Beaton

[Jones28]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

As I said on the match thread, Kamberi fouled the Saints player. Correct decision.

It was Hanlon? Nah I disagree, went down like a sack of proverbial

[One Day Soon]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Must just be me but I wouldn’t have gave a red for that either.

He’s slide tackled him when he’s been on the break and brought him down, of course it looks worse slowed down and you see the point of contact etc.

It was a good foul from St Johnstone’s point of view and one I would have expect a Hibs player to make if it was roles reversed.

I think you're right, it's just you.

[jodjam]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

When was the last game changing decision that went in our favour? (Genuine question)

Darren Jackson was fouled outside box at Ibrox. Penalty given and we won 1-0. We are still paying for that decision

[SquashedFrogg]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Must just be me but I wouldn’t have gave a red for that either.

He’s slide tackled him when he’s been on the break and brought him down, of course it looks worse slowed down and you see the point of contact etc.

It was a good foul from St Johnstone’s point of view and one I would have expect a Hibs player to make if it was roles reversed.

He booted him 2 yards away from the ball?

Ball = 2 yards away

How can that not be classed as reckless and dangerous?

[green day]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

It was Hanlon? Nah I disagree, went down like a sack of proverbial

If our defender was manhandled like that we would want a foul.

Let's not get hung up on that decision, FFS the reason we ended up with one point is effing rocky!

[maturehibby]

Hanson did put a hand in his back and did slightly push him
If it had been a Grrs player it would not have been a foul

[gaz1875]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

If our defender was manhandled like that we would want a foul.

Let's not get hung up on that decision, FFS the reason we ended up with one point is effing rocky!

[Bob1875]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Yes, but not a thug's game. Or a cheating primadonna in black's game.

Granted, Saints were dirty tonight. But if we start sending players off for professional fouls, we’ll be struggling. As for the guy saying, the one on Mcginn was knee high, watch it again! He basically boots his ankles.

[ACLeith]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Darren Jackson was fouled outside box at Ibrox. Penalty given and we won 1-0. We are still paying for that decision

Not sure about the smiley Paul. Think you may be right

[bingo70]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

If our defender was manhandled like that we would want a foul.

Let's not get hung up on that decision, FFS the reason we ended up with one point is effing rocky!

Rocky has also won us numerous points this season so although he made a bad mistake tonight let’s not be too quick to hang him out to dry.

[Jones28]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

If our defender was manhandled like that we would want a foul.

Let's not get hung up on that decision, FFS the reason we ended up with one point is effing rocky!

Agree with your last point, so daft.

[we are hibs]

it was similar to the tackle that rat paterson had on malonga at easter road a few years back, nowhere near the ball and no intention on playing the ball

[SmashinGlass]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Granted, Saints were dirty tonight. But if we start sending players off for professional fouls, we’ll be struggling. As for the guy saying, the one on Mcginn was knee high, watch it again! He basically boots his ankles.

I disagree, if we started sending players off for 'professional' fouls, it would mean there would be far less, as it would be a much more thought provoking decision to make. As things stand, it's easy to take one for the team and stop play. If it's a red, then we make the player consider the repercussions of the incident and the aftermath, not just the yellow card.

[The_Horde]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

So Mcginn should have been sent off aswell for his professional foul? It’s a mans game.

One was high and dangerous. The other wasn't.

[Dashing Bob S]

Beaton was correct to send off Rocky. It was a simple error of judgement on our keepers part. Very rare, so let’s accept it and move on. He subsequently crapped out doing anything that would reduce a liberty taking St Johnstone to ten men though. He was a total hun fanny.

[Monts]

I don't think it was a red. It was a deliberate foul, but not preventing a clear goal scoring opportunity. And I don't think there was any danger mcginn could've broken his leg, as Gary Parker suggested.

[overdrive]

I used to think when he first broke through as a top flight ref that he was one of the better ones. That was until Stubbs’ first game in charge and the Handling sending off.

He’s a disgraceful corrupt cheat. How that wasn’t a sending off tonight, I don’t know.

[California-Hibs]

Alston was a red, no shadow of a doubt, absolutely disgraceful! The ‘foul’ by Hanlon before McGregors goal is soft. Saints got off the hook because as close as were to winning with 10, I’m convinced if we kept 11 on the park we’d of strolled it

[B.H.F.C]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Granted, Saints were dirty tonight. But if we start sending players off for professional fouls, we’ll be struggling. As for the guy saying, the one on Mcginn was knee high, watch it again! He basically boots his ankles.

Ankles or knees, the point is he deliberately booted McGinn with no intention of going for the ball. At the pace he went in he could easily have injured him. That’s not just a cynical foul.

[matty_f]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

If our defender was manhandled like that we would want a foul.

Let's not get hung up on that decision, FFS the reason we ended up with one point is effing rocky!

If it had been the defender doing that to Hanlon there is no danger we're getting a penalty for it.

[overdrive]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I don't think it was a red. It was a deliberate foul, but not preventing a clear goal scoring opportunity.

Eh? So a sending off can only be if it is a goal scoring opportunity? In that case, you’d never see a sending off anywhere but in the vicinity of the two boxes.

[kaimendhibs]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

So Mcginn should have been sent off aswell for his professional foul? It’s a mans game.

Aye. Very good.

Sent from my VTR-L09 using Tapatalk

[kaimendhibs]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

As I said on the match thread, Kamberi fouled the Saints player. Correct decision.

Really. It was Hanlon who was involved

Sent from my VTR-L09 using Tapatalk

[kaimendhibs]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

As I said on the match thread, Kamberi fouled the Saints player. Correct decision.

Good job you aren't a ref. Kamberi was nowhere near it

Sent from my VTR-L09 using Tapatalk

[SRHibs]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Eh? So a sending off can only be if it is a goal scoring opportunity? In that case, you’d never see a sending off anywhere but in the vicinity of the two boxes.

Professional foul is a yellow is it not? It was a bit of a cynical challenge but I do t think it was a red. Marciano decision was correct too IMO.

There seems to be a thread about the ref every time we don’t win.

[Monts]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Eh? So a sending off can only be if it is a goal scoring opportunity? In that case, you’d never see a sending off anywhere but in the vicinity of the two boxes.

It wasn't a dangerous challenge. It was a challenge designed to stop mcginn. People have said he should've got red because he didn't try to play the ball. That only matters for goal scoring opportunities.

[green day]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Rocky has also won us numerous points this season so although he made a bad mistake tonight let’s not be too quick to hang him out to dry.

I'm not - I think he's been great, but that was bonkers from him!

I'm just making the point t that it wasn't the "disallowed daz goal" that was the issue tonight.

[hibbysam]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Ankles or knees, the point is he deliberately booted McGinn with no intention of going for the ball. At the pace he went in he could easily have injured him. That’s not just a cynical foul.

Agreed.

It’s violent conduct not professional fouls. Trips and pulls are professional fouls, lashing out with your feet in a kicking motion with the ball well away is violent conduct.

[kaimendhibs]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Professional foul is a yellow is it not? It was a bit of a cynical challenge but I do t think it was a red. Marciano decision was correct too IMO.

There seems to be a thread about the ref every time we don’t win.

A professional foul is a tug or a trip. Not a blatant boot in the knee

Sent from my VTR-L09 using Tapatalk

[green day]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

If it had been the defender doing that to Hanlon there is no danger we're getting a penalty for it.

Agreed. But my point was, same thing other end, we would want - and probably get - a free kick. In the same vein as keepers get too much protection.