Can anyone explain why the Scottish Tv revenues are so low, even whilst compared to countries like Norway, Greece, Hungary etc. Surely our game has more appeal than those leagues to a broader audience?
Is it a hangover from our failed SPL football fiasco all those years ago?
Results 31 to 60 of 104
Thread: NHC. EPL small team spending!
-
12-08-2018 08:41 AM #31
-
12-08-2018 08:46 AM #32
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Age
- 68
- Posts
- 5,841
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
https://www.theguardian.com/football...-guide-2016-17
Bournemouth match income £5m but TV income £124m.
Totally bonkers! Clubs like Bournemouth, Swansea and Burnley are not getting much more income from gates than Hibs, Hearts and Aberdeen (if you discount a factor because the average ticket prices are higher just because it is the EPL). However, whereas Hibs, Hearts and Aberdeen are getting £1-2m TV money, the EPL clubs mentioned are each getting well over £100m TV money.
I know our TV deal is awful, but £100m+ a year to drift around the lower reaches of the EPL and make up the fixture list for TV is totally crazy.
-
12-08-2018 08:48 AM #33
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Age
- 68
- Posts
- 5,841
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
-
12-08-2018 08:49 AM #35This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-08-2018 08:53 AM #36This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Clearly it’s part of the game but I struggle to get interested in Watford vs Brighton
-
12-08-2018 08:57 AM #37This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Not so different from the art world. Things are worth what people are prepared to pay for them - people, in this case, being hugely wealthy individuals.
-
12-08-2018 08:57 AM #38This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-08-2018 09:00 AM #39This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-08-2018 09:03 AM #40
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Age
- 68
- Posts
- 5,841
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
-
12-08-2018 09:13 AM #42
How do the Danes and Norweedgies get so much?
Imagine if our clubs got similar, surely we would see an equivalent rise in our teams performance levels in European competition?
-
12-08-2018 09:16 AM #43
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Age
- 36
- Posts
- 1,674
Obviously I want Scotland to get more money but not to the detriment of youth coming thru at clubs which I think would happen if we were to receive more tv money.
-
12-08-2018 09:21 AM #44This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-08-2018 09:26 AM #45
NHC. EPL small team spending!
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-08-2018 09:31 AM #46
- Join Date
- Feb 2017
- Posts
- 2,090
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-08-2018 09:34 AM #47
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 10,655
A key advantage in Scotland is that a clubs revenue and spend on players is mainly driven by fan support. Ok Celtic get £££ from CL but on the whole the better players gravitate to the best supported clubs. Look at Hibs. 14k season tickets buys us Neil Lennon and an excellent squad of players. If we had Sky money up here, ticket revenue would be dwarfed and you’d find Livi, Dundee and the likes attracting players on same wages as Hibs, with crowds a third the size. It’s a distortion of the market.
-
12-08-2018 09:43 AM #48
Although the money in EPL is obscene what annoys me more is the Doncasters and Port Vale’s who despite there low attendances can attract quality players by huge wages, the money filters down through the leagues. Read somewhere the Championship is the 5th richest league in the world. Hibs with average 18000 last year are poppers in comparison. Our top brass really need a better tv deal as I think our league is getting more interesting every year. It needs investment badly.
-
12-08-2018 09:58 AM #49This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
i know of people in England who have lost all interest in the premier league because they can’t identify with it anymore. The money is mind boggling and they don’t feel any sort of communal connection to their club that they used to have. Granted they aren’t missed by the clubs when they cancel their season tickets that they’ve had for maybe 30 or 40 years through good times and bad, because there will always be people to replace them, but I still find that sad.
Its why non league and lower league football down south has become more popular recently.
no-one can dispute the quality of the football in the English premier league. But I do feel that something more important is being lost.
while I don’t ever foresee Scotland getting the same sort of investment we should be careful what we wish for.
-
12-08-2018 10:55 AM #50
- Join Date
- Jul 2018
- Posts
- 83
Scotland's figure seems within normal parameters, based on the TV deals in a number of countries on that graphic. The deals in Sweden, Austria & Switzerland - countries with populations of 8 to 10 million - are similar. Combining the words "Portugal" and "football" will get you a reaction internationally. Combining "Scotland" and "football" won't. Is Rangers v. Celtic really any more captivating than Boca v. River?
Comparing any league anywhere to the English Premier League is a long way from being an "apples for apples" comparison.
The bottom line is economics. Scotland is still a largely mono-ethnic and mono-cultural backwater. The percentage of the world's population that knows Scotland exists is surprisingly small. The country attracts little foreign "investment" of the type that flows into London and which makes London the capital of the world. Large numbers of "investors" in London are loaded with "new money." They are from backgrounds that find football attractive.
Traditional European aristocracy "old money" and American "old money" is rarely invested in football. Nor is it invested in gold-plated Lamborghinis. Or at the tables of London's rapidly multiplying casinos.
"Vulgar" is the word that springs to mind.
London is an incredible place. It's the bubble of London's economy that produces the byproduct of the English Premier League bubble.
To say that London's increasing affluence is the result of money-laundering isn't strictly true. However, the UK's ridiculously inept legislation on transparency for offshore companies and its proliferation of tax loopholes means money-laundering on a massive scale is almost certainly easier and more profitable to accomplish via setting-up murky offshore companies and buying property in the UK than any other method. Most of the investment in London is by Russians, Arabs, Malaysians, Chinese - especially Chinese - and other dubious "got rich quick" overseas spivs buying vast quantities of property. Many of them also buy businesses - principally in the leisure sector.
