hibs.net Messageboard

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 51

Thread: Lennon ban

  1. #1
    the mild mannered janitor Last Minute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Maybury
    Age
    59
    Posts
    1,276

    Lennon ban

    3 match and 2 suspended


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #2
    Imagine the ban he would have received if he was protesting a decision that was actually right.

    Referee should have the ban, not Lennon.

  4. #3
    First Team Breakthrough
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Grapes!
    Posts
    448
    Quote Originally Posted by Last Minute View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    3 match and 2 suspended
    Is the first one this Friday?

  5. #4
    @hibs.net private member cabbageandribs1875's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    in a house in Bathgate
    Posts
    54,152
    any mention of a ban for the incompetent kevin ******* Clancy

  6. #5
    @hibs.net private member renato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Peebles
    Age
    44
    Posts
    2,995
    Out of interest, what did Potter get for his sarcastic clap when he got sent to the stand?
    .

  7. #6
    What games has Clancy reffed since? If he's been chucked into the lower leagues and being paid less as a result it suggest the powers that be know NL had a point.
    PM Awards General Poster of The Year 2015, 2016, 2017. Probably robbed in other years

  8. #7
    Left by mutual consent!
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    860
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy.1875 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Is the first one this Friday?
    Yes.

  9. #8
    @hibs.net private member SouthMoroccoStu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Easter Road
    Age
    39
    Posts
    4,980
    So ( and excuse my stupidity ) is that 3 game ban total, 2 of which are suspended - so 1 game if he behaves himself. Or 5 game ban with 2 suspended?

  10. #9
    Left by mutual consent!
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    860
    Quote Originally Posted by Pretty Boy View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    What games has Clancy reffed since? If he's been chucked into the lower leagues and being paid less as a result it suggest the powers that be know NL had a point.
    Regardless of that he already had a 2 game suspended ban activated otherwise it would have just have been a one game ban for being sent to the stand. You can’t really complain about the conclusion that’s why I don’t think Lennon attended.

  11. #10
    Left by mutual consent!
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    860
    Quote Originally Posted by SouthMoroccoStu View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    So ( and excuse my stupidity ) is that 3 game ban total, 2 of which are suspended - so 1 game if he behaves himself. Or 5 game ban with 2 suspended?
    3 game ban 2 games suspended.

    2 games activates from the last suspended ban.

    3 games in total, 2 more suspended.

  12. #11
    @hibs.net private member SouthMoroccoStu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Easter Road
    Age
    39
    Posts
    4,980
    Cheers Sauzee!

    To also answer my own question

    Neil Lennon has received a three match immediate ban by the Scottish FA following the recent away match against Kilmarnock, with a further two-match suspended ban in place. - from the Hibs website

  13. #12
    @hibs.net private member givescotlandfreedom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    38
    Posts
    7,882
    Quote Originally Posted by renato View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Out of interest, what did Potter get for his sarcastic clap when he got sent to the stand?
    Not sure about that or him lashing out at Martin Boyle

  14. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Pretty Boy View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    What games has Clancy reffed since? If he's been chucked into the lower leagues and being paid less as a result it suggest the powers that be know NL had a point.

    just checked, he has the hamilton game this weekend.

  15. #14
    @hibs.net private member SouthMoroccoStu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Easter Road
    Age
    39
    Posts
    4,980
    Quote Originally Posted by we are hibs View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    just checked, he has the hamilton game this weekend.
    So top flight football at the same rate of pay

    Lennon should have smacked him. At least that would deserve a ban. He's being mostly punished for his post match comments. All of which are correct and supported by video evidence and fellow professionals and pundits

    Especially when he's ( Kevin Clancy ) made 3 big decisions against us this season - all wrong

    No human error or incompetence- Clancy is a cheat

  16. #15
    Testimonial Due Stokesy's on fire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    1,825
    the SFA are a total shambles. shocking decision.

