I disagree with your post only in terms of the length of time it is never a penalty. I'd say nearer 10 million years.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Clancy's face seconds after he gave it betrayed him. He's not a cheat, imo, but is a referee who gives decisions on impulse and then regrets them.
Results 31 to 40 of 40
-
24-02-2018 07:00 PM #31
-
24-02-2018 10:44 PM #32
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 397
A handball should not be awarded if a player is ruled to have handled the ball accidentally. This refers to a player either attempting to protect himself from injury, for example by placing the hands in front of the face and then being hit by the ball, or a player being hit on the arm by the ball without moving towards the ball and without being able to move out of the way. An example might be a snap shot hitting the arm of a defender at point-blank range. However, if a player’s arm is in an unnatural position, for example outstretched or above their head, then a foul should be awarded whether accidental or not.....FIFA definition of a not awardable penalty.
Ryans arm was by his side, not in an unnatural position, nor was he moving towards the ball and could not get out of the way.So going by the laws of the game, that should never have been awarded.
-
24-02-2018 11:00 PM #33
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Posts
- 1,959
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
mon the cabbage!!!
-
24-02-2018 11:08 PM #34This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I've had almost fifty years of being a Hibs fan, so I'm not going to be affected by what anyone on the internet says about meMature, sensible signature required for responsible position. Good prospects for the right candidate. Apply within.
-
24-02-2018 11:12 PM #35
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Posts
- 1,959
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
mon the cabbage!!!
-
24-02-2018 11:16 PM #36
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Posts
- 4,943
Ball to man, Clancy is an arshole.
-
25-02-2018 08:23 AM #37
Some of the more tech savvy posters will no doubt be able to link clips of yesterday's decision and the rangers one at ER and the pose the question. "Which one did the same referee deem as intentional and award a penalty and which one did he ignore and give nothing?" Clancy is a ****ing cheat as well as a dreadful ref. A bad combination when put together
-
25-02-2018 09:09 AM #38
The frustrating thing for me is how the officials are prepared to guess about the ball crossing the line when it's against us but not when it's in our favour at Tiny.
The penalty was a shocker. It's just guesswork from Clancy again, imho. If he's seen that properly then there's no way he'd give the penalty. Or at least you'd think there's no way he'd give the penalty given that he saw the The Rangers handball against us and decided that wasn't a penalty.
Clancy is a horrendous referee, hee never looks confident in his decisions and seems to know he's made the wrong call but just goes with it anyway.Follow the Hibs podcast, Longbangers, on Twitter (@longbangers)
https://longbangers.hubwave.net
-
25-02-2018 09:10 AM #39This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
There's no point in playing when the dice is loaded, IMO.
-
25-02-2018 09:15 AM #40This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
would have been if the lino had X-ray vision.
Shocking amount of guesswork by Clancy and his cohorts.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks