Highlights

[alihibs1]

Anyone got a link?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

[BOB MARLEYS DUG]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Anyone got a link?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

https://hibstv.hibernianfc.co.uk/tv/video/vod/5174

[bigwheel]

Never mind the highlights...who was this, go on admit it..and what's it all,about?? #fullrefkit


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Chorley Hibee]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Never mind the highlights...who was this, go on admit it..and what's it all,about?? #fullrefkit


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

That's hilarious! 😂

[matty_f]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Never mind the highlights...who was this, go on admit it..and what's it all,about?? #fullrefkit


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

That's a weird thing to do, eh?

My guess is that it's someone who referees kids games and has come straight from a game.

[hfc rd]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Never mind the highlights...who was this, go on admit it..and what's it all,about?? #fullrefkit


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

That’s excellent 😂😂

[flash]

That penalty is clear as day. Strange that some people are saying it wasn't after seeing such clear evidence.

[MSK]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

That's a weird thing to do, eh?

My guess is that it's someone who referees kids games and has come straight from a game.

He does, came in half way through first half

[Jack Hackett]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Never mind the highlights...who was this, go on admit it..and what's it all,about?? #fullrefkit


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Hibs Class!

Nobody does piss takes like a Hibby

[MyJo]

The way things are going the SFA will probably uphold that red card, give Stewart a 2 game ban and award our three points to Rangers

[wookie70]

Very tricky call for the penalty. Even freeze framing makes it difficult to tell who got their foot in front first. Tangle of legs for me but well done Jamie asking the question and our luck has turned this year with decisions. About time after being on the wrong end of them for about 40 years.

[Peevemor]

The pitchside highlights on Hibs TV leave no room for doubt.

[Michael]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Never mind the highlights...who was this, go on admit it..and what's it all,about?? #fullrefkit


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

He should be our mascot haha

[CMurdoch]

At the game it didn't look like a penalty.
But watching back frame by frame it is wonderfully clever play by MacLaren to get his foot in the gap between the ball and Broadfoots foot just as Broadfoot is about to kick the ball.

[MyJo]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

At the game it didn't look like a penalty.
But watching back frame by frame it is wonderfully clever play by MacLaren to get his foot in the gap between the ball and Broadfoots foot just as Broadfoot is about to kick the ball.

it was a conscious decision from MacLaren to put his foot in there knowing contact would be made. Was it enough to make him fall over like he did, no, but we all know he wouldn’t have got a penalty had he stayed on his feet so he went to ground.

Not particularly sportsmanlike but it was smart from McLaren and won us the game so alls we’ll that ends well.......I’d be raging if that decision was against us though

[The Green Goblin]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Never mind the highlights...who was this, go on admit it..and what's it all,about?? #fullrefkit


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The boy who thinks he’s Joaquin Phoenix in Gladiator giving it the emperor’s thumbs down is pretty funny too.

[Jim Herriot]

Highlights also now up on the BBC site at https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/45456587

[ekhibee]

At the game I didn't think it was a penalty and having watched the highlights on Sportscene I still don't think it should've been a penalty. But it was good to get 3 points against a good team.

[neil7908]

Ours was definitely a penalty but Efe's challenge at the end should have been a pen for the them aswell. Foot was high and he took their player out.

We got lucky with that one.

[Tarrahib]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

The boy who thinks he’s Joaquin Phoenix in Gladiator giving it the emperor’s thumbs down is pretty funny too.

I think the guy sitting to the left behind the guy with the red card is on Police Scotland's most wanted list.

[Hibbyradge]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

At the game I didn't think it was a penalty and having watched the highlights on Sportscene I still don't think it should've been a penalty. But it was good to get 3 points against a good team.

I'd have been complaining if that had been given against us, but I think the referee got it right by the letter of the law, which says;

"Direct free kick

A direct free kick is awarded if a player commits any of the following offences against an opponent in a manner considered by the referee to be careless, reckless or using excessive force:

charges
jumps at
kicks or attempts to kick
pushes
strikes or attempts to strike (including head-butt)
tackles or challenges
trips or attempts to trip

If an offence involves contact it is penalised by a direct free kick or penalty kick.

Careless is when a player shows a lack of attention or consideration when making a challenge or acts without precaution. No disciplinary sanction is needed."

The defender wasn't deliberately trying to kick Jamie because he didn't realise that he was about to challenge for the ball, but the ref must have thought he showed a lack of attention because of that.

Does that make sense?

[Prof. Shaggy]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Never mind the highlights...who was this, go on admit it..and what's it all,about?? #fullrefkit


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

It's Willie Collum, isn't it?

[Tarrahib]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

It's Willie Collum, isn't it?

Naw I think it's big G!!

[PatHead]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I'd have been complaining if that had been given against us, but I think the referee got it right by the letter of the law, which says;

"Direct free kick

A direct free kick is awarded if a player commits any of the following offences against an opponent in a manner considered by the referee to be careless, reckless or using excessive force:

charges
jumps at
kicks or attempts to kick
pushes
strikes or attempts to strike (including head-butt)
tackles or challenges
trips or attempts to trip

If an offence involves contact it is penalised by a direct free kick or penalty kick.

Careless is when a player shows a lack of attention or consideration when making a challenge or acts without precaution. No disciplinary sanction is needed."

The defender wasn't deliberately trying to kick Jamie because he didn't realise that he was about to challenge for the ball, but the ref must have thought he showed a lack of attention because of that.

Does that make sense?

That definition would mean the Hearts goal should have been disallowed