  17. #16
    @hibs.net private member JimBHibees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Amityville
    Posts
    46,461
    Quote Originally Posted by givescotlandfreedom View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Not sure about that or him lashing out at Martin Boyle
    What I was thinking? Levein given his attitude and not being shy about calling out refs seems for some reason to be untouchable. His pushing of Boyle and Barker should have seen a ban of some sort but no nothing to see here. Lennon has been badly dealt with IMO.

  18. #17
    @hibs.net private member JimBHibees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Amityville
    Posts
    46,461
    Quote Originally Posted by SouthMoroccoStu View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    So top flight football at the same rate of pay

    Lennon should have smacked him. At least that would deserve a ban. He's being mostly punished for his post match comments. All of which are correct and supported by video evidence and fellow professionals and pundits

    Especially when he's ( Kevin Clancy ) made 3 big decisions against us this season - all wrong

    No human error or incompetence- Clancy is a cheat
    What are the 3 can only think of penalties v rangers and killie?

  19. #18
    Ultimate Slaver Keith_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    In der Hölle
    Posts
    35,067
    Quote Originally Posted by renato View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Out of interest, what did Potter get for his sarcastic clap when he got sent to the stand?

    Don't you mean when he was sent to stand two steps higher up, directly behind the Dugout, because he refused to go to the 'Director's Box'?


    Oh and sarcastic applause of the referee is only deemed an offense to Hibs Managers...




  20. #19
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Age
    55
    Posts
    2,205
    Tin hat firmly on here. NL was correct by his comments but there are certain ways to go about it. For instance when asked about what he thought about a certain decision it’s easy enough to say I’ll be writing to the SFA and we’ll see if they invite me in to discuss the decision mentioned.

    Straight away it’s out there he’s not happy about a decision, then pressures on SFA straight away to act as next interview he can say the same thing about writing in but probably not worth it as he’s heard nothing back etc from first decision.

    I’m firmly in the camp of treating referees with respect and it should only be captains and managers that talk to them. If it was brought in to move the ball forward like Rugby does if arguing with Ref then I would welcome that with open arms.

    Do not think for one moment the refs in Scotland are any good most are useless, but what I find interesting is how many folk from all football teams ( myself included so I am a hypocrite too ) don’t get of their backside do the refs course and become one too and change the standard of refs from within.

    Might be wrong here but believe if your a good enough ( and let’s be honest can’t be hard with our standard ) you would soon be on £800-£850 a game. Then maybe just maybe managers wouldn’t argue with the correct decisions.

    GGTTH

  21. #20
    Left by mutual consent!
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    860
    The charge against his comments got completely dropped.

    It was for acting in an aggressive manner on or next to the field of play.

  22. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by southern hibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Tin hat firmly on here. NL was correct by his comments but there are certain ways to go about it. For instance when asked about what he thought about a certain decision it’s easy enough to say I’ll be writing to the SFA and we’ll see if they invite me in to discuss the decision mentioned.

    Straight away it’s out there he’s not happy about a decision, then pressures on SFA straight away to act as next interview he can say the same thing about writing in but probably not worth it as he’s heard nothing back etc from first decision.

    I’m firmly in the camp of treating referees with respect and it should only be captains and managers that talk to them. If it was brought in to move the ball forward like Rugby does if arguing with Ref then I would welcome that with open arms.

    Do not think for one moment the refs in Scotland are any good most are useless, but what I find interesting is how many folk from all football teams ( myself included so I am a hypocrite too ) don’t get of their backside do the refs course and become one too and change the standard of refs from within.

    Might be wrong here but believe if your a good enough ( and let’s be honest can’t be hard with our standard ) you would soon be on £800-£850 a game. Then maybe just maybe managers wouldn’t argue with the correct decisions.

    GGTTH
    Agree. He can't go screaming in the referees face and he knows that. He lost it whether he was wrong or right. Hopefully the three games go ok without him in the dugout.

  23. #22
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Age
    55
    Posts
    2,205
    Quote Originally Posted by Sauzee16 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The charge against his comments got completely dropped.