They invest in London because The Party, His Majesty, El Presidente or Comrade Putin can't suddenly enact legislation that greatly devalues - or appropriates😂 - their investment.
Comrade Corbyn or Mayor Sadiq Khan could suggest a massive tax or even a ban on property purchases by foreigners. That's hardly radical. There are lots of places where one must be a citizen, resident, tax-payer or all three in order to buy property.
No such noises coming from those directions though. London's housing crisis continues to escalate. As does the scale of residential property development in prime areas of the English capital. Most of it bought by overseas "businessmen" as an investment. Their kids can stay in it while doing eyewateringly expensive degrees at Imperial College or the London School of Economics - two institutions whose own recent property purchases in South Kensington and Bloomsbury, neither exactly ghettos, have seen them become inner-city suburbs in themselves.
Whilst in London, the "investors" see toys. They like toys. They buy toys. Football clubs are excellent toys. Hours of interactive fun for all the family. These "investors" own companies back home. Marketing their toy through these companies can help recoup the purchase price of the toy or at least contribute towards the toy's running costs.
Of course, it would be a lot better for the planet's economy as a whole if the mega-rich invested their billions in their own countries. London's economy is nice for the Poles, Filipinos, Brazilians, Ghanaians etc. who work for £8.50 per hour serving you coffee in Starbucks or delivering your Domino's pizza. They can send some much needed money home. It would benefit a hell of a lot more working class people in poor countries if the rich people in those countries invested their money in creating wealth (& jobs) back home. Could even invest it in football or other youth/community projects for poor kids... But then that applies equally to those domestic idiots funding Kelty Hearts, Salford City and Billericay Town.
Can't see it happening soon though.
While London continues to get rich on dubious financial practices, the English Premier League will continue to fall into the beady-eyed glances of the culturally diverse selection of the planet's mafiosi who are attracted to London.
The crane numbers on London's skyline suggests Brexit is having as much effect on keeping down invasive parasites as DDT had on keeping down invasive parasites that developed resistance in the 1950s.
While London's bubble keeps growing, the English Premier League bubble is safe.
I've composed this rant on a phone while bouncing about on a train. A bit of time to kill. Hope it makes some sort of sense.Last edited by EricStoner; 12-08-2018 at 10:58 AM.
-
12-08-2018 11:20 AM #51
In response to Eric Stoner........
Scotland is far from being mono ethnic or a mono cultural backwater... we have world known universities, science and technology, musicians, authors, actors....what a cringeworthy statement!
There are no Portuguese teams called River ior Boca and I would suggest that Scotland as a country is known throughout the world, that’s why we attract tourism from across the globe. That in it’s self generates serious economic benefits.
Still baffled how the Danish league generates more than double the cash that ours does. No one seems to be able to explain this. I wonder what the people who run our game would say to that question?
-
12-08-2018 11:28 AM #52
- Join Date
- Jun 2016
- Posts
- 2,137
I think the "our game is total ***** but we've got 4 Old Frim derbies a season!!" marketing from the suits explains the TV deal money.
-
12-08-2018 11:40 AM #53This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-08-2018 11:50 AM #54
- Join Date
- Jul 2018
- Posts
- 83
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
1,000 urban Chinese. All in 1m+ population cities. Randomly selected. Asked if they can point to Scotland on a map.
Sweep. Fiver in each. Pick the number of the 1,000 Chinese who can point to Scotland. Closest takes the pot. You put in your fiver. What number would you go for?
I'd go well below 50.
-
12-08-2018 12:00 PM #55
- Join Date
- Jul 2018
- Posts
- 83
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-08-2018 12:00 PM #56This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
On top of that, the NBA, NFL bubble has never burst. They pay bigger wages than the Premier League.
-
12-08-2018 12:04 PM #57This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
All the other bodies talk up their game. Ours does the opposite and believes the only sellable aspect of our game is the Old Firm.
-
12-08-2018 12:17 PM #58
- Join Date
- May 2018
- Posts
- 1,192
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-08-2018 12:29 PM #59
Is it down the authorities here or is it simply lack of demand?
Most teams barely get a few thousand to turn up each weekend to watch them.
Where are the hundreds of thousands of armchair fans required to ensure that tv companies pay more?
Te viewing figures for most games here, other than the old firm, are minuscule. In these other countries they have audiences of millions, we simply don’t.
If we did, the tv companies would charge a hell of a lot more for advertising and in return would pay more to show our game.
Scotland has extremely passionate fans about football, but not nearly enough of them.
-
12-08-2018 12:38 PM #60
Another point to consider.
BT recently stopped showing the Italian league as they didn’t want to pay more for it.
They don’t show the Norwegian League, or the Slovakian one or whatever. Why? Because there isn’t the interest in them in the UK. We want the German, Italian, Spanish and French leagues.
So BT or Sky pay millions to these countries for the rights to show their leagues. Similarly these other countries pay billions to show the English game.
Which other countires are out there wanting to pay to show the SPFL?
Now you could argue that it’s up to the authorities to make the sales pitch and get these deals but I’d suggest that’s a pretty hard sell when folk living a stones throw from their own stadiums don’t even care!
Its just the way it is. These leagues operate on a different planet to the rest of the game. It won’t end any time soon but it’s basically going to be a cartel of the top 10 or clubs playing each other.
Theyll soon get bored when Madrid win everything each year.
Meanwhile the rest of us throughout Europe can crack on.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks