Darnell Johnson

[04Sauzee]

2 match ban after having his appeal rejected

[Northernhibee]

Joke. Someone needs to return the favour to Scott Brown next game.

[Billy Whizz]

Both these challenges were worse than Johnson’s, especially Paul McGinns

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47215971

[PaulSmith]

I can live with the 2 game ban for Johnson as it was a poor challenge.

What I don’t understand and the SFA need to explain is why they are satisfied that the McGinn forearm smash and Power’s kick into the face of Jack aren’t deemed as being worthy of a
ban.

[Tarrahib]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

2 match ban after having his appeal rejected

Darnell Johnson was not in the Hibs squad last Saturday.Why did hibs not accept the 2 match then and he would only have 1 more match to sit out.Hibs don't win many appeals in Glasgow anyway.

[Billy Whizz]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Darnell Johnson was not in the Hibs squad last Saturday.Why did hibs not accept the 2 match then and he would only have 1 more match to sit out.Hibs don't win many appeals in Glasgow anyway.

Don’t think they were offered it

[Wigson13]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Darnell Johnson was not in the Hibs squad last Saturday.Why did hibs not accept the 2 match then and he would only have 1 more match to sit out.Hibs don't win many appeals in Glasgow anyway.

I couldn't understand this either, he was injured last weekend anyway so surely it would have made sense just to accept the ban rather than take the risk of having him miss important games in the near future!

[BILLYHIBS]

What about Scotty Brown getting off with murder with his late slow mistimed tackles Compliance Officer should look at Celtic

[Aim Here]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

2 match ban after having his appeal rejected

I was under the impression that compliance-officer retroactive punishments weren't awarded if the referees saw and punished the relevant infringement, which was definitely the case last Wednesday. I'm sure that was the case with some fairly recent rulings. Am I mistaken, or are the SFA making the rules up as they go along, again?

[MartinfaePorty]

I think that was the case previously, but this has been changed

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

[neil7908]

SFA are corrupt. The game in this country is a joke.

[B.H.F.C]

The Kilmarnock boy got off with a head height challenge. No further action.

This compliance officer woman just makes it up as she goes along. No consistency.

[Sir David Gray]

What an absolute farce.

[calumhibee1]

This is setting a precedent now. Even though he was booked at the time he has now been banned. There appears to be no consistency with retrospective action. Steve Clarke was right to question why Defoe wasn’t banned and we should be asking why Scott brown isn’t .

[calumhibee1]

It seems no matter if action is taken at the time or not it can be reviewed which we were led to believe couldn’t happen if a referee had dealt with it at the time

[Monktonhall 7]

And yet the 3 separate incidents that Morelos was cited for were all swept away because Beaton said he was aware of them at the time. Hibs need to grow a pair and challenge this.

[we are hibs]

Fair enough. Was a bad challenge. The main gripe seems to be that he has been pulled up yet players from certain other clubs seem to be immune from it. Scottish football. Not corrupt in any way though, eh?

[green day]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

And yet the 3 separate incidents that Morelos was cited for were all swept away because Beaton said he was aware of them at the time. Hibs need to grow a pair and challenge this.

Hibs already challenged it as they didnt accept the initial offer - the SFA "experts" looked at it and he was given the ban.

[HIGHLANDLEITHER]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I think that was the case previously, but this has been changed

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Has it definitely been changed? Can anyone explain why no action could be taken after the last Celtic Sevco’s match when Beaton was said to have seen the incidents involving Morelos so no further action could be taken. I haven’t seen the Johnson tackle and wouldn’t disagree if the evidence is right but as ever the SFA apply rules with no consistency except to make sure their favoured team is not brought to justice.
Another reason not to just “ move on”.

[Joe6-2]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Has it definitely been changed? Can anyone explain why no action could be taken after the last Celtic Sevco’s match when Beaton was said to have seen the incidents involving Morelos so no further action could be taken. I haven’t seen the Johnson tackle and wouldn’t disagree if the evidence is right but as ever the SFA apply rules with no consistency except to make sure their favoured team is not brought to justice.
Another reason not to just “ move on”.

Fed up with Hibs seemingly 'rolling over', not speaking up for themselves

[JohnM1875]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Fed up with Hibs seemingly 'rolling over', not speaking up for themselves

Would be class if we had a manager in place who could stand up for us...

[Joe6-2]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Would be class if we had a manager in place who could stand up for us...

Yes, but feel the board should speak up

[matty_f]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Fed up with Hibs seemingly 'rolling over', not speaking up for themselves

Didn't we just appeal the decision?

[Joe6-2]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Didn't we just appeal the decision?

Yeah, but if the ref saw the incident I thought no retrospective punishment could be dished out?

[green day]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Fed up with Hibs seemingly 'rolling over', not speaking up for themselves

As I said above, Hibs already challenged it as they didnt accept the initial offer - the SFA "experts" looked at it and he was given the ban.

[green day]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Yeah, but if the ref saw the incident I thought no retrospective punishment could be dished out?

That rule has changed

[MartinfaePorty]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Has it definitely been changed? Can anyone explain why no action could be taken after the last Celtic Sevco’s match when Beaton was said to have seen the incidents involving Morelos so no further action could be taken. I haven’t seen the Johnson tackle and wouldn’t disagree if the evidence is right but as ever the SFA apply rules with no consistency except to make sure their favoured team is not brought to justice.
Another reason not to just “ move on”.

https://www.scottishfa.co.uk/media/3...-jpp-18_19.pdf


Section 13.3 refers. I was going to copy and paste the relevant bits, but lost the will to live looking through this! To summarise; it appears that if there was some aspect to the tackle that the ref didn't see, then it's fair game for the Compliance Officer, even if a booking was administered at the time.

[B.H.F.C]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

As I said above, Hibs already challenged it as they didnt accept the initial offer - the SFA "experts" looked at it and he was given the ban.

We should call them out publicly. We won’t. We never do. Don’t want to rock the boat.

[green day]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

We should call them out publicly. We won’t. We never do. Don’t want to rock the boat.

Do you think we should concentrate on that at this point? I think getting a manager is more important.

Not being flippant, but the tackle was bad - you could say it was reckless, not sure we have a leg to stand on, tbh.

The issue is that there were several terrible challenges both in that match and subsequently which have not been punished. Do you think that the SFA are favouring Killie and St Mirren as well as Rangers / Celtic over Hibs?

Anything said would need to sound sensible and not just like some pish off twitter.

[silverhibee]

Just wait until McGregor gets of with his tomorrow, should be fun, but seriously folks, let's just move on eh, our club are happy to be involved in a corrupt system that favours 2 clubs.