Its not as simple as being "slaughtered for posting rumours"This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
He took the huff because of the Scott Allan stuff he posted at the end of the summer window.
To summarise - he came on the PM board and said that he knew for a fact that the Allan deal was nailed, but that Dempster had pulled it last minute, Scott Allan was raging at us etc. But that he wouldnt go "public" with that, that it would all come out in the media etc etc.
10 minutes later, he posted that detail on the Main Board, cue some radges abusing Dempster on Twitter etc - some pretty nasty stuff.
Me and a few others told him he was irresponsible to do that, especially when it wasnt clear what had happened or even if there was a deal about to happen.
Later still, he came on and said "actually, it wasnt Dempsters doing"..................
So, after telling the world that Dempster was "at fault", her being abused on Twitter, people telling him it was irresponsible - he took the huff and hasnt posted since.
If I read last nights stuff correctly, apparently he posted something on Twitter then deleted it..........................sounding all too familiar?
If you are genuinely ITK, then thats fine, but you need to take some responsibility - and understand there are potential consequences to your online ramblings.
Results 61 to 75 of 75
Thread: Whittaker away?
-
26-01-2019 05:40 AM #61
-
26-01-2019 08:10 AM #62This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I don’t know the ins and outs of this particular one but some of the stick folk get for posting roomers is ridiculous, at the end of the day they’re just rumours - some folk go in these gossip threads just to moan about the speculation. Anyway, I’m going off topic.
As I say, I’m just repeating what I seen on Twitter.
-
26-01-2019 08:37 AM #63This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
26-01-2019 08:47 AM #64This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
26-01-2019 08:52 AM #65This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
26-01-2019 08:56 AM #66
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 5,045
Back on subject.
OP suggests rumours that Whittaker is gone too. Absolutely nothing else seems to have come to light so far to say it’s true. Is there any update on this at all? Let’s face it, if it is true it suggests much deeper problems in the first team pool than a change of manager will quickly fix. This has Butcer proportions written all over it.
Oh! And I miss the Cat
-
26-01-2019 09:01 AM #67This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
26-01-2019 09:01 AM #68
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 259
Past his best as a player , but knows the game , can cover a few positions in our time of need , and I don’t think he was on huge wages , maybe getting the same money for 3 yrs as he was offered for 2 yrs , just benefiting on tax etc,
-
26-01-2019 09:02 AM #69
- Join Date
- Jun 2014
- Posts
- 6,671
He’s not been sacked or suspended
-
26-01-2019 09:03 AM #70
Whittaker is still far from being a bad player. He gets a ridiculous amount of undeserved stick.
Follow the Hibs podcast, Longbangers, on Twitter (@longbangers)
https://longbangers.hubwave.net
-
26-01-2019 09:04 AM #71
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Posts
- 17,102
Might end up picking the team tomorrow.
-
26-01-2019 09:05 AM #72
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 22,626
Whitts biggest issue is Lennon playing him week in week out, and suggesting hes the only player that wants to play. He a good experienced cover player. Not a RB at top level.
-
26-01-2019 09:06 AM #73
- Join Date
- Sep 2018
- Location
- Greenland
- Posts
- 1,389
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
26-01-2019 09:06 AM #74This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
26-01-2019 09:08 AM #75
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Posts
- 2,479
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks