hibs.net Messageboard

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 61 to 62 of 62
  1. #61
    @hibs.net private member Sylar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Lanark/Palo Alto
    Age
    38
    Posts
    17,517
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: sjmcg1304
    Livingston's manager makes a fair point for me: if the SFA suddenly decide these pitches should be banned, the SFA should be paying the clubs that DO have them, the money required to rip them out and put in a new grass surface.

    Because it was the SFA who allowed their installation in the first place (the change has to be approved by a committee) - if they suddenly change the goalposts and leave these clubs with no option but to replace them by demand, it should be up to them and not the clubs to fork up for it.


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #62
    Coaching Staff Haymaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Chatham, NJ, USA
    Age
    38
    Posts
    11,302
    Quote Originally Posted by DetroitHibs View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    If there was any truth to artificial pitches being better for the game and athlete's, then we'd see them in the EPL, La Liga and Serie A. The EPL and as far as I'm aware, Championship have all grass pitches and have the same weather as us. Grass has been and always will be the best conditions to play on.
    The epl and the football league are grass only.

    Sutton United said they'd refuse promotion should they get it as they'd be required to take up their Astro.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)