

It's the irony and hypocracy that i find strange.

Any hearsay about our club has been condemned by many on this site, correctly so however it's lacks sincerity when they are happy to use it against others.

[Hibbyradge]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

* Heavily criticized

Not allowed was perhaps to strong a statement.

It's the irony and hypocracy that i find strange.

You're trying to shut people down from discussing Neil Lennon. That's hypocritical.

No-one has ever tried to do that to people talking about the board.

If a poster disagrees with someone's comments then they're entitled to criticise them, heavily or otherwise, regardless of the subject matter.

Neil Lennon is no longer a Hibs employee so I imagine people are going to be less inclined to defend him compared to our own people.

[SquashedFrogg]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

It's the year 2050 and 90+2 is still posting about Neil lennon.

Why shouldn't we be referring to a person who played a significant, albeit short, part in our clubs history in 2050?

Or have I missed notification of a cut off period when previous managers can't be discussed?

Does our ex managers name make you feel uncomfortable?

[pacoluna]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

You're trying to shut people down from discussing Neil Lennon. That's hypocritical.

No-one has ever tried to do that to people talking about the board.

If a poster disagrees with someone's comments then they're entitled to criticise them, heavily or otherwise, regardless of the subject matter.

I'll continue to criticize the hypocracy of some on this board.

[pacoluna]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Why shouldn't we be referring to a person who played a significant, albeit short, part in our clubs history in 2050?

Or have I missed notification of a cut off period when previous managers can't be discussed?

Does our ex managers name make you feel uncomfortable?

You wanted to move on remember,so you keep telling us.

[Hibbyradge]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I'll continue to criticize the hypocracy of some on this board.

You're entitled to do so.

But you're the one being hypocritical this time.

90+2 posts loads of nonsense, but he wasn't even being controversial when you tried to shut him down.

[marinello59]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

* Heavily criticized

Not allowed was perhaps too strong a statement.

It's the irony and hypocracy that i find strange.

Any hearsay about our club has been condemned by many on this site, correctly so however it's lacks sincerity when they are happy to use it against others.

You are free to condemn any hearsay you disagree with. This isn’t the Oxford debating society, there are no debating rules other than to remain respectful of each other. For example we often wear green tinted glasses which can see us post something directly opposed to what we said last week. It inconsistency and occasional bias rather than hypocrisy though isn’t it?
This place really shouldn’t be taken too seriously.

[SquashedFrogg]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

You wanted to move on remember,so you keep telling us.

🤣 Struck a nerve? Let's put things into context here shall we. In the midst of a ding dong slanging match about Lennon, our board, new manager last week, I suggested that we all move on. Support the new man and ease off the board.

It was at a point where it was getting a bit out of hand. I pointed out I liked Lennon, was disappointed he wasn't our manager anymore, but had come round to the view that we should focus on moving forward. Arguing amongst ourselves wasn't doing anyone any good.

You then thought you'd be clever and suggest I move on. Missing the whole tone of my post.

FWIW I think most people have moved on. And can discuss Lennon in more civilised manner.

You however, still seem to have issues about simply hearing his name. Regardless of how it's referred to.

I find that a little bit odd.

[J-C]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Hearsay is only allowed on this board aslong as it's not about our board/Hibs it seems. Doesn't sit rite with me.

Every single thread on here that does not have any fact is hearsay, we've had 2 weeks of hearsay regarding Lennon, and countless more on other subjects before that. Every transfer thread is generally hearsay, the only thing we can state as fact is game day threads a nd anything posted by the official club statements. I think you're taken all this too seriously and need a wee lie down mate.

[Beefster]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

It's the year 2050 and 90+2 is still posting about Neil lennon.

You’re to blame for me having ‘In the Year 2525’ by Zager and Evans in my head all afternoon.

Next time, please pick a better song. Thanks.

[ancient hibee]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Why shouldn't we be referring to a person who played a significant, albeit short, part in our clubs history in 2050?

Or have I missed notification of a cut off period when previous managers can't be discussed?

Does our ex managers name make you feel uncomfortable?

That guy Hugh Shaw really fouled up in 1953.Should have won the league and the Coronation Cup.Won neither.

[One Day Soon]

Groundhog Day. Thread after thread after thread.

[Monts]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Hearsay is only allowed on this board aslong as it's not about our board/Hibs it seems. Doesn't sit rite with me.

Now who's hijacked the thread

[pacoluna]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Groundhog Day. Thread after thread after thread.

Correct.

[J-C]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Correct.

The only reason Lennon's name came up on this thread was a response as to why Dylan didn't stay at Hibs, Lennon's name will pop up in threads, especially as he's only just left the club, jeez we still talk about Turnbull, Butcher, Fenlon, Mixu etc.

[MyJo]

If there is any possibility that we could get McGeouch back in the summer we should be grabbing it with both hands.

[Hi Heid Yin]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Why don't they just start a thread or continue posting on Lennon threads rather bringing his name up on every single thread regardless of the topic. Grown men with a lot of spite it's seems to me, the reason? I'm not quite sure

Who cares about bill leckie.

It's become an obsession with some posters.

[lyonhibs]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I'll continue to criticize the hypocracy of some on this board.

You couldn't at least spell hypocrisy correctly could you?

[SquashedFrogg]

A perfectly reasoned and objective thread hijacked.

Shame really.

[pacoluna]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

A perfectly reasoned and objective thread hijacked.

Shame really.

Yup the same suspects.

[The 90+2]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Yup the same suspects.

In main, yourself.