    It was for acting in an aggressive manner on or next to the field of play.
    Doesn’t delete my comments any if the standard of refs were better the likelihood of this happening would be slimmer. What I’m trying to say is even though the Ref was wrong with his decision that doesn’t make it exceptable for NL comments or actions, only he is responsible for those.

    If and let’s be honest here he was manager of another team would we as a Hibs support be so understanding of his comments or actions? Right, wrong or indifferent we have now lost him for 3 games to the stand.

    GGTTH

  24. #23
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    7,144
    Quote Originally Posted by Stokesy's on fire View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    the SFA are a total shambles. shocking decision.
    No need to worry, Neil Doncaster is on the board now so that'll be everything sorted out...

  25. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by Sauzee16 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    3 game ban 2 games suspended.

    2 games activates from the last suspended ban.

    3 games in total, 2 more suspended.
    He never got any games because of his last ban. That suspension ended in December. He got 5 games for this incident alone, 2 suspended.

  26. #25
    Left by mutual consent! majorhibs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Meadowbank, Edinburgh, Rio.
    Age
    58
    Posts
    1,927
    Quote Originally Posted by KingDomofFife84 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Agree. He can't go screaming in the referees face and he knows that. He lost it whether he was wrong or right. Hopefully the three games go ok without him in the dugout.
    How high pitched was your version of “scream”? How many decibels was your version of “scream”? Behave you & the rest wi “scream” ffs!

  27. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by May2116 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    He never got any games because of his last ban. That suspension ended in December. He got 5 games for this incident alone, 2 suspended.
    Correct. His outburst at Killie was just a few weeks after the last ban conditions expired. He was obviously biting his tongue for a year but eventually let loose once that threat was lifted.

    He was censured for his comments about Clancy, attracting no ban, indicating that the disciplinary committee agreed with him so smacked his wrist i stead. Clancy will have got that message loud and clear. No UEFA goodies for him next season methinks.
    Last edited by hibbyfraelibby; 15-03-2018 at 06:56 PM.

  28. #27
    @hibs.net private member Jones28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Tinto Hill
    Age
    31
    Posts
    18,383
    Anyone saying he shouldn't be banned is kidding themselves FFS

  29. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by Stokesy's on fire View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    the SFA are a total shambles. shocking decision.
    Get real. What did you expect the SFA to do? Congratulate him for getting right in the face of a ref? Poor from Lennon and he has admitted it. Doesn't matter how bad the ref's decison was, what he did deserved punishment. At the time, I'd only just been saying to various folk, having seen him on a flight to Dublin to be a pundit for RTE's Champions League coverage, how much he had matured and mellowed and in doing so gained much respect. Then within days he reverts to being Mr Angry. Fair enough, be angry at crappy refereeing but he will have known a ban was coming as soon as he was in Clancy's face. Surprised Hibs did not say anything publicly at the time but I wonder if they did privately. Any employer who has an employee behave in the course of his employment in such a disrespectful manner in such a public way, and in so doing bring the club into disrepute, would normally act. Hope it is a one-off 'cos Lennon in the stand for three games minimum is not good for the team.

  30. #29
    @hibs.net private member green day's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Southside
    Age
    56
    Posts
    10,396
    He's getting a pounding on sportsound right now. Kris Commons the only one sticking up for him.

  31. #30
    Testimonial Due
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Livingston
    Posts
    2,199
    Quote Originally Posted by Keekaboo View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Don't you mean when he was sent to stand two steps higher up, directly behind the Dugout, because he refused to go to the 'Director's Box'?


    Oh and sarcastic applause of the referee is only deemed an offense to Hibs Managers...



    Hate to say it, but Leiven is doing it behind the refs back (coward), Neil was in the refs face when he did it!
    To me its down to basic manners, if you had a go in the same way as Neil did in a pub you would be decked, right or wrong decision!!!
    I still think he got off lightly, if the powers wanted to they could have made a scapegoat out of him!!!!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)